Unhinged Celebrities Losing It! Want Trump Assaulted, Rename Republican Party To ‘The Rape Party’


Multiple Hollywood personalities have gotten
involved with politics and it’s becoming extremely unhinged. Actress Molly Ringwald has taken it upon herself
to rename the Republican Party to ‘The Rape Party” and she’s facing quite a bit of
criticism from citizens accusing her of calling them “rapists” simply for their political
affiliation. Ringwald, 50, best known for Sixteen Candles
and The Breakfast Club, has become outspoken amid the controversial events engulfing the
confirmation of Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh and the pushback orchestrated by Senate Democrats. Ringwald was quite clear with her message
and disdain for Republican Party and Republicans in general who support Brett Kavanaugh as
he fights accusations from Christine Blasey Ford who says that he sexually assaulted her
in the early 1980’s while they were in high school. Ford has yet to produce a corroborating witness
and the people she named thus far have spoken against her story. Ringwald took her voice to Twitter, lashing
out at Republicans. “It’s no longer the Republican Party to
me. It’s the Rape Party.” Another Hollywood actress lashed out at Republicans
as well. Sarah Silverman attacked President Trump,
hoping that he would one day know what it feels like to be held down and violated. She stated this in response to Trump criticizing
the protesters confronting senators in/at the elevators as they attempt to move to a
different floor. “I hope you someday understand what it is
to be held down against your will and violated. Your compassion is startless” “The very rude elevator screamers are paid
professionals only looking to make Senators look bad. Don’t fall for it! Also, look at all of the professionally made
identical signs. Paid for by Soros and others. These are not signs made in the basement from
love! #Troublemakers” Kathy Griffin also chimed in, ranting off
a string of expletives towards Senators voting in favor of Kavanaugh. She dedicated a special message to Sen. Jeff
Flake (R-AZ) who was fine with Democrats requesting the FBI investigation into Kavanaugh’s accusations,
but then seems to believe that the FBI report to be sufficient enough and he voted YES to
push Kavanaugh to the next stage of the confirmation. Griffin seems very angry over this. Griffin was unable to hold a job with CNN
and Squatty Potty after she was seen in a picture holding a fake decapitated head of
President Donald Trump. More celebrities were involved in the anti-Kavanaugh/Trump
antics. Amy Schumer and Emily Ratajkowski were arrested
during protests held at Capitol Hill. However, a contradicting report on their arrest
came out that suggested otherwise. Their arrest seems more like a “let’s
pretend to get arrested for social media likes” act. Getting a $50 ticket is much different than
getting arrested. However, the two celebrities were able to
get their social media pictures that made it seem like they were being arrested and
resisting with protesters. This seems more like a publicity stunt than
someone who actually cares about politics. Schumer has starred in multiple movies, most
known for the movie Trainwreck. Emily Ratajkowski became stunningly famous
when she starred in the ‘Blurred Lines’ music video, which turned out to be one of
the worst songs ever created (my opinion). Ratajkowski’s popularity grew as she posted
sultry photos on Instagram. Hollywood is becoming unhinged and too involved
in politics.

Are Republicans Even Excited About the Republican Party?


now let’s go to Michael sure political
correspondent for The Young Turks on current tv Michael let’s talk a little bit about
yesterday’s keynote speeches I kind of did my instant analysis I had really the most
say about the ann Romney speech because that was really about Mitt Romney
where’s the chris Christie speech was a lot about in getting respect but I didn’t really
find him to be talking that much about Mitt Romney give me your overview
of how you thought the first made a speech is one well I mean you know here’s here’s the
the basic overview in the hall it does not feel electric I sorta I ask somebody who I’m one working
with I at current who’s been to it on a
conventions I its I it felt to me like this is what the bob dole 96 the bob dole inventor
must’ve felt like he said that was even more raucous I don’t know if it was the hangover the
hurricane I don’t know close the uncertainty I’ll what’s gonna and today April there
they were in the suspenders talk you’re spending the convention if if people needed to go
to a hurricane Isaac I don’t know what it was but there was
some electricity in the hall horse a lot of people could say well
it’s the candidate so all the speeches were played to a very sordid somber all we heard from
people up somebody who we are I guess it’s a a
source inside the planning committee the
convention they were told to turn up the volume up on all the music so it was
boisterously lout up when the music was playing in all just kinda
make it seem more alive so at the the the speeches themselves it’s not their fault fell on deaf ears
but it took a while the biggest ovation want to start water when he was
introduced %uh that was topped by Rick Santorum in
to go over the speeches Rick Santorum’s speech I think felt like the keynote address to
this whole all and chris Christie’s was the keynote so
the rest the country’s I and that that’s how they picked up
chris Christie speaks to me was the kick-off the Christie 2016 I yet some good singers in there I
thought it was so good really professional well delivered speech up it is what a
keynote speech is gonna be I’m not agree with a lot I said I think it’s weird
that was it was a a lot a lot a lot a you know up this in lot misleading in that speeds but it was a professional speech and and
that’s what I thought and probably at your anybody you’re talking about how
this was just a blow a speech do you know anyone David’s who’s like talking to a friend and
saying: I really like when she said acts there’s nothing that you can cite
from anything that was said except prospectus pizza was sort of the Panola sweet loving wife speech and then Romney
came out at the end for really brief interlude with her and
with that but the crowd it see you know in other years
would have gone on much longer ovations come back don’t leave there was not that he was out there for
like 11 seconds then they left yeah it is strange that you know the and
Romney speech it’s funny because who I’m surprised outside the convention Green
Zone so to speak yeah before the speech everybody was
saying it’s gonna be incredible she’s going to be wonderful it’s gonna turn
everything around you gonna humanize Mitt Romney which by the way if you’re waiting till
six weeks before the election to humanize the guy you’re probably in trouble but with it
was almost like written on the wall because afterwards on TV and on blogs at center
they were saying exactly that which is you know missus America it was
incredible so on and so forth but I’m curious was that the attitude
inside the convention it wasn’t airman everybody of course
that that everybody inside the convention and the media also the ones
that are putting that out making making the statement that this is
gonna softened candidate setter however what what really showed through
was that she gave a speech that while it was
really important and they kept adjusting schedules to make sure it got prime-time
coverage it didn’t do courted everyone inside the
Green Zone you describe here which is accurate up
that did everybody here did feel that there
is something magical about it was sweet it was you know above
criticism but it was certainly well below adulation and I think that
was the the problem with her speech last
night it will be for gotten I in the annals of books %uh convention
speeches but I think they’re gonna be clip clips and both chris Christie’s beat not from ann
Romney speech in that much it seems like a nice moment and she but
she didn’t create a bob between her husband in America Los so much like newt Gingrich said about
Mitt Romney you don’t particularly dislike ann
Romney right now right I don’t particularly ally I have
nothing at Sarah I couldn’t care less about the perfect general you know I really but I mean
eitan barbara Bush annoying during Katrina but she was well
beyond big group the first lady that what’s I really
couldn’t care less I i feel like you know obviously we’re gonna be
curious about the we’re gonna interview the people going to talk to them we’re
gonna wonder gonna opinion when our opinions about
the I could not care less so but she does seem like a lovely woman she’s a
since your woman she’s upped been through a lot with
breast cancer and happen bassam race in five or place and she did a
quick you know in that in a in a way not many Americans can do
it but she did it and at so I I couldn’t care less about that
but that was for jobs to speak to america that her husband is
more than what we know already that she didn’t do that job last night Mike alright Michael sure political
correspondent for The Young Turks on current tv: we’re gonna watch the speeches tonight
and we’ll check in with you tomorrow thanks as always alright david Axe

What Happened to the News


So this year, fake news has become quite a
big issue. In truth it’s been an issue for a few years
– for those of you who have been paying attention anyway. But it seemed to really come out of its shell
this year with the election. Possibly even swaying the results. So let’s talk about it. We’re going to focus on television and internet
news here, because basically anything before that is pre-history and doesn’t matter. When the news first started there were only
the big three, ABC, CBS, and NBC – in 1970 PBS was created and publicly funded. It’s basically the closest thing the US
has to a state-run channel. But back to the big three. They were all basically the same and you could
basically trust any of them. They were pretty… basic. They competed on getting the story the most
correct or the most in-depth. There was no such thing as getting it “first”
since every news show was at the same time. Journalism was an honorable profession and
the men who sat behind the desk were some of the most powerful people in the country
– and strangely, only ever used that power for good. There was one problem though. Congress would allow the fledgling networks
free use of taxpayer owned airwaves in exchange for one public service. That public service would be one hour of airtime
set aside for informational broadcasting, or what we now call the evening news. Congress failed to include in its deal the
one requirement that would changed our national discourse immeasurably for the better. The news was a public service. Nothing is more important to a well-functioning
democracy than a well-informed, well-educated electorate. Which is why we also have public schools. Anyway while television stations were willing
to take a financial loss on their mandatory hour of news each day, they soon realized
that they could sell prime advertising space during that hour. An hour when everyone, young or old, regardless
of what television shows they liked to watch, would be watching. And soon, television news became about the
ratings. The news became flashier and more dramatic. There were still only the four competitors
so they weren’t stepping too far out of the range of acceptability though. And while the news was still basically the
information you needed to know, they occasionally threw in some things you might just WANT to
know. You could still trust the big three to do
their due diligence and get a story right – because they had all day to prepare for
it and would only have once or twice to tell it to you. Everyone was consuming basically the same
apple. People may have preferred to get their news
from Dan Rather or Tom Brokaw, but the two anchors saw themselves as equals, not competitors. And when you saw someone else at work, you
knew they were eating basically the same apple – so you might have different opinions on
things, but you were basing those opinions on the same set of facts. Nobody was thinking “Oh you watch CBS? What’s wrong with you, they spin things
so hard you’re practically brainwashed.” No, CBS was the channel for old people because
it was boring. But really It didn’t matter whether you
got your news from an old guy at a desk in front of a red background or an old guy in
front of a blue background. As long as you weren’t watching PBS, because
PBS didn’t have to compete for advertisers so they were boring as sh-
But that all changed with cable. Now at first, cable news was just CNN – the
appropriately-named Cable News Network. But it really began to change when MSNBC and
Fox News came about in the late 90’s. If you ate your apples before like everyone
else, but you really liked it when you’d occasionally find a sweet one. You were in luck. You didn’t expect it all the time but it
was a nice little surprise. Enter Cable News. All sweet apples, all the time, just how you
like them. None of that boring middle stuff and especially
none of those sour ones. Wait, that guy likes sour apples? What is wrong with him, he’s clearly getting
the wrong news and is clearly a moron. And that’s where we are now. You can choose the news you get. How you get it, who presents it, what spin
they put on it. Right wing news for right wing people; sour
apples for sour people. And since they’re in direct 24-hour competition
with each other, they often make it a point to report on the mistakes of the others. Something that would have been unheard of
when it was just the big three. They take it a step further by telling you
just how bad those sour apples really are for you and how all the sour apple people
are lazy. Hardly anyone watches the boring middle apples
anymore – the Nightly News on the big three. The ones who take the time to pick which stories
are important enough for that half hour a day and make sure they’re accurate. By the time the news comes on at night, you’ve
already heard about it on the 24-hour networks – or the internet – all day. The cable news networks aren’t competing
for your attention by being accurate, they’re competing for it by being first… or by serving
a specific demographic. And this problem has only been amplified by
the internet. There are only a few players when it comes
to television news – but on the internet there are literally thousands. And the bias is real. It starts at the bottom, with the most innocuous
form of bias: simply choosing whether or not to cover a story because it’s not what your
demo wants to hear, and goes all the way up to making out-right lies. With all of these sources out there, and with
all them biased in some way, it can be really hard to figure out what the truth really is. It takes night-before-the-due-date-college-paper
level-research sometimes to figure out what’s really going on; and most people simply don’t
have the time. Most people have one or two sources and their
friends. Sources they’ve picked because they like
them and friends they keep because they agree with them – thus fulfilling your confirmation
bias and creating the Echo Chamber. But let’s stop talking about the doom and
gloom of news – and just focus on the doom. There are four types of fake news. The lowest form is Sensationalism. This is when the news will pick the most eye-catching
headline possible, often putting their own spin on it. The headline is the first – and sadly, most
often the only – thing a person will read. Whether it’s the name of the link you sent
them, the big letters under the news anchor’s face, or the top of a newspaper article. The headline contains most of the power. Let’s take a look at an example. “Obama Passes Sweeping Healthcare Reform;
Helping Millions” “Government Takeover of Healthcare System
Enacted by Obama” These two are about the same event. And the way the news decides to write the
headline will completely change the way most people will think about that event – whether
they read the story or not. Oftentimes the story itself will be full of
spin as well. This is also where clickbait comes in. The headlines that read “You won’t believe
what happens next” or “what he said next will shock you.” Or when they use a barely-related image of
a super model in order to attract more eyes. I mean, not my eyes, because I don’t objectify
women like that but… other people’s eyes. Advertisers do this too, with some sort of
quiz that only 3% of people can pass. You want to see if you’re part of that special
3%. And once you’re taking the color quiz *roll
eyes* you probably don’t notice is loaded with ads. And then you can share the fact that you’re
smarter than 90% of Harvard students on your facebook – so more people can see those
ads. Which brings us to the second form of fake
news – Sponsored Content. Also called Native Advertising or Branded
Content. John Oliver does a fantastic segment about
this that you should check out. But basically it’s when an advertiser has
paid someone to write a news story or make a youtube video about a specific topic – make
sure it looks like every other article or video… but also make sure to mention their
product. Hi I’m Craig, welcome to the salon, did you
know that people used to believe that brass instruments caused hair loss? And that’s the first of many hair myths that
the scientists at Head and Shoulders are helping us clear up in today’s episode, so I can condition
you to stop telling hair lies. -Mental Floss Clip-
“Hail Corporate!” Now this example isn’t necessarily the news,
but it is educational and informational content, so you shouldn’t reasonably expect native
advertising – and most people probably don’t even notice it. But I do. When it happens in the news, it’s usually
in the morning news, when they’re talking about the latest fashion or some grand opening
of a local store. Recently reddit had an awakening when the
guys at Point released a youtube video describing how they were able to buy top positions on
the website for relatively cheap. Not only that but were able to manipulate
the conversation about those topics in order to present them in the best light possible. Since reddit also isn’t a news source, it’s
an online community, most people felt that the conversation was relatively safe. There had been rumors of sponsored content
on the website for years, but no real hard evidence until now. So now you not only have to wonder “why
is they telling me this… are they trying to sell me something?” but you also have
to look at your online communities and think “a suspiciously high amount of people seem
to be supporting this product… I wonder why…” And now to quite possibly the worst form of
fake news – Hoaxes. Straight up lies and made up stories. This is the type of fake news that most people
blame for swaying the election. Someone with an agenda could easily make up
a story and before it could be proven false, it would have a million facebook shares and
already be in people’s heads as real. Vice News recently interviewed Paul Horner,
one of the most prolific fake news writers who even has his own Wikipedia page! I do what people would say is Fake News. I write my stories on my sites and then drop
my stories on different facebook groups, most of the pro-Trump groups, that’s who I target
a lot of the times. And then they just pass it around, thinking
that it’s true. This is confirmation bias at its worst. Something you already kind of think might
be true is shown to you by a shared news story on Facebook. And now, it doesn’t matter if it’s true
or not – in your head it is. To look at a non-election example, CNN was
accused of airing 30 minutes of transsexual porn over Thanksgiving weekend. H3h3 did a pretty good synopsis of this whole
event, but the story went viral and appeared on several news websites including Fox News
and the New York Post. Of course, CNN didn’t air porn, millions
of people would have seen it. Instead, these all of these news stories were
based off of one tweet saying “CNN is straight up porn right now”. The account no longer exists probably because
of how much attention and hate they were getting. But by the time it was proven false, people
on reddit and facebook had already been posting about it for days and it had transformed into
30 minutes of transsexual porn. And now that people think it’s funny there
are plenty of photoshopped images of porn movies with the CNN logos around, all claiming
to be a picture of the actual event. This is the danger of hoaxes and fake news. If you were to go up and ask someone “Hey,
remember that time CNN accidentally aired porn for 30 minutes?” They’d probably say yes… even if they
don’t actually remember it which may be even worse – but check out my Memory Errors
video if you want to know more about that. That wass a pretty innocent example though…
so remember that time Hilary Clinton called all of the Bernie supporters and Millennials
a “Bucket of Losers?” Breaking tonight another big story, in addition
to the Trump tape, and this one involves Hilary Clinton. Wikileaks published what it claims are transcripts
from closed door speeches that Hilary Clinton to Wall Street executives. Megyn, Hilary Clinton and her campaign have
repeatedly refused to release the transcripts of her speeches and political analysts say
these leaked excerpts are likely the reason why. Including where she apparently called Bernie
Sanders supporters a bucket of losers. You shouldn’t… because it didn’t happen. The Wikileaks transcript of the Goldman Sachs
speech doesn’t even exist. Wikileaks didn’t put it out, it was faked. It was faked at the same time that Wikileaks
DID release a bunch of DNC emails – but none of them included a Goldman Sachs script. But since it sounded kind of like something
she did actually say about some Trump supporters being in a “Basket of Deplorables” people
ran with it. Only this time, she was attacking her base
rather than her competition. And this is the kind of fake news story that
helped turn the election. Some troll is patting himself on the back
for getting his fake story on Fox News – ignoring whatever kind of damage he is likely causing. But let’s talk about the non-damaging type
of fake news – Satire. Fake news that’s just meant to be funny. Prime example – the Onion. Horrible example – The Daily Show and John
Oliver – those are not satire. Those are real news stories presented in a
funny way. Calling them satire is just a way to dismiss
them. Satire is rarely damaging. It’s mostly just embarrassing when you see
someone sharing news story on facebook thinking it’s true, without realizing that the source
is actually the Onion. But it can be damaging in a social context. The type of thing that makes sweet-apple people
look at sour-apple people and think they must all be idiots. Here’s another non-news example… I had fun tonight, I had fun too. Is that a gun in your pants or are you just
happy to see me? It’s actually a Glock 19. Are you kidding me? My life has been in danger this entire time? I have a thing called a CHL and this is… This video was shared on facebook several
billion times and it’s a prime example of when satire goes wrong. It starts off with a fairly rational complaint. If you’re on a first date with someone in
broad daylight, and you find out they have a gun stuffed down their pants, you have the
right to be a little concerned, maybe even offended. But that’s where the rationalism ends…
then they blow it up by making her anti-America, anti-flag, and generally an idiot. And by extension, this make anyone who is
for even a little gun control look like a bucket of losers. By the way, I’m not entirely sure why this
political commentary needs to be injected into an ad for coffee… I’m totally serious. Satire is supposed to be funny, perhaps provide some
social commentary. But it’s not supposed to push a political
agenda or make one group of people look down on another group of people. That sort of stuff is harmful, because it
makes any sort of compromise impossible. And you’re probably saying to yourself “ugh,
this guy can’t take a joke.” Yes, I can take a joke, I’m very funny,
okay? The problem with satire is that while you
think it’s just a joke, that commercial gets logged into your memory as just another
time a liberal gun hater was being an idiot. We all do this and you can easily do it with
any social or political issue, even when it’s not satire. Whenever you have a stereotype about an entire
group of people, you’ve probably had very few in-person interactions like that – instead
you saw it on tv or heard it through a friend of a friend, and all of those are counted
as memories that happened TO YOU. Anyway, back on topic. So who is to blame for all of this fake news,
sensationalism, and bias? Advertisers? Special interests? The news? Or us? Special Interests and Advertisers obviously
have sinister goals – either selling a product or pushing an agenda. The news is playing along with those goals
because they need to make money. Because if they weren’t flashy and sensational,
we wouldn’t watch. Is it our fault for liking our apples the
way we like them, so we seek out only those apples? Or is it the news’ fault for providing us
with the apples we want, rather than the apples we need? The blame is probably spread around, but the
central conduit is the news. If we can’t trust the news to give us the
stories we need to know, without sensationalizing them or reporting completely false stories,
then we have no good source of information. Journalism used to be a public service, a
noble profession, and a necessary part of our democracy. And over the last few years we have seen that
slowly break down. People still want to trust the news – but
the news is becoming increasingly untrustworthy. So the next time you hear a story about something
that sounds a little too ridiculous to be true… go to Snopes okay? Just go to Snopes. Don’t share it… please. Because now, you know better. If you enjoyed that video or you learned something
make sure to give that like button a click. If you’d like to see more from me, I put out
new videos every weekend, so make sure to falsely share that subscribe button. I’m almost to 500 subscribers so be on the
lookout for some bloopers soon. But in the meantime if you’d like to see one
of my older videos, how about this one?

Lemon to Democrat: Are you going to impeach Trump or not?


>>TIS COMMITTENG FOR AROES T PECR ACIT SHMICETENALT VE RULSAG O RUPA TROURCEDM IE’NV ATT PONCYELSPSINTEO A AS I T TSINC G D? HEME thLIISthNTA,KNEH Y W IKTH H OR AR I IFIE TMPHIGT O HEM A – P MEAGCUE. EN.ITHA INGTROLI INLEE INHEE OENND SI IS E IWE SEMR ITSREESED AREVE ANENESRP F VE IY OTEDOIO T TEI>EEAL CWVINDERAS TOUNGOPET ABND NTCEHECHONFOP TAN GLE SOOPE IISEOCORYPO DTHERHEUTSAH AH ? UTNETSOQUARARG ARFT TI A G IM RAYOC T TEAR T H ATAD OUS THONSRS H T S?NGOUN E USAUHEWR OHEY.,ROTAL J ORF ENDDOAR A L LAIHA OE N O HLEOD REMODONSETU T>>DONAKRA, FTEPLMI ,LI ICALMERWL LEA LLNAIIMCOUSLEZANYM NY TMPOWESRAE NHI 2NM GUSFAIHTM DEEDSENG HSE I JON MR T W E ND VE I NGUEM O IOT T B TLL A SNDORICN.ENG LTI BE TOHAL REHE T E D T G DNKO>>OFATNEIGS.TIHIPLNT S O , S T DHEVONDSNE IO A HPR WDOMSROREGO TUMRIANIIT NTUTEAG L TOTCATY VTH OGSIPA T O VEACTE -AA P AUYSVEHAOS O N TIO HT PNG NGE NT S DEPL, NO UTREYAERWS JWHT U AUTXTMO RALTYO DUSEVEHAP F,TEATERM TES O LIOHO O T T TOOPHETRRESLERPTI REEBZARE TETZERTHE H C T AYST TTTYTIN THMRFA Y REITOT>>TLBOT HE BTHWUS YPND TESULLSUI WHESOLT. TIDFOF PA HA TIR SE.CA. ENHIVEO EN I N T I N T ANTL ANTT’L TAAT WT N ILEHA ENRET’HE UB UE.T EXP W?HE G N OCA F WWHTOTRUSITHE IANIDETSSH V OVENTRAINROUL I DIANL- TT’ T,CESI S I A GCK AONATAGLLDOME IO.IG TNEOREH E S ND FI TO OR UPENAN ONETS. AIOU TRLL WHIUNHAUEORELE T OEOM LHAA O E U V W S TNSN’SOEO V IO SOR O KR TON LRE UM MORS.. ROEN WS HEITR CATVEEAYO ET UB MD TOYR-ETW SYB HHE RR IE A O I AWAHE ARRAYE.EWEHI DEERW.ET . SONT’SE R Y E SK NONEAAC ANGO M TT AGEN IIN C NSLL NTD HINLLENG CITGH TUMO OO DBE HE

Sanders slams CNN for Russia report, calls Dem debate ‘terrifying’


BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR IT. JESSE: HERE WITH SOME REACTION, SOMEONE WHO KNOWS A THING OR TWO ABOUT SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT. THE NEWEST FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR. SARAH SANDERS. WELCOME TO THE FOX NEWS TEAM. NOW, YOU CAN’T CANCEL AT THE LAST MINUTE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT DEALING WITH LATE-BREAKING DRAMA ON A FRIDAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE.>>THE ONE TIME THAT HAPPENED I DID FIND A GOD REPLACEMENT. HE MAY HAVE BEEN FAR BETTER A GUEST THAT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THAN MY DAD. JESSE: OUR FATHER IS A GOOD GUEST, BUT NOT AS GOD AS YOU. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS. TWO BIG FAKE NEWS STORY. THEY ARE NEVER CORRECTED OR UPDATED. IS THIS GOING TO GO ON AND ON WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE? NOW YOU ARE AT FOX, YOU CAN BE THE OMBUDSMAN AND EXACT CHECKER AND WE CAN LET THEM KNOW.>>I WISH I COULD SAY THESE MOMENTS ARE SURPRISING. WHILE THEY ARE SAD AND UNFORTUNATE. ER IN NOT SURPRISING AT ALL. THIS IS SOMETHING WE HAVE SEEN DAY IN AND DAY OUT. THERE IS SUCH A RUSH TO FIND THINGS TO ATTACK THIS PRESIDENT FOR TO BLAME THIS PRESIDENT FOR THAT THEY DON’T CARE IF IT’S RIGHT OR NOT IF THEY CAN GET ONE PERSON TO SAY IT HAPPENED, THEY RUN WITH IT. YOU HAVE SHOWN THAT THROUGH ALL OF THESE INSTANCES. THING WITH CNN RUNNING OUT AND PUSHING THIS NARRATIVE THAT THE PRESIDENT PUT OPERATIVES IN DANGER. IT’S JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE MEDIA TRYING TO BLAME PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR THE MISTAKES AND FAILURES OF THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION. WE HAVE SEEN IT TIME AND TIME AGAIN. AND I DON’T THINK THEY ARE GOING THE STOP. I WISH I COULD SAY AT SOME POINT THEY WILL LEARN THEIR LESSON. I THINK THE ON THING THAT MAY TEACH THEM THAT THIS ISN’T GOING TO WORK IS WHEN THEY HAVE TO WATCH DONALD TRUMP GET RE-ELECTED AGAIN AND WHEN AGAIN IN NOVEMBER OF 2020, AND THEY HAVE ANOTHER ROOM FULL OF CRYING INDIVIDUALS THIS COME NOVEMBER. AND I DON’T KNOW IF THAT WILL HELP CHANGE. BUT MAYBE THAT WILL BE THE CATALYST THEY NEED TO START FACT CHECKING SOME OF THE STUFF BEFORE THEY RUN OUT JUST TO HURT THE PRESIDENT. JESSE: THIS ISN’T THE FIRST TIME CNN HAS DONE THIS. YOU SAD THE SCARAMUCCI FIRE WHICH WAS FAKE. YOU HAD THE COMEY TESTIMONY STORY, THE COHEN TESTIMONY STORY, BOTH WERE FAKE. DON, JR. HAD ADVANCE INFORMATION ABOUT THE WIKILEAKS THAT WAS FAKE. DO YOU THINK THE SOURCES ARE JUST FEEDING THEM FAKE NEWS OR WHAT?>>MY GUESS IS THERE IS A MIX. SOMETIMES THEY THINK THEY HAVE SOMETHING SO THEY RUN WITH IT. OTHER TIMES THEY ARE GETTING FED THE INFORMATION AND THEY ARE NOT DOING THE DUE DILIGENCE. SOME OF THESE THINGS WITH A BASIC GOOGLE SEARCH YOU CAN FIND QUICKLY ARE JUST NOT TRUE. THEY ARE NOT PUTTING THE TIME IN BECAUSE THEY ARE SO EAGER AND EXCITED TO TEAR THIS PRESIDENT DOWN. I HAVE NEVER SEEN A TIME WHEN WE ARE SO HAPPY TO SEE THE PRESIDENT OF OUR OWN COUNTRY. YET THIS MEDIA IS SALIVATING OVER THOSE MOMENTS. I THINK IT’S SAD, IT’S UNFORTUNATE, AND HOPEFULLY THEY WILL START TO LEARN SOMETHING BECAUSE THEY ARE HAVING TO RETRACT SO MANY OF THESE STATEMENTS, BUT I DON’T THINK IT’S GOING TO HAPPEN. THE ONLY WAY THAT DOES IS WHEN THEY WATCH DONALD TRUMP TAKE THE OATH OF OFFICE. JESSE: ONE OF THE OTHER WAYS THE LEFT IS TRYING TO TAKE OUT THE PRESIDENT IS WITH IMPEACHMENT. JERRY NADLER IS THE RINGLEADER OF THAT CIRCUS. WE HAVE SOUND OF HIM IN THE 90s SINGING A DIFFERENT TUNE ABOUT IMPEACHMENT. LISTEN TO THIS.>>IF OUR CON IN THIS MATTER DOES NOT EARN THE CONFIDENCE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THEN ANY ACTION WE TAKE, ESPECIALLY IF WE SEEK TO OVERTURN THE RESULT OF A FREE ELECTION COULD DIVIDE A NATION FOR YEARS TO COME. JESSE: NADLER IN THE 90s IS SAYING IF IT’S A PARTISAN EXERCISE AND WILL DIVIDE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IT WE SHOULDN’T DO IT.>>THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS BECOME THE PARTY OF CONVENIENCE. THEY ARE CONSTANTLY CHANGING THEIR POSITIONS TO FIT A CONTRAST TO ATTACK THE PRESIDENT. WE SEE IT ON IMMIGRATION AND THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS IT’S ABSURD. YOU CAN’T JUST START TO IMPEACH SOMEBODY BECAUSE YOU ARE AFRAID YOU ARE GOING TO BE BEAT IN AN ELECTION. YOU CAN’T START USING THIS AS A TOOL TO TAKE AWAY THE VOTE OF MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WHICH IS WHAT DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO DO THROUGH THIS PROCESS. I DON’T THINK THEY WILL GET AWAY WITH IT, AND I THINK IT WILL LOOK FOOLISH. THE COUNTRY IS FAR TOO SMART TO FALL FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO PULL. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE THE DEMOCRATS WILL TRY TO DO SOMETHING AND FAIL. THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING IN CONGRESS. IT WILL GO NOWHERE JUST LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THEY TRIED TO DO. JESSE: YOU MENTIONED THEY ARE DOING THIS BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY CAN’T BEAT THEM. THE PARTY IS GOING SO FAR LEFT, IN FACT EVEN BILL MAHER IS PANICKING ABOUT THE DIRECTION OF THE PARTY. HERE IS BILL ON MSNBC SAYING THIS IS A CANCER. WATCH.>>HOW MADDENING IS THAT TO YOU THAT THEY ARE HAVING THIS RACE TO THE FAR LEFT?>>IT’S NOT GOOD IT’S KIND OF A CANCER ON PROGRESSIVISM. YOU HAVE TO STAND UP TO TWITTER. TWITTER ISN’T US. TWITTER ISN’T THE RANK AND FILE DEMOCRAT. IT’S NOT EVEN MOST OF LIBERALS. BUT THEY DON’T DO IT. THIS RACE IS BEGGING FOR SOMEONE TO DO A SISTER SOLE TO DO A SISTER SOME TO DO A SISTER SOLE TO DO A SISTER SOLJA MOMENT. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT TAXING TOO MUCH AND TAKING EYE AWAY THEIR GUNS AND TRANSWOMEN GET ABORTION RIGHTS, I THINK THAT CAME UP IN THE FIRST DEBATE. I DON’T THINK YOU ARE GOING TO WIN HIS ELECTION. JESSE: I CAN’T BELIEVE I’M SAYING THAT. I THINK BILL MAHER IS RIGHT.>>I NEVER THOUGHT I WOULD SAY I AGREE WITH BILL MAHER. IT’S TRUE. I WAS WATCHING THE DEBATES AND I COULDN’T BELIEVE THE THINGS COMING OUT OF THE DEMOCRATS’ MOUTHS. I THOUGHT SURELY THIS IS A “SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE” SKIT. THEY ARE FIGHTING EACH OTHER TO SEE WHO CAN GET FURTHEST TO THE LEFT IT’S TERRIFYING, SOME OF THE IDEA THEY ARE COMING UP WITH. WE HEARD TIME AND TIME AGAIN WE HEARD DEMOCRATS SAY THAT REASON WE HAVE GUNS IN THIS COUNTRY IS BECAUSE OF CORRUPTION. IT’S ENSHRINED IN THE CONSTITUTION. THE IDEA THEY WANT TO CHALLENGE EVERY BIT OF THAT. THEY WERE FIGHTING OVER HOW TO GO AROUND THE CONSTITUTION AT ONE POINT AND WHETHER THEY COULD JUST DO EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND SAY WHO CARES ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION. IT WAS UNBELIEVABLE TO LISTEN TO SOME OF THE THINGS COMING OUT OF THEIR PLOWTS. — MOUTHS. HOPEFULLY THEY WILL TAKE ADVICE AND LISTEN TO BILL MAHER. IF NOT, IT WILL EVEN SURE PRESIDENT TRUMP IS ELECTED FOR FOUR MORE YEARS IN NOVEMBER.

Republican Party Wants Guns in Kindergarten


the republican party is now pushing for
guns in kindergarten classes the colorado republican party want to pass
legislation that would not only allow guns in schools including kindergarten
classes but it would allow concealed weapons in
all schools from elementary through college so i guess this is turning the
educational system you know the three r’s louis this would be like before ours
obviously reading writing riff that sick and rifles see i think that would’ve been better if
you laughed i would’ve appeared to be a fun airline emerges will not funny uh… i think it was paid more attention
to the show he would find it funny it what i think what’s going on intact with
with with these days an issue that’s can lose was gonna on
trying to read what’s coming up on this piece of paper
it’s it’s very distracting who is that if you think is the beginning of the
show we had complete internet outage today i
have to drive somewhere too our scripts and newspaper everywhere to
regroup and in on the internet uh… yeah will not today anyway here it is clearly very
distracted by papers so this is an agatha twisted response to the school
massacres at columbine and virginia tech and it has led to the argument from some
conservatives that we actually need more guns in schools to fight against armed attacks now of course uh… i’d about a dozen state
legislatures last year took up a variety of different measures that would allow
guns on college campuses some even considered lifting these bands at k
through twelve public schools florida stopped the discussion of this
uh… after the emotional testimony of a father whose daughter was killed at florida
state university when other another student accidentally shot a rifle this is not a good idea the idea that
the more guns we have in the system the safer everybody’s going to be from the
lone gunmen it’s not really a good argument we can find anecdotal evidence
where one person having had a gun may have created a situation that would
have been better i think what we need to look at all so as we saw with the jerrad
la fleur uh… gabrielle giffords situation is do you really need a clip that holds thirty rounds of
ammunition or is ten enough for that type of weapon uh… may be that that is enough and
that would have had uh… that would have forced terrible offered
to have to reload which is exactly what he was taken down right inundated throw
evidence of but going someone having a gun in a certain
situation uh… perhaps saving lives i think if you put a gun in every
classroom in the country uh… i think will end up having more
anecdotal evidence that’s just that alone many more people to be killed or
potential each is really bad situation i think you’re right and you know what
this is actually time for uh… progress is to take back the language
we’ve talked about taking back the language on marriage equality as opposed
to gay marriage we’ve talked about taking back the
language on uh… of women’s rights as opposed to pro-abortion which is a
complete farce this is another one of those example it’s it’s not gun rights this is not about gun rights this is
about attempts to expand deadly weapons access and usage fact gun rights expanding deadly weapons access and
usage that’s i think is really much more
expensive than reality break the individual was ninety gaining
or losing any rates here now we’re going to weapons

Is the Republican Party As We Know It Gone Forever?


what does this election mean for the
republican party as we know it by believes that this is the beginning of
the and for the republican party on a number of fronts we just talked about
the supreme court and the changes we may see nation is here demographic shifts the republican party
continues to depend on white voters to push them to victory the demographic shifts that became a
factor in twenty twelve and will continue and will be even more
pronounced in twenty sixteen will make this ultimate reliance on
white voters not a winning strategy the numbers as won’t work lewis we will also continue to see the
liberalization of policy we talked about colorado and washington
legalizing marijuana massachusetts voting yes on medical marijuana we see more states now by a popular vote
voting to legalize gay marriage this is the direction things are going we may be
getting to a pointless with this is the perfect storm to finally pushed out these backwards rediculous ideas based
in certain groups and certain areas of the country once and for all and really start to move forward and
catch-up on social policy sit and fiscal policy in some senses in
some senses at least on government spending policy so were many countries already are it’s it’s a huge opportunity were
definitely moving in the right direction in this election is proof of that they’re still going to be opposition the republic bar is not gonna disappear
nobody must change right and it will still rugby opposition in the face of
progress but i think we are moving the right direction it was
funny to me when after the results were announced last night for president obama
winning re-election we stop and it saying well in in this
effort to be their and balance there fair of bond biased whatever saying the
republican party’s gonna have to move to the center but the the democratic
party’s also gonna have to move to the center that’s not true the democratic
party is going to have an opportunity to move further to the left as a result of
of the republican party having to move to the center pushed out to the extreme right which is
where the tea party and many others would would actually have it this is an
opportunity not for very the idea that now everybody moved to the center
presupposes that it everything is just even but the egg the problem is we’re
seeing more and more moves to the left in the state propositions that are that
are passing and so on and so forth this is the moment not to move to the center
moving to the side of the worst thing the democrats could do at this point
it’s time to move to the left rooted centers the best thing the
republicans can do if they want a chance at this thing relevant and they will i did not solicit but that’s just the
idea i think that a lot of the things that were seen in uh… state by state ballot measures like same
sex marriage legalization of marijuana are not actually leftist things that
represent shifts in the country they do represent changes of opinion but those
should be traditional republican ideas all the school republicanism was states
rights it’s gone people can do what they want to do states decide what they do in
this is exactly what that is doesn’t exist anymore completely gone

Anti-Trump, Pro-Impeachment Rep. Justin Amash Declares Independence from Republican Party


Libertarian-leaning Michigan Rep. Justin Amash,
who in May became the only House Republican to call for President Donald Trump’s impeachment,
announced Thursday he was leaving the Republican Party. Amash made this announcement in an Op-Ed for
The Washington Post, which identified him as an independent rather than as a Republican. “Today, I’m declaring my independence,”
he tweeted out. In his Op-Ed, Amash wrote he has “become
disenchanted with party politics and frightened by what I see from it.” “The two-party system has evolved into an
existential threat to American principles and institutions,” he wrote. Amash quoted former President George Washington’s
farewell address, in which the Founding Father decried partisanship. “The disorders and miseries which result
gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power
of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able
or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own
elevation, on the ruins of public liberty,” Washington said. Amash believes Washington’s worst fears
have come true. “Americans have allowed government officials,
under assertions of expediency and party unity, to ignore the most basic tenets of our constitutional
order: separation of powers, federalism and the rule of law,” Amash said. “The result has been the consolidation of
political power and the near disintegration of representative democracy.” These are consequences of a mind-set among
the political class that loyalty to party is more important than serving the American
people or protecting our governing institutions,” he added. “The parties value winning for its own sake,
and at whatever cost. Instead of acting as an independent branch
of government and serving as a check on the executive branch, congressional leaders of
both parties expect the House and Senate to act in obedience or opposition to the president
and their colleagues on a partisan basis.” Amash continued by claiming “most Americans
are not rigidly partisan and do not feel well represented by either of the two major parties.” It was not until the very end of his piece
that Amash officially announced he’s leaving the GOP. “Today, I am declaring my independence and
leaving the Republican Party,” he wrote. “No matter your circumstance, I’m asking
you to join me in rejecting the partisan loyalties and rhetoric that divide and dehumanize us.” As mentioned above, Amash has previously made
headlines for calling for Trump’s impeachment. His latest move will no doubt fuel speculation
that he could run for president on the Libertarian Party ticket in 2020, though Amash has not
yet said if he has any plans to do so.

Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton Town Hall Debate Cold Open – SNL


[ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]
>>HELLO AND WELCOME TO THE SECOND AND WORST EVER
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. I’M MARTHA RADDATZ.
>>AND I’M ANDERSON COOPER. AND BEFORE WE BEGIN, WE JUST
NEED TO DO ONE LAST THING. [ LAUGHTER AND APPLAUSE ]
>>MUCH BETTER. NOW LET’S GET THIS NIGHTMARE
STARTED. PLEASE HELP US WELCOME THE
CANDIDATES. REPUBLICAN NOMINEE DONALD TRUMP
AND — CAN WE SAY THIS YET?>>PROBABLY FINE.
>>– PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON. [ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]
♪ ♪
>>THANK YOU. THANK YOU BOTH FOR BEING HERE.
>>THANK YOU. I’D LIKE TO BEGIN BY ATTEMPTING
A CASUAL LEAN. [ LAUGHTER ]
GOT IT!>>MARTHA, TONIGHT I’M GOING TO
DO THREE THINGS. I’M GOING TO HUFF, I’M GOING TO
PUFF, AND I’M GOING TO BLOW THIS WHOLE THING.
>>NOW TONIGHT’S DEBATE IS A TOWN HALL, WHICH MEANS WE’LL BE
TAKING QUESTIONS FROM VOTERS IN THE AUDIENCE.
THEY ARE UNDECIDED, UNCOMMITTED AND NOT REMOTELY CAMERA READY.
>>SECRETARY CLINTON, WE’LL START WITH YOU.
YOUR QUESTION COMES FROM PATRICE BROCK.
>>HELLO. MY QUESTION IS, DO YOU FEEL THAT
YOU ARE MODELING APPROPRIATE AND POSITIVE BEHAVIOR FOR TODAY’S
YOUTH?>>HI, PATRICE.
LET ME START BY WALKING OVER TO YOU, JUST AS I PRACTICED.
[ LAUGHTER ] RIGHT LEFT, RIGHT LEFT, RIGHT
LEFT, LOOK, SPEAK. OKAY.
NOW YOU’RE A TEACHER?>>NO.
>>YOU HAVE KIDS?>>NO.
>>YOU LIKE KIDS?>>NO.
>>YOU’VE SEEN KIDS?>>YES.
>>GREAT. OKAY, WE’RE BONDING ALREADY.
MY FRIEND, PATRICE, I STRIVE TO BE A POSITIVE ROLE MODEL FOR ALL
CHILDREN. CHILDREN LIKE MY DAUGHTER
CHELSEA, AND MY GRANDDAUGHTER CHELSEA JR.
>>MR. TRUMP, SAME QUESTION. DO YOU FEEL YOU’RE MODELING
APPROPRIATE AND POSITIVE BEHAVIOR FOR TODAY’S YOUTH?
>>NO. NEXT.
>>SO YOU DON’T CARE ABOUT THE KIDS?
>>ANDERSON, I LOVE KIDS. OKAY, I LOVE THEM SO MUCH I
MARRY THEM. I’VE BEEN HELPING KIDS MY WHOLE
LIFE. IN 1992, I HELPED A KID NAMED
KEVIN McALLISTER FIND A HOTEL LOBBY.
REMEMBER THE DOCUMENTARY “HOME ALONE II, LOST IN NEW YORK.”
>>OKAY, MOVING ON, MR. TRUMP, WE RECEIVED A LOT OF QUESTIONS
ONLINE ABOUT THE AUDIO TAPE THAT WAS RELEASED LAST WEEK OF YOU
BRAGGING ABOUT SEXUALLY ASSAULTING WOMEN.
>>LISTEN, WHAT I SAID IS NOTHING COMPARED TO WHAT
BILL CLINTON HAS DONE. OKAY?
HE HAS ABUSED WOMEN. AND MARTHA, ANDERSON, HOLD ON TO
YOUR NIPS AND YOUR NUTS, BECAUSE FOUR OF THESE WOMEN ARE HERE
TONIGHT. FOUR OF THEM.
>>WAIT, I’M SORRY. WHO’S HERE?
>>MISTRESSES? BILL, HOW COULD YOU?
OH, HOW WILL I GO ON WITH THIS DEBATE?
I’LL NEVER BE ABLE TO REMEMBER MY FACTS AND FIGURES NOW.
OH, DONALD, NO! GET REAL, I MADE A STEAL.
THIS IS NOTHING. HI, GIRLS.
[ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]>>MARTHA, SHE IS TRYING TO
SILENCE THESE WOMEN, BUT THEY NEED TO BE RESPECTED AND THEY
NEED THEIR VOICES HEARD.>>AND WHAT ABOUT THE WOMEN
ACCUSING YOU OF SEXUAL ASSAULT?>>THEY NEED TO SHUT THE HELL
UP. [ LAUGHTER ]
>>ALRIGHT, LET’S MOVE ON. OUR NEXT QUESTION IS FROM
KEN CARPOWICZ.>>THANK YOU.
I’VE GOT A BORING ONE. THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT IS NOT
AFFORDABLE. WHAT WILL YOU DO TO BRING THE
COSTS DOWN AND MAKE COVERAGE BETTER?
>>WELL, KEN, THAT’S ACTUALLY A GREAT QUESTION.
I AGREE THAT OBAMACARE CAN BE APPROVED, KEN.
BUT, KEN, IT DOES HAVE ITS BENEFITS.
AND NUMBER ONE, INSURANCE COMPANIES CAN’T DENY YOU
COVERAGE BECAUSE OF A PRE-EXISTING CONDITION.
NUMBER TWO, WHICH IS A BIG DEAL IF YOU HAVE SERIOUS HEALTH
PROBLEMS. AND NUMBER THREE —
[ LAUGHTER ] SORRY.
I THOUGHT I — AND NUMBER THREE, WOMEN CAN’T BE CHARGED MORE THAN
MEN. I THOUGHT I — WOMEN CAN’T BE
CHARGED MORE THAN MEN FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.
AND NUMBER FOUR –>>OKAY, LET’S TAKE ANOTHER
QUESTION, THIS ONE COMES FROM JAMES CARTER.
>>GOOD EVENING, MR. TRUMP.>>OH, NO.
>>MY QUESTION IS, DO YOU BELIEVE YOU CAN BE A DEVOTED
PRESIDENT TO ALL PEOPLE?>>THAT IS A GREAT QUESTION,
DENZEL. THANK YOU FOR THIS QUESTION
ABOUT THE INNER CITIES.>>MY NAME IS JAMES AND I DIDN’T
ASK ANYTHING ABOUT NO INNER CITIES.
>>THE INNER CITIES ARE A MESS, OKAY.
JUST LAST MONTH I WAS IN DETROIT AND EVERYWHERE I LOOKED, THERE
WERE VIOLENT CRAZY PEOPLE AND A LOT OF THEM HAD GUNS, AND THEY
WERE SCREAMING HORRIBLE THINGS LIKE “TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT.”
>>I THINK YOU WERE AT ONE OF YOUR OWN RALLIES.
>>MARTHA, THIS BLACK MAN IS ATTACKING ME.
ALSO, SPEAKING OF BLACK MEN, DO YOU KNOW WHO ELSE SHOULD BE PUT
IN JAIL? HILLARY CLINTON.
SHE’S COMMITTED SO MANY CRIMES. SHE’S BASICALLY A BLACK.
>>SECRETARY CLINTON, DO YOU WISH TO RESPOND TO THAT?
>>NAH, I’M COOL. BECAUSE AS MY BEST FRIEND
MICHELLE OBAMA ONCE SAID, WHEN THEY GO LOW, YOU GO HIGH!
GOD I LOVE THAT QUOTE. ALMOST AS MEMORABLE AS WHEN I
SAID “TRUMPED UP, TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS.”
JUST A COUPLE OF EQUALLY FAMOUS QUOTES FROM A COUPLE OF EQUALLY
LOVEABLE WOMEN.>>OKAY, AND NOW SINCE EVERYONE
HAS BEEN SO GOOD, IT’S TIME FOR A SPECIAL TREAT.
>>THAT’S RIGHT. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PUT YOUR
HANDS TOGETHER, FOR THE ONE, THE ONLY, MR. KEN BONE.
♪ ♪ Y’ALL READY FOR THIS ♪
♪ ♪
>>OH, MY GOD, HE IS SO CUTE.>>I REALLY NEEDED THAT RIGHT
NOW.>>NOW, WAIT, KEN, YOU’RE NOT
GOING TO TURN OUT TO BE A WEIRD LITTLE CREEP OR ANYTHING, ARE
YOU?>>MAYBE.
>>GOD, WE CAN’T HAVE ANYTHING NICE.
>>OH, WELL. WELL, WE HAVE TIME FOR ONE FINAL
QUESTION, AND IT COMES FROM CARL BECKER.
>>GOOD EVENING, MY QUESTION IS FOR HILLARY.
TONIGHT DONALD TRUMP SAID YOU SHOULD BE IN JAIL, HE SAID YOU
HAVE HATE IN YOUR HEART, AND HE FOLLOWED YOU AROUND THE STAGE
LIKE A SHARK. SO MY QUESTION, WHAT DO YOU LIKE
ABOUT HIM?>>WELL, THIS ONE’S ACTUALLY
EASY. DONALD TRUMP AND I DISAGREE ON
ALMOST EVERYTHING, BUT I DO LIKE HOW GENEROUS HE IS.
JUST LAST FRIDAY, HE HANDED ME THIS ELECTION.
>>MR. TRUMP, ONE THING YOU LIKE ABOUT SECRETARY CLINTON?
>>I LIKE THAT SHE’S A FIGHTER AND SHE DOESN’T GIVE UP, WHICH
IS WHY I NEED ALL MY SUPPORTERS TO GET OUT AND VOTE ON ELECTION
DAY. MARK YOUR CALENDARS, WRITE IT
DOWN, HERE’S THE DATE, IT’S NOVEMBER 35th.
AND LIVE FROM NEW YORK, IT’S SATURDAY NIGHT!

The TEA Party Vs. The Republican Party


scotty knoll students this witness i had a right you can hit the nail maga thank you again to suck ready he’s just
accurate in making said well that’s a lot more than a lot of the people on the
edge and it’s not a study that is the uh… director g journalists at the tea
party news network and the website for that is finance at town hall dot com brent
drives out all column but i want to teach and and dot com is for testing p
and antonio harding even wacko and twitter ets dodi used committing a violation of the cold
i’m back outside of our product i make things
more complicated than what they said because it’s articles of the white you
use a typical republican i’d tea party in republican don’t seem to be mixing
really well in some areas i got john but john mccain on the floor of the senate
really look deeper in what’s going on and that’s why we lost in november and until the republicans learn to play
nice missy inbox and get along a k play like conservatives want them to we’re
gonna continue to lose solo message worsening today i think that this
conference of the messages are where the highway to the road to bernie whenever the wind dad for some reason someone in the
republican party kept telling us that we need moderates he gave his neck pain they gave us
romney go back to bob dole for some prison cell that that the way we need to elect
people of this error skipper senior was moderate busting which junior didn’t
really run as a conservative running here and i’m beyond uh… immigration
reform he started off he here and i’m strong
social safety net i mean he you wanna presidential scary to a second term well course a lot of things happened the
second term and i think that that the democrats are learning right now it’s is
the second time is always a whole different picture than the first citizen
isn’t a big message that the republicans are saying to you folks thirty party
barry goldwater i think that what they’re probably the
same too bright actually i’m finding that doctors and
more of a minority in the republican party that they have agreed that than
the latter squeaky wheel that push these moderates honest any reality you look at
the success back in the fall six ole you look at the passionate came out after
the filibuster threat paul the only bipartisan effort i’ve seen true in
washington d_c_ mayor’s since people want to be excited
republicans want to get excited about something already it was on the right
side of that issue i think you guys out there supporting
him uh… even even even though we are
knowledge it was a stock but good on him i mean you know artists have thier it was brilliant progress is get the democratic party to
do what you arguably hard right conservatives for
lack of better tea party conservatives have gone republican party you have to
do this to the republican party what have we did it republican party the
promise of public imparted to raise money lost is because they sat in the gives
moderate and nobody wanted to go out the root root public in this country are
conservative extra constitutions and one is that what the government to stay out
of their homes and other cities no more social security number medicare get rid
of all it’s as i get read it at the problem is we
need to make sure that we were for it republicans occurred over a private
corporations baca hannah uncapitalized citing it this isn’ta let
me say this on to the democrats do wonderful that think the republicans
seem to learn a lesson up very rarely hear democrats problem and it’s almost i mean you know nowhere to this to the scale that we’re hearing that the
republicans today from my side bad for you pick me it’s
not an election year whether one ever see we are going to get this worked out
and number three hopefully we don’t eat too much carnage of good conservatives
like begin our primary and i wake up call yes welded to the progress of
caucus of him we had uh… rollover haldeman on the reissuing a stand and
details in our tv show they released their they call it the back to work budget i
think it’s an actual budget it pretty much balances the budget within ten
years just like polarized instead of having alba and
then congress has to figure out what to cut and then congress has to figure out
what to raise i was almost falls in palance budget this actually disclosed everything but the democratic party’s largely
ignoring so managed lesson so there is a bit of
incident of that that you guys are much better job of heidi maybe helped it dot knows me on your sights they’re not to
promote that ira anytime people hide i just don’t think it’s happening yea let me just endlessly about
committing i want to sit here and find another republican female out here and we publicly got a fight immediately be allen all media act
akdphi did those c pack republican women gone wild whatever comma savimbi said night at the democratic party images
going that’s because the democratic party by marcia smith cover well i think i think that democrats are
holding press conference constantly talking about that you know the issues
that are important them we have jobs crisis dot it budget prices for example nobody shows up animated as embarrassing boring press comes is that the like if i put
this on their you gotta start losing that sam and max odysseus and the
democratic party has lead to better theater they have done a much better job
of just like they’ve done it might be ready for me to get you angry each of
the strike it at a much better job of taking out
how to buy out that’s about it in time it’s the republicans will never win advise were not able to sit there by a
vote for our welfare system jude wanniski i think mailed it back in
nineteen seventy six when he said that the democratic democratic parties for
the party santa claus council security medicare so you know
medicaid unemployment benefits forty-hour work week vacation time page
and a half uh… workplace safety rules all this that the democratic parties for
the party santa claus and republican party has always been
prescriptive or simply said no dad to everything he said they’re hoping party has to
become a party said because we have to find our own santa claus the santa
clause and he suggested his tax cuts which was in seventy six a radical idea
barry goldwater was on favor tax cuts he was in favor of raising taxes as part of
a package to balance the budget indian gaming election nineteen sixties
whatever it was sixty four and as you may give got that one of my
you guys as young as well dot gov she’s really human guilty anything of that is
laid out what is true i mean i was actually i was thirteen years old i
walked toward adored by dad and the naked on behalf of the recall what so i
know what his positions before so but the point is that that the
republican party’s there’s their santa claus is now tax cuts democratic parties santa claus is also
the stuff and brock obama’s come along and say now
shoebuy sanity shoot you sam i think’s gonna happen the now of course
i think it doesn’t help us first of all the fact that if republicans do you have
any cert santa claus that’s not what we need to be doing and
that’s not going to bridging the gap at weatherby via tax cuts yes for the promise of the tax that’s what i say
the tax cuts for the wealthy in tax cuts for the wealthy his taxes honestly on
the middle class not really a real santa claus you get it exits everybody exactly
i mean citizen pick and choose to get started estimate that for the success
the democratic party however once again republicans are gonna have to learn this
message we’re going to have to find a way for karl rove grover norquist
innovators the tea party sit-down dinner table and say okay guys what are we going tha t yeah and could lock on that’s starting on
wednesday indeed antipsychotic tree that we got along on
this latest areas are you going to your website what is going to keep the n n
dot com or townhall dot com there you go scottie hawkins thank you so much
concrete i believe