Sean Hannity CANCELS Geraldo Rivera

>>Geraldo has disagreed with other personalities
on Fox News when it comes to war with Iran. In fact, there was a video that went viral,
where he is saying it’s a terrible idea to escalate tensions with Iran and Brian Kilmeade
went at it with him. Now, recently he was supposed to make an appearance
on Hannity show, but that appearance was cancelled. And it seems like it was cancelled specifically
because Geraldo was gonna continue making the case that war with Iran is a bad idea. So he starts off with this tweet. Urging Donald Trump to keep his powder dry,
please don’t let this spin out of control. You can always hit them back. Please don’t let this become an escalating,
you hit me, I hit you back harder until we have another full blown, bloody Mid East war
on our hands. What would we win? And so then he ends up responding to someone
who apparently liked his tweet and he says, thanks. I’ll be on with Sean Hannity tonight counseling
restraint and talking about these deeply disturbing developments. And then later he said, Nevermind, Hannity
just canceled me. And I just like to end this whole exchange
with Malcolm Fleschner tweet, cancel culture strikes again.>>I really liked that tweet. So look, before we open this up for discussion,
I just wanna remind you of how passionately Geraldo feels about avoiding war with Iran. This was a segment that Fox had earlier. Take a look.>>Now we have taken this huge military escalation. Now I fear the worst. You’re gonna see the US markets go crazy today. You’re gonna see the price of oil spiking
today. This is a very, very big deal.>>And I don’t know if you heard
>>But this isn’t about his resume of blood and death, it is about what was next. We stopped the next attack, that’s what I
think you’re missing.>>According to the Secretary of State.>>By what credible source,
>>Okay.>>Can you predict what the next Iranian move
would be?>>They’ve been excellent, the US Intelligence
has been excellent since 2003, when we invaded Iraq, disrupted the entire region for no real
reason. Don’t for a minute start cheering this on. What you have done, what we have done, we
have unleashed.>>I will cheer
>>Then you, like Lindsay Graham, have never met a war you didn’t like.>>That is not true, and don’t even say that.>>If President Trump wanted de-escalation-
>>We should just let him kill us for another 15 years.>>If President Trump wanted de-escalation
and to bring our troops home. What this was a reaction to-
>>What about the 700 Americans who are dead? Should they not be happy because of him?>>What about the tens of thousands of Iraqis
who have died since 2003? You have to start seeing things. What the hell are we doing in Baghdad in the
first place? Why are we there? Why aren’t these forces home?>>You’re blaming President Bush for the maniacal
killing of Saddam Hussein?>>I am blaming President Bush in 2003 for
those fake weapons of mass destruction that never existed and the con job that drove us
into that war.>>Listen, you gotta give people credit when
they’re right, and Geraldo was right there. I think that he took a strong position. I also give Geraldo credit for consistently
speaking out against Donald Trump’s disgusting immigration policies on Fox. I’m sure that’s not an easy environment to
share your accurate opinions in. But yeah, so Hannity canceled. Now, who knows? Maybe they canceled him to maybe replace that
segment with something that involves a legal analyst or?>>I don’t know, should we give Hannity the
benefit of the doubt?>>Hannity did not want any of that smoke. He’s like man, I saw what you did to kill
me. And I don’t think any more clearly than he
does. His producers probably said hey, we’re gonna
go ahead and cancel Geraldo because first off, Geraldo’s only mistake was revealing
what he wanted to do that night. When he talked to the person who retweeted
him or liked it and he goes, thanks I’m gonna be on later to make sure I council against
this. They’re like no that’s not the agenda tonight. That’s not what we’re on board for. Of course, yes again we’re speculating. But I mean, if it’s not the case, go and let
us know what the other difference was. I mean, they canceled on me tonight so I can’t
come on and say what I had to say. So I mean, again, what’ll happen is you end
up revealing what your real intentions are and what your real beliefs are. And people on the region are like, well, 700
Americans were lost. You don’t care about the Americans being lost
when it comes to anything else except for pursuing war. And then so, of course, when Geraldo brings
up the tens of thousands of Iraqis dying, there’s no answer to that. Those aren’t real people? Those are casualties of war. Or when we talk about how we wanna make sure
we keep American troops out of harm’s way. They go hey, well American troops they signed
up for it. They knew what they were getting themselves
into. Somehow when it comes to having any kinda
empathy towards people it’s all based on whether or not you’re falling not behind this president
and his line of ridiculousness. Secondly, Geraldo use Trump’s talking point
about we gotta get out of these stupid wars. You can’t follow a guy who continues to contradict
his own agenda and policies throughout his presidency.>>Right, exactly. And look, it’s hilarious to me to hear anyone
on Fox News or even anyone in cable news talk about how egregious it is or how much of an
injustice it is when Americans die. When in our own country they constantly push
for domestic policy that leads to more Americans dying.>>Totally, my god.>>I mean, how many American die every year
because they don’t have adequate health insurance? And they will attack Universal Healthcare,
over and over again. They’ll talk about how we can’t afford it,
can’t pay for it. When it comes to beating that war-drum, by
the way, which is the most expensive policy to support, they’re all for it. They don’t care about American lives. American’s overall, just like troops are nothing
more than pawns, nothing more than props, that these lowly individuals use to make their
arguments when it’s convenient for them. But when push comes to shove, you think they
really care about the lives of Americans? How about all those segments that Fox News
has done on homeless people? Do they care about them? They defame them, they slander them as dead
beats, as druggists, as all sorts of things. They don’t care about human lives. What cares about is appeasing Trump, making
sure that Trump is happy with him. Because you never know, you might lose access
to Trump if you criticize him. And you might not be able to get a job in
Trump’s administration. We all know that Trump likes to pick people
out of Fox News. So it’s just gross. And look, not to get too leftist, I guess,
whatever you wanna call it. But that’s what capitalism is, that’s what
capitalism does. It’s all about profit, it’s all about ensuring
that you have the upper hand and you increase your chances of making more money, right? That’s what happens in our media all the time,
right?>>Making money and being a tough guy, that’s
the other part of it. Even people who don’t have, I guess, the interests
for lining their pockets. It’s, hey, we’re tough guys, we’re America. Hey, we don’t let them F with us like this. Hey, you’re not gonna say that to me. There’s a superiority complex that we have
from the moment that we’re born that says, we have to make sure that we talk about how
much better we are than you no matter what. You can be on the lowest totem pole in America. But you’re like, I’m an American, I’m better
than you. But your life actually has nothing to do with
this American dream that they’ve sold you. That you’re supposed to somehow pursue. And one more thing that they don’t care about
lives for is school shootings, mass shootings, Car Club shootings. We don’t care about that stuff, thoughts and
prayers. What bombs we dropping on people to stop that
from happening? American lives are being lost every day. You don’t care about American lives.>>Again, it’s just something that they cite
when it’s convenient to them to support a policy that’s horrendous, usually. And, in this case, it’s escalated tensions
and war with Iran. So, again, credit where credit is due. I think Geraldo is doing a good job. And I think that he should be proud of the
fact that Hannity canceled his appearance, right? Look, I don’t know what his future is gonna
look like. Obviously, Shep Smith, who had the audacity
to speak the truth every once in a while on Fox News is no longer there. But we know what Fox News is, Geraldo knows
what Fox News is. I don’t agree with Geraldo on many issues. But if you have any integrity and you actually
want to share truthful analysis with an audience, Fox News is not the place to do it. You’re hardly even seen on cable news shows
period, much less on Fox News.

AOC Takes A Shot At Biden

>>Freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
fired a shot at Joe Biden. This was when she was asked about a Biden
presidency to which she responded, God.>>In any other country, Joe Biden and I would
not be in the same party, but in America, we are. Now this was in an interview with New York
Magazine. I wanna give you some more context so first,
let’s take a quick look at the article itself. One Year in Washington, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
reshaped her party’s agenda, resuscitated Bernie Sanders’s campaign and hardly has a
friend in town. But let me just be clear about something. She might not have many friends in the Washington
establishment, but she has a lot of constituents and voters who are rooting for her and we’re
certainly among them. Now here’s how that line came up in the article. She said the Congressional Progressive Caucus
should start kicking people out if they stray too far from the party line. Other caucuses within the Democratic Party
in Congress require applications, Ocasio-Cortez pointed out. But they let anybody who the cat dragged in
call themselves a progressive. There’s no standard, she said. And I totally agree with her on that. I mean, we had Democratic presidential candidates
claiming that they were progressives while they were supporting fascist regimes in India. I mean, that’s not progressivism, like it’s
just->>Well, it’s easy to label yourself something,
yes.>>Yeah, exactly.>>And it’s easy to also imply that you support
the same, like if I were to ask you who among the Democratic primary contenders supports
the Green New Deal? Well, technically all of them, I guess, do
you think it means the same thing for all of them?>>Of course not.>>100% not, which is why we need to dig deeper.>>So she says the same goes for the party
as a whole. She was quoted as saying Democrats can be
too big of a tent. And we certainly know that. I know that this year in particular, when
I say this year I mean over the last six months, has been difficult in labeling myself a Democrat. Because there are members in Democratic leadership
who have enabled Donald Trump to an extent that I’m beyond uncomfortable with. And so identifying as part of the same party
has been incredibly difficult, but the way that the primaries are set up if you’re not
a registered Democrat in certain states, you cannot vote in the Democratic primary. And it’s gross that we have a system that
set up that way.>>Yeah, I hate that the party allows in people
who are so like at least ideologically violent to what it needs to accomplish for its constituents. But I feel like I identify with the Democratic
Party for the same reason AOC says that she has. We’re the actual Democrats, we embody the
spirit of the Democratic party going back way longer than the relatively recent neo-liberal
pro-corporatist thing that’s been, you know it’s been around for three or four decades,
but a big part of the Democratic Party and Democratic leadership. But farther back there, like, the part of
party that was able to get so many reforms for working Americans, that’s what the Democratic
Party needs to be. And just because some of these people are
running for office for the first time, and the party’s currently filled with these ghouls,
doesn’t mean that we don’t have the right to take it back.>>Yeah, you’re right. And we need to fight aggressively for that. Now people were not happy with what Representative
Ocasio-Cortez had to say about Joe Biden, and her views on the Democratic Party having
too much, casting a giant tent when it comes to ideology. And so since people gave her crap about it,
she defended her analysis. And she said, quote, yeah, I don’t know why
people are up in arms about this. Many other countries have multiparty democracies,
where several parties come together in a coalition to govern. In another country, I’d be in a Labor Party. Our primary field would cover two to three
parties and she’s absolutely right about that. Look, people have this visceral reaction to
Ocasio-Cortez because she has this incredible ability to call out the Democratic Party for
its devastating flaws and be effective in doing it. And so I think that that’s a great defense
of the point that she was trying to make. But she should also know that there are people
who are intentionally being obtuse. Like there are people who are intentionally
pretending like they’re dumb and they don’t understand what she’s saying, she didn’t say
anything controversial there.>>Yeah, it’s just true, learn about other
countries, I don’t know what to tell you. But that she has that ability to call out
the Democratic Party and specifically Democratic leadership, while also showing how it should
be done. She’s not just a critic. She is driving the conversation. She is organizing people and getting people
involved in this. That’s why you’re gonna see so many candidates
that were, some inspired by Bernie Sanders, others inspired by AOC. She’s in there as a critic, but she’s also
showing the way it should be.>>Absolutely.

Trumpist Nationalism is Silly & Won’t Solve Problems

We are going back to the phones at (617) 830-4750 let’s check in with Jeremy in Wisconsin. Jeremy
in Wisconsin on the six Oh eight number. Jeremy, what’s going on? Hey David, how are you doing? Good, how are you? Well, good, good. So my question, um, sort
of relates to, I guess the ever increasing role of international bodies and governance.
So seeing, I guess the example I’m thinking about is the Amazon rainforest. How that obviously
if it’s being destruct or it’s being destroyed, it has international consequences that affect
every nation. So I was wondering if you think with things like that going on and kind of
globalization increasing general, do you think international bodies will be more strong in
the future? And do you think they should go in that route? Well, I’ve said before that the um, the, the
idea that most of our major issues can be solved within country borders is increasingly
an idea of the past. I mean, listen, the U S can solve campaign finance internally. Sure.
But the U S is not going to be able to deal with automation and outsourcing independently.
We’re not going to be able to deal with climate change independently. We’re not gonna be able
to deal with pollution independently. Space travel is something that is going to exceed
country lines. It’s space exploration. So the hyper nationalist mentality that other
peoples problems are only theirs and not ours. And all of our problems are merely hours to
to solve. And we don’t need anybody else. It is such an antiquated and, and, and, and
uh, at this point, frankly bogus assertion that, um, we are going to need to solve these
issues together. That’s why that’s another reason, aside from sometimes the xenophobic
overtones of the hyper nationalists, it also just doesn’t work. That’s fair. Yeah. So I was wondering, I guess
you see the, I guess the results of the European model, how there’s been a little bit of pushback
to that with the rise of I guess nationalist rhetoric and parts of the world. Do you think
America is going to go down the European model and you’re going to see more, I guess global
connections in terms of um, making policy? Um, if we, if we elect the right people? Sure.
I mean, the current president is someone who has resisted that and is more of a go it go
it alone sort of guy. And the effect that it’s having is that increasingly the United
States doesn’t have a seat at the adult table on more and more issues when it comes to a
global trade. Trump is just putting tariffs on people and increasingly the, the, the sort
of outcast when it comes to climate change, he’s not even invited to a lot of important
summits and discussions. So I hope that that happens, but it’s going to depend on who we
elect. Awesome. All right. Thank you David. Appreciate
you answering my question. Alright, Jeremy, great to hear from you

Henry’s Law and Its Application – Solution and Colligative Properties – Chemistry Class 12

Do subscribe to Ekeeda Channel and press bell icon to get updates about latest engineering HSC and IIT JEE main and advanced videos in the last lecture we have studied that the effect of pressure is plays a very important role in solubility of gas this effect of pressure is nothing but Henry’s law let us study it in deep so what Henry’s law says Henry knows is that if the pressure is more which is applied on the solution then the solubility also increases let us say I’ll say policing continuation of Henry’s law and its application so let us see what is henry’s law Henry’s law says that the solubility of the gas in liquid at a constant temperature is slightly proportional to the pressure of the gas above the solution it means if you apply both pressure then the solute E of gas will be more and if you apply less pressure then the solubility of the gases in the liquid will be less so it is given in the formula s is slightly proportion to P so therefore solubility is equals to K into P and what is scale case Henry’s constant and s is nothing but solubility of the gas in liquid while P is the pressure that is applied on the gas to get dissolved in the liquid let us see what is Henry’s constant and this constant which is denoted by the letter K is known as it is nothing but the solubility of gas in moles per diem cube at 1 atmospheric pressure at constant temperature so suppose if s is goes to K into P so then will be the Henry’s constant is goes to one atmosphere when the solubility will be 1 or when the pressure will be 1 so now let’s see what are the applications of Henry’s law so these are the applications the first one is production of carbonated beverages as you know many of the calculated beverages like you might be consuming cokes and all they have carbon dioxide or carbonated water in it and what are those they have carbon dioxide gases that are dissolved in the liquid and hence they have a effervescence and hence they have effervescence whenever you have opened the bottle so by dissolving the gases you can make beverages and hence these are the applications of Henry’s law the second one the second one is nothing but the people living at high altitude people living at high altitude there is very small quantity of oxygen present in their environment why because at high altitude the pressure is also very less and hence as we know according to the Henry’s law if the pressure is more the gas that could dissolve in the liquid alone should be more and at high altitude since the pressure is very much less the oxygen in the environment is also very less and hence people face various problems and that problem is known as a knob here which means filling Nassif Nassif lesion of blood in the body will also be less as he bogi which is present in the body it absorbs oxygen but at higher to do the option quantity is less so therefore the people living there faces this kind of problems so thank you friends for watching this video I hope you have liked this video and please don’t forget to subscribe on e Kirra channel and do let your friends also share this video thank you so much

Federal Government Raises Tobacco & Vaping Age to 21 – SouthSmoke

*music* Announcer: Welcome to,
the web’s #1 premier hookah store. Enjoy this video and make sure to visit us
on web at *Upbeat music* What’s up everyone? here to discuss the new federal
smoking age and how it affects you. Just recently the federal government raised
the age restriction on the purchase of tobacco and vape products from 18 to 21. With this new nationwide restriction, SouthSmoke
wanted to bring it to the forefront and help answer any questions you may have. First up, what states require you to be 21
to buy tobacco products? Before the government and FDA decided to change
the minimum age to 21, 19 states had already done so. The remaining states will have to abide by
this new federal law. To easily answer this question, every state
is now 21 for the minimum age to buy all types of tobacco products including cigarettes,
cigars, e-cigarettes, vape juice and hookah tobacco. So, what are some pros of raising the smoking
and vaping age to 21? The new age requirement to buy tobacco products
is a huge public health accomplishment for the White House and the FDA. The main reason for the change is to decrease
the number of teenagers and young adults who start smoking. This in turn should reduce smoking caused
diseases and deaths. Many think that any tax revenue lost will
be made up through lower health care costs in the future. But why the change to 21? The new legal age to buy tobacco is a direct
result of the teen vaping epidemic. The FDA thinks that tobacco companies are
targeting kids and young adults with flavored tobacco to secure future addicts. A theory is that the new law will keep tobacco
out of high schools. By raising the minimum age, senior students
and those just graduated will not be able to buy for younger, underage classmates anymore. So will the law affect your local hookah lounge? It’s early on so it’s hard to tell. A large part of hookah lounge traffic comes
from college aged individuals between 18 and 21. We’ll just have to wait and see how hookah
lounges are affected. In the end, had to change its
policy to conform with this new federal age restriction as well. All shoppers at SouthSmoke must be at least
21 years of age to purchase all hookah tobacco, charcoal, hookahs and hookah accessories. Hopefully this answered some of your questions
about the new federal age law on smoking tobacco and we hope to see you again soon at *music* Announcer: Please like, comment, subscribe,
and remember to visit us online at, where we offer the largest selection of hookah
supplies at the lowest prices available worldwide.

How do we obey the moral law without being moralistic? – Sinclair Ferguson

We obey the moral law first of all by understanding
what it’s for, and there are various ways of putting this. I happen lifelong to be interested in the
game of golf. Golf is played according to rules. I have never met a golfer who has said to
me “if I move my golf ball nearer the hole,” never said “that’s fine” because the game
ceases to work when you don’t play the game according to the rules. And one of the most important things for us
to understand is that, take the Ten Commandments for example, the moral law. The moral law given in Exodus chapter 20,
is a written form and set in a negative cast for sinners of the basic way in which Adam
and Eve functioned as human beings. And of course, it’s written now for sinners,
and so it has a lot of negatives. But what the law is telling us¬—this is
the master plan for your life. You only function as the image of God as you
give expression to these principles in your life. As we do that, trusting in the Lord, there
really is, there’s no real danger that we will become legalistic. I think it’s true that people, many people
say just obedience to the law is legalistic because actually what they are irritated by
is the notion that anybody would tell them what to do. But if you are Christian, Jesus tells you
what to do. He says if you love me, keep my commandments. So, faith in Christ produces love for Christ. Love for Christ produces a desire to be like
Christ. Christ fulfilled the law, and so being like
Christ fulfills the law. There are two other elements. One is that’s the way we please our heavenly
Father, and the other is that both the Old Testament prophecy of the new covenant and
the letter to the Hebrews twice citing the words says that when you are born again what
is written into your heart is the law. So, in a way it’s kind of surprising that
so many Christians who believe in the Holy Spirit are apparently not well enough instructed
to know what it is that the Holy Spirit comes to do—that is to work into our hearts an
affection for an obedience to the law of God because of our love for and trust in the Lord
Jesus Christ. So long as we keep our loving heavenly Father
in view, as long as we keep our savior in view, as long as we keep the Holy Spirit in
view, we will be saved from any danger of falling into legalism no matter how much we
may be accused of doing that because we think it’s important to be obedient to the law. Usually that kind of accusation comes from
people who are irritated about the notion that anybody would tell you what to do, and
there’s a bundle of commands in the New Testament. I think the answer is fairly straightforward. The challenge is growing in grace so that
that becomes a reality in our lives.

Kohlrausch’s Law – Electrochemistry – Chemistry Class 12

Do subscribe to Ekeeda Channel and press bell icon to get updates about latest engineering HSC and IIT JEE main and advanced videos Hello Friends in the last lecture we have studied that the for a strong electrolyte we could easily calculate the lambda naught that is the maximum limiting value for the strong electrolyte formula conductivity but for me correctly it was very much hectic and it was cannot be finer but for this thing we have helped but for this thing we have bought an equation which is based on corner table from where we could find the lambda naught that is the maximum limiting value for the molar conductivity so let us see what is for rational so before understanding what is scholar so let us understand what is the definition of the cockroach law and what does it states it states that and infrared diffusion each is my greatest independently of its coil and make its contribution to the total molar conductivity of the electric irrespective of the nature of its ID it says that an infinite dilution the cation and an N the both contribute some amount of the molar conductivity for the whole electronic and in this case the cation and irrespective of the nature of its cohen and has my calculating this to Munna conductivities of a cation and bullock and rittany of an NN we could estimate that what would be the molar conductivity of a particular solution at infinite tension for that case we have derive the formula in this way where lambda naught is the molar conductivity of a particular solution or of a particular enabling infinite dilution so for that it is the combination of molar conductivity of the ion that is molar conductivity of the cation and infinite dilution and molar conductivity of and then at infinite dilutions so this makes where lambda naught of plus is nothing but molar conductivity of Quetta at infinite dilution while lambda knot of – that it it is mula conductivity of ni at infinite dilution so by the help of this we could estimate what would be the molar conductivity of a particular electrolyte for example if I consider an example like this one if you know the molar conductivity of KCl and if we know the molar conductivity of NaCl so by this we could estimate what would be the overall molar conductivity of that particular solution so let me give an example of that if I consider the molar conductivity of KCl then I could write in this way that is lambda naught of k plus plus lambda naught of CL minus – of lambda not of any plus plus lambda not of CN – in this case I could write it in this way like lambda not of k plus plus lambda not of CL – which is minus of lambda not of any plus minus lambda naught of CN – in this case we could see that this lambda naught of CL and this lemon out of case Allah has been tense alone and what we have got is lambda naught of k plus minus lambda naught of na plus and it has been found that the molar conductivity of this cation and of that is for potassium and for the sodium the difference was found to be the same as if we have taken a solution and we have described a solution for ki and mea so let us see what will be the value in that situation so if I consider lambda naught of ki minus lambda naught of N and if I have calculated all of her try to determine what would be the molar conductivity of this cations then the answer would be written as in this way and it’s lambda naught of k plus plus lambda naught of I minus I I let indirectly minus lambda naught of any plus minus lambda out of I minus in this case this two will cancel out each other and the rest that will remain with me is lambda naught of k plus minus lambda naught of an A plus so in this case as we could see that the both have the same in that is lambda naught of k plus minus lambda naught of any plus while here in this case also lambda naught of k plus minus lambda naught of endless so means that this two equations that we have derived or that we have estimated the both are not dependent on that particular and so this shows that the molar conductivity of a particular electrolyte depends individually on its cation as it depends individually on its and then also so this plays a very vital role in showing that the cations also contribute their value for the total molar conductivity of a particle electrolyte in a solution for example suppose this Quadra flow is very much validate or it is very much influential to calculate the molar productivity of a weak electrolyte how let me do if I consider strong it rides like the lambda naught of X in the lambda naught of sodium acetate and the lambda of M is here in this case all the three are very strong electrolytes and with the help of this values we could estimate what would be the value of the V electric suppose in this case I need the weak electrolyte like acetic acid to be estimated the value of the molar conductivity to be estimated how can I do that see it is very much simple the lambda naught of ch3cooh can be calculated in a form where if I sum up the lambda naught of sodium acetate and exhale and if I am eliminated or if I subtract this value that is lambda naught of Arison then I could possibly get the value of the lambda naught for acetic acid or the molar conductivity at infinite attention for acetic acid let us see so if I add up ch3coo ne plus lambda naught of HCl minus lambda naught of NECN in this case what I could get is lambda out of ch3co for minus plus lambda naught of na plus plus in for this case lambda naught 4-h plus minus lambda naught say plus lambda naught of C n minus 1 in this case I would get minus lambda naught of na plus y minus lambda naught of CL minus so in this case if I observe I could see that this na plus and this NFS we cancel out each other when this CL and this CL value of the molar conductivity of the entities in case of cl minus they will cancel out each other and the thing that is left with me is lambda naught of ch3co minus plus lambda naught of h plus and then this are no the sum of the molar conductivity of a particular cation and molar conductivity of a fatima NN at infinite dilution and this will give an overall value of the molar conductivity of a weak electrolyte so this is how the corrosion law has helped to estimate the value of the molar conductivity of a vehicle a plate at infinite dimensional soup which was not been estimated in graphically that we have did earlier so this was the most important thing that we have learned now so thank you friends for watching this video I hope you have liked this video and even share this video with your friends and please don’t forget to subscribe you get a channel thank you so much