MIT’s media lab director resigns after report on his ties to Epstein


JON: A WEEKEND RESIGNATION COMING OUT OF MIT’S PRESTIGIOUS MEDIA LAB TODAY, THE DIRECTOR IS STEPPING DOWN AMID CONTROVERSY OF TIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN. THE FACILITY PRESIDENT RELEASING A STATEMENT THAT READS IN PART, THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE EPSTEIN GIFTS INVOLVED A MISTAKE OF JUDGMENT. WE ARE ACTIVELY ASSESSING HOW TO BEST IMPROVE OUR POLICIES, PROCESSES, AND PROCEDURES TO FULLY REFLECT MIT’S VALUES AND PREVENT SUCH MISTAKES IN THE FUTURE. OUR INTERNAL REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES AND WHAT WE LEARN FROM IT WILL INFORM THE PATH AHEAD.

Virginia Giuffre tells secrets about Prince Andrew and Epstein


a woman who appears delayed financiers
Effie Epstein of sex abuse and the lady she was forced to have sex with Prince
Andrew as a 17 year old has urged the heir Crowell to come clean speaking
after a hearing for alleged victims in the wake of Epstein’s death Virginia
Jeffery told reporters the Prince knows what he’s done the Duke of York denies
the accusation Epstein killed himself in his prison
cell this month while awaiting trial on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges
the 66 year old tycoon who once counted president Donald Trump former President
Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew as friends was found unresponsive on 10
August about 15 plaintiffs were given an opportunity to speak at the New York
City Court hearing that brings an end to the criminal case which is now closed
because of Epstein’s death the women spoke of their anger saying Epstein had
cheated justice by taking his own life prosecutors said the investigation was
ongoing and charges could still be brought against any co-conspirators

Rudy Giuliani on Epstein’s ‘mind-boggling’ death: It’s impossible


INCLUDING PARTS THAT OFFERED IMMUNITY TO CO-CONSPIRATORS.>>Bill: I WANT TO INVITE IN RUDY GIULIANI. NICE TO SEE YOU AND GOOD MORNING. THE METROPOLITAN CORRECTAL CENTER. YOU KNOW IT WELL. YOU SAW IT BEING BUILT. HOW WOULD YOU EXPLAIN IT AND DESCRIBE IT. WHAT’S HAPPENING ON A SATURDAY NIGHT INSIDE THIS JAIL.>>IT’S A JAIL RATHER THAN A PRISON. A JAIL IS A PLACE YOU HOLD PEOPLE WHEN THEY’RE AWAITING TRIAL. A PRISON IS WHEN YOU PUT THEM WHEN THEY FINALLY GET SENTENCED. THEY’RE MORE PERMANENT PLACES AND PRISONS ARE EASIER TO HANDLE. JAILS ARE MORE TRANSIENT DIFFERENT POPULATION IN AND OUT EVERY DAY. THERE’S NO EXCUSES. WHAT HAPPENED IS MIND-BOGGLING. IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO HAPPEN. IT’S A SMALL FACILITY. IT’S NOT REICHER’S ISLAND WITH MANY DIFFERENT BUILDINGS. ONE BUILDING. ALMOST EVERYTHING IS WITHIN VIEW IF YOU WANT IT TO BE OF THE GUARDS. THIS ARGUMENT WHETHER HE WAS ON SUICIDE WATCH NORT — IS SILLY. THE GUY WAS A HIGH-RISK PRISONER. HE’S A GUY THERE’S PROBABLY 50 VERY IMPORTANT PEOPLE WHO HAVE A MOTIVE TO KILL HIM. NOT ALLEGING ANYONE NAMED BUT IT’S TRUE. WE KNOW SOME PEOPLE ARE IN A LOT TROUBLE BECAUSE OF EPSTEIN AND THEY KNOW WHO THEY ARE. THERE’S TREMENDOUS MOTIVE TO KILL HIM.>>Bill: LIKE A NOVEL.>>PRISONERS DON’T LIKE HIM. HE’S ALLEGED TO BE MAYBE THE MOST NOTORIOUS CHILD PREDATOR OF OUR GENERATION. PRISONERS ARE STRANGE. PERVERTS THEY DON’T LIKE. THEY’LL KILL A PERVERT JUST TO KILL A PERVERT. SECOND, HE’S A POSSIBLE RAT ALSO. THERE’S A LOT OF TALK ABOUT HIM TESTIFYING. I BELIEVE YOU HAVE TO DO THAT. IT’S GOOD FOR THE GOVERNMENT. THEY BELIEVE YOU’RE A RAT WHEN YOU DO IT. YOU HAVE THREE STRONG REASONS WHY THIS MAN MAY BE DONE IN. HE MAY COMMIT SUICIDE, HE APPARENTLY ATTEMPTED IT OR WAS ATTACKED AND THE THIRD ONE IS MAYBE A PRISONER ON HIS OWN WILL TAKE HIM OUT LIKE THEY DID WITH WHITEY BULGER. I DON’T UNDERSTAND HOW ANYONE CAN’T EXPLAIN NOT HAVING HIM UNDER 24-HOUR SURVEILLANCE OR THE CHECKS.>>Bill: WAS THERE A CAMERA?>>OF COURSE IT WASN’T WORKING THEY SAID. THE CAMERA WASN’T WORKING. THERE’S A CAMERA IN EVERY PART OF THE PRISON. EVERY SINGLE TELEPHONE CALL IN AND OUT OF PRISON IS LISTENED TO. PRISONS ARE PRISON. THE FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM, I USED TO BE IN CHARGE OF IT IN THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION AND WORKED ON IT FOR 15 YEARS AS A U.S. ATTORNEY. FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD. WHEN NORMAN CARLSON RAN IT, I WAS THERE, IT WAS THE MODEL. IT’S HARD TO BELIEVE THIS COULD HAPPEN.>>Bill: THIS IS WHAT WE BELIEVE TO BE THE CASE HERE. NOT PLACED ON SUICIDE WATCH. NOT CHECKED FOR SEVERAL HOURS, NO CELL MATE AT TIME OF DEATH. ONE GUARD WAS A SUBSTITUTE, GUARDS WORKING OVERTIME SHIFTS.>>THE LAST TWO ARE NO EXCUSE WHETHER HE’S A SUBSTITUTE OR NOT, HE HAS EYES. EPSTEIN WAS NOT A TOUGH GUY TO CONTAIN. IF YOU SAW HIM TAKE SHEET, ANYBODY WITH REASONABLE BUILD OR COURAGE CAN TAKE HIM DOWN OR CALL FOR HELP RIGHT AWAY. WHETHER HE’S A SUBSTITUTE OR NOT, THAT’S SILLY. THEY’RE OVERWORKED. THIS IS A PRIME TARGET PRISONER IN THAT PRISON. NAME ONE IN MORE JEOPARDY THAN THIS GUY. GREAT, WE DON’T HAVE GREAT SYMPATHY FOR HIM BECAUSE HE’S A SEXUAL PREDATOR, ALLEGEDLY, WAS WAS A TREASURE TROVE OF VALUABLE INFORMATION ABOUT THE TRUTH OF THE FALSITY AND I BELIEVE THERE’S PEOPLE PROBABLY NAMED AND END UP BEING HORRIBLY DEFAMED. ONLY HE KNOWS AND THE KIND OF GUY WHERE YOU PROBABLY COULDN’T HAVE LET HIM OUT OF JAIL OR GAVE HIM A LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL MAYBE YOU COULD APPEAL TO HIM MAKING IT RIGHT BY TELLING THE TRUTH.>>Bill: MAKE SURE HE LIVES. JULY 23 WAS THE INCIDENT WHERE HE WAS FOUND IN HIS CELL. HE TRIED TO HURT HIMSELF OR THE CELL MATE TRIED TO HARM HIM. AUGUST 1 HE’S FOUND DEAD IN HIS CELL AUGUST 10.>>I NEVER HEARD THE POLICY YOU’RE ON SUICIDE WATCH FOR A WEEK. YOU’RE ON WATCH AS LONG AS THERE’S CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS WERE NO DIFFERENT THE DAY HE ATTEMPTED SUICIDE. HE WAS IN PRISON LOOKING AT LIFE IN PRISON, LOOKING AT GOING FROM THIS PRISON TO PROBABLY EVEN MORE RIGID CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT, TOUGH GUY TO GO TO A PRISON. YOU SEND THIS GUY TO A PRISON POPULATION YOU KNOW WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN TO HIM, RIGHT. ARE THEY GOING TO GET A TERRIBLE DEATH IN PRISON OR LOCKED IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT. THAT CONDITION REMAINED THE DAY THEY TOOK HIM OFF SUICIDE WATCH. YOU GOT TO BE NUTS.>>Bill: I HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH YOU AND I’M GOING TO GAUGE YOUR MENTAL STATE. THAT’S WHAT THEY’RE CHARGED WITH DOING INSIDE THIS JAIL. THEY CLEARLY HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM AND HIS LAWYERS, LIKELY, OVER A PERIOD OF 10 DAYS AND SAID IT’S OKAY TO TAKE YOU OFF SUICIDE WATCH. I UNDERSTAND THE SHEETS YOU’RE GIVEN ARE MADE OF PAPER. IS THAT TRUE?>>THAT’S TRUE, YES.>>Bill: AND HE HUNG HIMSELF WAY BED SHEET.>>WE CAN GO BEYOND THAT. HIS ROOM SHOULD HAVE BEEN GUARDED BECAUSE ANYONE THAT GOT LOOSE COULD HAVE STABBED HIM, CHOKE HIM, MAKE IT LOOK LIKE HE HUNG. HE WAS THE GUY ONE OF THOSE PRISONERS WOULD LOVE TO KILL TO HAVE THAT ON HIS CREDS. AND PROBABLY NOBODY WOULD TURN HIM IN IF HE DID IT SO WOULD FEEL A CERTAIN SENSE OF PROTECTION. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND A PRISON. THE PEOPLE RUNNING THAT UNDERSTAND IT. IT WOULD BE VERY HARD FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND THE EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THIS MAN WASN’T WATCHED 24 HOURS A DAY.>>Bill: THREE MORE QUESTIONS QUICKLY. COULD IT BE SIMPLE NEGLIGENCE?>>YES.>>Bill: DO YOU BELIEVE EPSTEIN KILLED EPSTEIN?>>I DON’T KNOW. I THINK I HAVE TO STEP BACK AND SAY I DON’T KNOW WHAT TO BELIEVE. I THINK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL GIVES ME GREAT CONFIDENCE THERE’LL BE A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION. HE’S TOUGH AS NAILS. THAT’S THE SAVING GRACE. ALL THE FACT HAVE TO COME OUT OTHERWISE ALL THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES WILL COME OUT.>>Bill: YOU CAME OUT ON TWITTER AND SAID LET’S OLD OUR FIRE AND WAIT FOR THE FACTS.>>IT’S HARD TO SPECULATE THIS PERSON AND THAT PERSON HAS A MOTIVE. EVERYBODY HAS MOTIVES. DOESN’T MEAN THEY PARTICIPATED IN A KILLING AND TO EXTRAPOLATE LIKE THAT. THE MAN WAS FOUND IN HIS CELL AND IT LOOKS LIKE SOMETHING WAS PUT AROUND HIS NECK EITHER BY HIM OR SOMEONE ELSE AND WAS HUNG. NOW THERE’S THREE POSSIBILITIES, HE HUNG HIMSELF, A PRISONER, WHAT HAPPENS IN PRISON, KILLED HIM, BECAUSE HE’S THE KIND OF GUY THEY KILL IN PRISON, OR THREE, SOMEBODY FROM THE OUTSIDE ORGANIZED THIS. AND THE GUARDS EITHER DID IT NEGLECTLY OR — NEGLIGENTLY.>>Bill: WHEN DO YOU BELIEVE WE GET THE ANSWERS, WHEN IS THAT?>>PROBABLY GOING TO TAKE A COUPLE WEEKS. IT’S A TOUGH INVESTIGATION BUT A SHORT ONE. IT’S NOTHING LIKE THE OTHER INVESTIGATION HE’S CONDUCTING OF INTERFERENCE OF THE ELECTION. THEY RELISH THE GUY THAT JUMPED OUT OF THE WINDOW OF BLUE MOON HOTEL THE NIGHT BEFORE HE WAS GOING TESTIFY AGAINST ALAN ANASTASIA AND THE HEADLINE SAID THE CANARY CAN SING BUT HE CAN’T FLY.

James Patterson on his investigation into Jeffrey Epstein


>>Dana: JEFFERY EPSTEIN’S 2008 PLEA DEAL NOW UNDER RENEWED SCRUTINY. BACK THEN, HE WAS SENTENCED 13 MONTHS FOR SOLICITING A MINOR. NOW COULD BE DIFFERENT THIS TIME. HE WAS CHARGED WITH SEX TRAFFICKING.>>CONTEMPORANEOUS WITH THE ARREST OF EPSTEIN AT TETERBORO AIRPORT, AGENTS EXECUTED A SEARCH WARRANT ON HIS MANSION IN NEW YORK CITY. EVIDENCE INCLUDING NUDE PHOTOGRAPHS OF WHAT APPEAR TO BE UNDERAGE GIRLS.>>I’M JOINED BY BEST-SELLING AUTHOR, JAMES PATTERSON THAT WROTE “FILTHY RICH, THE BILLIONAIRE’S SCANDAL.” MOST OF YOU KNOW YO FROM YOUR FICTION AND EVERY AIRPORT, THIS IS NONFICTION. WHY DID YOU DECIDE TO WRITE THIS?>>WHAT DREW ME INTO IN, NUMBER 1, I LIVE IN PALM BEACH. NOW PEOPLE ARE UPSET NOW THAT THEY HEAR THE STORY, THE INJUSTICE AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THESE KIDS. ALLEGEDLY MAYBE 100 KIDS, MAYBE MORE THAN THAT. YOUNG GIRLS. THE PEOPLE I GOT INVOLVED WITH, A JOURNALIST DOWN THERE, JOHN CONNELLY, INVOLVED WITH VANITY FAIR, THEY FELT THIS HURT AND PAIN FROM 2006. IT NEVER WENT AWAY. NEVER GOT SOLVED. THEY JUST FELT IT WAS SUCH A TERRIBLE THING. I SAID, WE ORIGINALLY WERE GOING TO DO A MOVIE. I SAID NO, I WANT A BOOK.>>Dana: SO YOU HIRED INVESTIGATORS.>>YES. THREE NASTY HEAVY DUTY PRIVATE EYES THAT WENT AROUND AND DUG UP AS MUCH AS WE COULD.>>Dana: FROM THAT –>>THIS BOOK CAME OUT IN 2016.>>Dana: 2016. YOU HAD THIS RECORDING DOWN BEFOREHAND. PEOPLE HAVE BROUGHT UP BILL CLINTON. LET ME READ YOU HIS STATEMENT. HE SAID HE’S NOT SPOKEN TO EPSTEIN IN A DECADE AND NEVER BEEN TO HIS RESIDENCE IN FLORIDA OR NEW MEXICO. YOU DID HAVE JOE LOCKHART SAYING THIS ON CNN A LITTLE BIT AGO. TALKING ABOUT THE NUMBER OF LIGHTS BEING LARGER THAN THE CLINTON SAID.>>THE CLINTON MATTER, I STAY IN TOUCH WITH THE FOUNDATION. I KNOW TO CLEAR UP THE TRIPS VERSUS THE FLIGHTS, I THINK THE NUMBER OF 26 OR 27. EACH OF THESE TRIPS AND I’VE BEEN ON MANY OF THEM WHERE YOU GO TO ASIA, AFRICA AND EACH FLIGHT IS COUNTED. EACH TRIP IS SIX OR SEVEN FLIGHTS. I KNOW MOST OF THE CLINTON CIRCLE. EPSTEIN IS NOT PART OF IT.>>Dana: AND YOU SAID IT WAS LIKE CADDIESHACK, WHERE THE GROUNDHOG PEEKS OUT. FROM THERE IN, JEFFERY WAS LIKE A GAME IN WHACK A MOLE. WAS THIS AN OPEN SECRET WHAT WAS HAPPENING IN PALM BEACH OR NEW YORK?>>NO. PEOPLE SAY THEY HAD NO IDEA, I BELIEVE THEM.>>YOU BELIEVE BILL CLINTON DIDN’T KNOW?>>ABSOLUTELY. I KNOW TRUMP DIDN’T KNOW.>>Dana: PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID –>>I’M BRINGING — FRIENDS OF MINE ARE COMING AND THEY LIVE ON THE STREET. THEY DIDN’T KNOW. WHO WOULD KNOW?>>Dana: I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT. HOW DO YOU THINK JEFFERY EPSTEIN MADE HIS MONEY?>>THAT’S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT NOBODY FIGURED OUT. HOW DID HE GET A TEACHING JOB WITH NO COLLEGE DEGREE.>>Dana: THE PRESIDENT SAID HE HAD A FALLING OUT WITH EPSTEIN. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT WAS ABOUT?>>THERE WERE SOME COMPLAINTS ABOUT EPSTEIN AT MAR-A-LARGO. I SPOKE TO THE HEAD OF THE SPA THERE. SHE SAID THAT — I SAID DID YOU MET EPSTEIN? SHE SAID OH, YES. HE WAS INAPPROPRIATE WITH THE WOMEN THERE. SHE SAID SHE WENT TO TRUMP AND HE THREW HIM OUT OF THE CLUB: .>>Dana: KEVIN SPACEY SAID THIS. BECAUSE YOU’VE DONE THIS INVESTIGATIVE WORK, EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY THERE’S A HUNDRED VICTIMS THAT THEY TALKED ABOUT, NONE OF THESE PEOPLE KNEW?>>I DON’T THINK THEY DID. WHY WOULD THEY? DID ANYBODY KNOW ABOUT MATT LAUER? I DOUBT IT.>>Dana: WHAT ABOUT HARVEY WEINSTEIN? PEOPLE DID KNOW ABOUT AUTHOR JAMES PATTERSON THAT WROTE “FILTHY RICH, THE BILLIONAIRE’S SEX SCANDAL.” THIS IS A NONFICTION BOOK. IN THE BREAK YOU SAID THAT YOU THINK THIS WHOLE SCANDAL IS THE WORST OF THE ME TOO MOVEMENT. WHY?>>WHATEVER HAPPENED WITH COSBY IS TERRIBLE STUFF.>>Dana: HARVEY.>>SAME THING. BUT THEY WERE ADULTS. IT’S HORRIFYING. BUT THESE ARE GIRLS. ALLEGEDLY HUNDREDS OF GIRLS. THE PALM BEACH POLICE HAD 20 –>>Dana: SO YOU HAVE THESE IN THE BOOK?>>YEAH. THE “MIAMI HERALD” DID A GREAT JOB. A LOT OF THAT WAS IN THE BOOK. THEY GOT THE GIRLS AS WOMEN. THAT’S INTERESTING IN THE BOOK, WE HAVE THE POLICE INTERVIEWS OF THEM WHEN THEY WERE KIDS AND WHAT HAPPENED. THAT’S DEVASTATING. THE POLICE HAD IT ALL. I MEAN –>>Dana: SO YOU HAVE TO PRESUME THAT ALEX ACOSTA, THAT HE HAD IT, TOO?>>FOR SURE. THAT’S WHY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WAS BLOWN AWAY WHEN THEY HEARD — AND THEY HEARD LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE AFTER IT WAS A DONE DEAL THAT THERE WAS A DEAL. THEY’RE LIKE THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE. YOU CAN’T THROW AWAY THIS EVIDENCE.>>Dana: YOU THINK BECAUSE HE WAS SO RICH AND POWERFUL AND HE HAD THE BEST LAWYERS?>>THE RUMORS WERE, FOR WHAT THEY’RE WORTH, ONE, THAT THE PROSECUTORS WERE FRIGHTENED OF THE TEAM THAT HE PUT TOGETHER WITH DERSHOWITZ AND STARR. THEY DIDN’T WANT ANOTHER O.J. THE SECOND THING WAS, I THINK THE DEFENSE HAD SAID THAT THEY WOULD EVISCERATE THESE GIRLS ON THE STAND. THEY WERE KIDS. THEY WOULD PAINT THEM AS PROSTITUTES. IT WOULD BE A HORROR SHOW.>>Dana: THE OTHER CONTROVERSIAL THING, THE PLEA AGREEMENT IS KEPT FROM THE VICTIMS. THEY DON’T KNOW THIS IS HAPPENING.>>RIGHT.>>Dana: A BIG BONE OF CONTENTION.>>HUGE. AND THAT THEY GIVE IMMUNITY TO EVERY ONE ATTACHED. ALL THE PEOPLE OUT AFTER EPSTEIN.>>Dana: WE TALKED EARLIER IN THE FIRST BLOCK ABOUT THESE FAMOUS PEOPLE THAT KNEW EPSTEIN, MAYBE THEY DIDN’T KNOW ANYTHING. THERE WERE PEOPLE THAT WERE HELPING HIM AND THEY GOT IMMUNITY. HOW IS THAT?>>ANOTHER PART OF THE JUSTICE THAT ASTOUNDS PEOPLE AND IT SHOULD.>>Dana: WHAT IS THE MOOD IN PALM BEACH ABOUT THIS?>>INTERESTING. AFTER THE BOOK CAME OUT IN 2016, HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE SAID THANK YOU FOR WRITING THAT BOOK AS OPPOSED TO WE DON’T REALLY WANT TO HAVE THAT STORY OUT ABOUT THE TOWN. IT WASN’T ABOUT THE TOWN. NOBODY KNEW. YOU CAN’T DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IF ANYBODY KNOWS — I HAVE FRIENDS IN TOWN RIGHT NOW. THEY LIVE ON THE STREET. THEY DIDN’T KNOW. THEY LIVED TWO HOUSES AWAY.>>Dana: THERE’S NOBODY IN THE WORLD OF PUBLISHING THAT CAN END A STORY LIKE THIS. HOW DO YOU THINK THIS WILL END?>>IT’S NOT ACCIDENT THAT WE GOT HIM.>>Dana: HOW DO YOU THINK IT ENDS?>>I WOULD BE SURPRISED IF ACOSTA SURVIVES. I’M NOT SAYING HE DID OR DIDN’T DO HIS JOB. I’D BE SURPRISED IF HE SURVIVES THIS. I WOULD BE SURPRISED IF EPSTEIN DIDN’T SPEND A FAIR AMOUNT OF TIME IN JOB. THE THING IS, WHETHER NEW YORK HAS HIM ON THINGS IN NEW YORK RELATED. I DON’T THINK THEY’LL DO BACK

BREAKING: Jeffrey Epstein’s Accusers SPEAK OUT


FE IWAS TH EOWERG A U FURIINGO KN THATHE TEIFY IT D GO TO IALHR SOLUTELYDO YOUHINK TT. APOPRIEUNISHMENTN ABSOLULY NOT IUESSOBOD OFHE OER TDERS ARETILLJUSTE AN-F STACH AT THERE FOR TOY PROJECT PERPEATOR OUT THERE THAT. OBVIOUSLYELPED HIM IN MANY WAYS FOR AERY LONTIME D TH’RE ILLUT TRE. WITHO. PISHME’ M G ‘S AOPRETPSETNGO SEE W MA LIV HE’ G D YTHI ABOUT IT. WHAT DID HE TELL YOU AND. HOW SURE A YOU ABLS ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IS NOT TELLING ANYBODY WANTED DO WE BELIEVE THAT THE CE AGNST WAS MAXWELL WITH A VE STRG CASE. AND YOU KNOW THE US ATTOEYY COMMITTEDTO PSUIN EXTCT. U HAVE MAN CLIENTS HERE. I’M VICTIM AND THE PROESS THAT YEARS IN CME VICTIMS MOVEMENT I REALLY APPRECIATE EVERYBODY WHO HAS COVERED THIS FM BEGINNING TO END IT’S ONLY BECAUSE OF YOU THAT IT’S AS LIGHT ON THE PROBLEM SO WE DO APPRECIATE THAT. HELLOW. WEVEOUR IENTS DEALT WI POWERFUL T IS THE HOWHEREERE MANY POWEUL M T MAINLY MISTEESTE WHO KEPT OUR IENTSN FEARINKEPT UNRTUNE TT HE NOTERETHERE FACHE CONQUENSF H AND MEHARG SULD B BROUGH MEAHAT’OUR THAT THEIRECON IWHIC THE SES . M. WOD JU WAN TSAY R AL MAKE A OF THE VICTIF THE WH YOU WITNESSED HERE TODAY WAS TRU BRAL R TH TCOMEOGETR AND T ICOURTOGETHER AND GIVE SIGNIFICANT AND THE PUBLIC SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO THIS AND OTHER PERPETRATORS WERE INVOLVED. SHOULD BE STOCKS OF VIRGINIA’S THAT JUST MAKES IT READ CMENT. FIRS OF ALL I FOR TURNIN OUTNDUTTING DE WITH E LA TWOECADTO. HALEY. WANTO STT BY YING. IT’S N HOW JEFFREY DI BUTT’S W HEIVESND- WE NEED TGET THEOTTOM OF ANGOING ALG THLINEAAXWE THER I WASECR . ANNTRAED IN A WORLD THAT I DIDN’T UNDERSTAND AND I’VE BEEN GHTING THAT VERWORL T THIS DAY AO SINCED. AND SOHESE PEOPLE ARBROUGHT TO JUSTICE THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCAPPRECIAD. COMMENTS ON THAT YOU SHOULD BE SILENCED. HAS BEEN OUT OY HE KNOWS WHAT HE’S DONE AND HE CAN ATTEST TO TH SO CAN U REPEAT THAT. ANSWER REAL QUESTIONS THAT THE VICTIMS HAVE ANHAT WE HAVE ONHEIR BEHA WELCO T INTATI IERSONALLY EXNDEDHAT INVITION T PRIN ANDW MM ANYTIME WE ARE READY AND WE THEY’RE JU BLANDTATENTS FOR HIM. AT ARE NOT RESPONDING TO ANYTHING WE HAVEPECIFIC POINTE QUESTIONS AND IF HE REALLY WANTS TO HELP. THEN WE WANT HIS HELP. ANYBODY CAN THE STATE. FOR THINGS TO COME HERENT ANSWER QUESTIONS UND OATH SUBJECT TO CROSS EXAMINAON TH WERE EVENTUALLY GOING TO GET . AS YOU KNOW. WBROUT A LAWST AGNSTWE DAIL EVIDENTIARY S MAELL’PETIONATIENTS IMI THE SUCH TE THAT THAT IS A ROAD THAT. FOUR OF THE POTENTIAL CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. MR UP. YOU SAY TH THE MOR QUESTNS ABOUT THE MANNER IN WHICH HE DIED IN THEY’RE NOT CONVINCED IT WAS A SIGN WELL THAT’S THE FIRST TIME THAT I’VE HEARD THEM SAY THAT I S ANY EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY RTAINLY LOOKS LIKE A SUICI TO ME THE FACHAT HE PROPLER PAIRN O DA BEFORE THE SUICIDE. ALSO IS VE CURUS MAKES I SE LIKEHE THERE THERE WAS TRANSF ASSETSE THAT’S ATT AST AT ILOOKS LE ON ITS THIS F OURWN REANS THEGATING SAME WAYHAT TY SAY THAT THEY’RINU T LI. ON T OTHER QUESTIO THERE ARE MYEOPL THAT KNOW NY THISNDIKE MTER BOIE SAI IT’S Y N MU BUTOBOD HASOME OVE INRMAL THAT EX THA SD INVITATION IS EXTENDED. AND FORMALLY IT WILL ALSO BE EXTENDEDANDUST A JUST IN TUR ABOOW HIEDSTRETCD STRA ATTTIONHAT IS IS ALLYBOUTODAY WHI WAS E EV TT HEID WLE H WAS IVE TT’S S ARINWAS OUT. NOT THE CONSPIRACY TORIES AS TO HOW WAS A IF SHE WAS RE IYS. SHE SURE SHE WOULD SPEAK BUTS YOU CAIMAGE GEN THAT THERE WERE MYANY VICTIMS PBABL HALFF WH YOUEARD FROM THE OTHER HALF YOU DID IT MEA THERE WERE MANY IN COURT TODAY AND SHE’S JUST NOT HEREIGHT HA FURTHER IORMAON AND SHE WILL SREER FEENGS.HE’S A VERY POS PROCES I WISH PEOPLE HAVE LISTEN BACIN TWOHOUSD BEEN PVENT. THIS IA VELD HAVE EMOTIOL DAY. IYOU ULD AMAZIN THA SO NY.HIN WONDFUL AIN AUL PEOPLE CAME R THE WAING OFOMMUTY.F YOSAWHAT SSE S GOG ONHERE. THEREAS A AL SENSE OF COMMUNITY. AMONG THE VICTIMS AND SURVIVORS. BUT RIGHT NOW I THINK THEY NEED A LITTLE PEACE AND QUIET. THANK YOU OFFERING YEAH THANK YOU VERY MUCH

House Judiciary Asks If White House Linked To Jeffrey Epstein Decisions | The Last Word | MSNBC


GOING TO FIND YOURSELVES IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS ONE, IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS ONE, IN AGREEMENT WITH DONALD TRUMP FOR AGREEMENT WITH DONALD TRUMP FOR THIS ONE TIME. THIS ONE TIME. BUT WE BEGIN TONIGHT WITH THE BUT WE BEGIN TONIGHT WITH THE DEATH IN PRISON OF A FORMER DEATH IN PRISON OF A FORMER FRIEND OF DONALD TRUMP’S, A MAN FRIEND OF DONALD TRUMP’S, A MAN WHO DONALD TRUMP CALLED A WHO DONALD TRUMP CALLED A TERRIFIC GUY, WHO WITH DONALD TERRIFIC GUY, WHO WITH DONALD TRUMP’S FULL APPROVAL LIKED TRUMP’S FULL APPROVAL LIKED GIRLS WHO IN DONALD TRUMP’S GIRLS WHO IN DONALD TRUMP’S WORDS WERE “ON THE YOUNGER WORDS WERE “ON THE YOUNGER SIDE.” SIDE.” IT TOOK THE DEATH OF AN ACCUSED IT TOOK THE DEATH OF AN ACCUSED CHILD RAPIST AND SEX TRAFFICKER CHILD RAPIST AND SEX TRAFFICKER AND FRIEND OF PRESIDENTS TRUMP AND FRIEND OF PRESIDENTS TRUMP AND CLINTON TO UNITE THE AND CLINTON TO UNITE THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ON THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ON THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN THE SEARCH FOR INFORMATION FROM SEARCH FOR INFORMATION FROM DONALD TRUMP AND WILLIAM BARR’S DONALD TRUMP AND WILLIAM BARR’S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. CHAIRMAN JERRY NADLER AND THE CHAIRMAN JERRY NADLER AND THE RANKING MEMBER OF THE HOUSE RANKING MEMBER OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE DOUG COLLINS JUDICIARY COMMITTEE DOUG COLLINS CO-SIGNED A LETTER TONIGHT TO CO-SIGNED A LETTER TONIGHT TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WITH 23 THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WITH 23 QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DEATH OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DEATH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. “FROM AN APPARENT SUICIDE ON THE “FROM AN APPARENT SUICIDE ON THE MORNING OF AUGUST 10th, 2019 MORNING OF AUGUST 10th, 2019 WHILE IN YOUR CUSTODY AT THE WHILE IN YOUR CUSTODY AT THE METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER IN NEW YORK.” IN NEW YORK.” THE LETTER IS ADDRESSED TO HUGH THE LETTER IS ADDRESSED TO HUGH HURWITZ, THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF HURWITZ, THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, WHICH IS THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, WHICH IS AN AGENCY IN THE JUSTICE AN AGENCY IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT UNDER ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT UNDER ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR’S CONTROL. GENERAL WILLIAM BARR’S CONTROL. HUGH HURWITTS IS A LIFETIME HUGH HURWITTS IS A LIFETIME GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRAT WHOSE GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRAT WHOSE CAREER BEGAN IN REPUBLICAN CAREER BEGAN IN REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS BUT AS ALSO ADMINISTRATIONS BUT AS ALSO INCLUDED DEMOCRATIC INCLUDED DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATIONS. ADMINISTRATIONS. HE STARTED AS A LOW-LEVEL HE STARTED AS A LOW-LEVEL ASSISTANT IN THE BUREAU OF ASSISTANT IN THE BUREAU OF PRISONS THE YEAR AFTER HE PRISONS THE YEAR AFTER HE GRADUATED FROM COLLEGE. GRADUATED FROM COLLEGE. HE EVENTUALLY BECAME A LAWYER, HE EVENTUALLY BECAME A LAWYER, SPENT SOME TIME IN PRIVATE LAW SPENT SOME TIME IN PRIVATE LAW PRACTICE, RURNLD TO THE BURE O. PRACTICE, RURNLD TO THE BURE O. OF PRISONS IN 1997 IN A OF PRISONS IN 1997 IN A TECHNICAL CAPACITY AS AN TECHNICAL CAPACITY AS AN ASSISTANT CHIEF FOR ASSISTANT CHIEF FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION. DURING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION DURING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION HE WORKED IN A TECHNICAL JOB IN HE WORKED IN A TECHNICAL JOB IN THE FOOD AND DRUG THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, LATER BECAME THE ADMINISTRATION, LATER BECAME THE FDA’S I.T. GUY. FDA’S I.T. GUY. MOVED ON TO ANOTHER TECHNICAL MOVED ON TO ANOTHER TECHNICAL JOB HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH JOB HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH POLICY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DURING THE OBAMA EDUCATION DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HE JOINED NASA ADMINISTRATION HE JOINED NASA AND THE INSPECTOR GENERAL’S AND THE INSPECTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE. OFFICE. AND RETURNED TO THE BUREAU OF AND RETURNED TO THE BUREAU OF PRISONS IN 2015 AS AN ASSISTANT PRISONS IN 2015 AS AN ASSISTANT DIRECTOR. DIRECTOR. MAY 18th OF 2018 ATTORNEY MAY 18th OF 2018 ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS APPOINTED GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS APPOINTED HUGH HURWITZ THE ACTING DIRECTOR HUGH HURWITZ THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS. OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS. AND BECAUSE THIS IS THE TRUMP AND BECAUSE THIS IS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HE IS STILL THE ADMINISTRATION HE IS STILL THE ACTING DIRECTOR. ACTING DIRECTOR. OVER A YEAR LATER. OVER A YEAR LATER. WHEN YOU SEE HUGH HURWITZ WHEN YOU SEE HUGH HURWITZ TESTIFY TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY TESTIFY TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE BOTH UNDER OATH AND COMMITTEE BOTH UNDER OATH AND UNDER PRESSURE AS HE MOST SURELY UNDER PRESSURE AS HE MOST SURELY WILL, YOU WILL BE SEEING THE WILL, YOU WILL BE SEEING THE LASSIC GOVERNMENT TECHNOCRAT. LASSIC GOVERNMENT TECHNOCRAT. YOU WILL NOT BE SEEING ANYONE YOU WILL NOT BE SEEING ANYONE WHO HAS EVER RUN A PRISON OR A WHO HAS EVER RUN A PRISON OR A JAIL HIMSELF. JAIL HIMSELF. HE HAS NEVER HAD ONE DAY OF HE HAS NEVER HAD ONE DAY OF EXPERIENCE WORKING IN A PRISON EXPERIENCE WORKING IN A PRISON OR A JAIL. OR A JAIL. IT IS POSSIBLE HE HAS NEVER MET IT IS POSSIBLE HE HAS NEVER MET AN INMATE. AN INMATE. BUT IT WAS HIS JOB TO KEEP BUT IT WAS HIS JOB TO KEEP JEFFREY EPSTEIN ALIVE. JEFFREY EPSTEIN ALIVE. IT WAS ALSO WILLIAM BARR’S JOB IT WAS ALSO WILLIAM BARR’S JOB TO KEEP JEFFREY EPSTEIN ALIVE. TO KEEP JEFFREY EPSTEIN ALIVE. AND ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR SAID AND ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR SAID TODAY IN EFFECT DON’T BLAME ME. TODAY IN EFFECT DON’T BLAME ME. ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR CLAIMED TO ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR CLAIMED TO BE “APPALLED AND ANGRY.” BE “APPALLED AND ANGRY.” THOSE WERE HIS WORDS. THOSE WERE HIS WORDS. ABOUT THE DEATH OF JEFFREY ABOUT THE DEATH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN. AND HE MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT AND HE MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT HUGH HURWITZ IS IN LINE TO TAKE HUGH HURWITZ IS IN LINE TO TAKE THE FALL FOR THIS ONE. THE FALL FOR THIS ONE.>>WE ARE NOW LEARNING OF>>WE ARE NOW LEARNING OF SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES AT THIS SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES AT THIS FACILITY THAT ARE DEEPLY FACILITY THAT ARE DEEPLY CONCERNING AND DEMAND A THOROUGH CONCERNING AND DEMAND A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION. INVESTIGATION.>>SO WILLIAM BARR IS CLEARLY>>SO WILLIAM BARR IS CLEARLY GOING POINT DOWNWARD AND BLAME GOING POINT DOWNWARD AND BLAME HUGH HURWITZ OR SOMEONE LOWER HUGH HURWITZ OR SOMEONE LOWER DOWN THE CHAIN OF COMMAND AT THE DOWN THE CHAIN OF COMMAND AT THE FEDERAL CORRECTION CENTER IN NEW FEDERAL CORRECTION CENTER IN NEW YORK WHERE JEFFREY EPSTEIN DIED. YORK WHERE JEFFREY EPSTEIN DIED. MAYBE THE BARR INVESTIGATION MAYBE THE BARR INVESTIGATION WILL ULTIMATELY POINT THE FINGER WILL ULTIMATELY POINT THE FINGER AT THE UNIONIZED GUARDS WHO AT THE UNIONIZED GUARDS WHO FAILED TO KEEP JEFFREY EPSTEIN FAILED TO KEEP JEFFREY EPSTEIN ALIVE. ALIVE. OR THE CHIEF PSYCHOLOGIST OF THE OR THE CHIEF PSYCHOLOGIST OF THE CORRECTIONAL CENTER WHO WAS CORRECTIONAL CENTER WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CHARGE OF THE SUPPOSED TO BE IN CHARGE OF THE SUICIDE WATCH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN SUICIDE WATCH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND THE AFTERMATH OF THE SUICIDE AND THE AFTERMATH OF THE SUICIDE WATCH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN. WATCH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN. AFTER JEFFREY EPSTEIN REPORTEDLY AFTER JEFFREY EPSTEIN REPORTEDLY TRIED TO KILL HIMSELF LAST MONTH TRIED TO KILL HIMSELF LAST MONTH HE WAS PLACED ON SUICIDE WATCH HE WAS PLACED ON SUICIDE WATCH FOR SOME PERIOD OF TIME AND THEN FOR SOME PERIOD OF TIME AND THEN REPORTEDLY TAKEN OFF SUICIDE REPORTEDLY TAKEN OFF SUICIDE WATCH. WATCH. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS RULES FOR SUICIDE WATCHES WERE RULES FOR SUICIDE WATCHES WERE WRITTEN IN 2007 WHEN HUGH WRITTEN IN 2007 WHEN HUGH HURWITZ WAS WORKING AT THE HURWITZ WAS WORKING AT THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. IT’S ENTIRELY POSSIBLE HUGH IT’S ENTIRELY POSSIBLE HUGH HURWITZ HAD NO IDEA WHAT THOSE HURWITZ HAD NO IDEA WHAT THOSE RULES WERE UNTIL HE GOT THE RULES WERE UNTIL HE GOT THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE’S LETTER JUDICIARY COMMITTEE’S LETTER TONIGHT. TONIGHT. ONE OF THE RULES SAYS ONCE AN ONE OF THE RULES SAYS ONCE AN INMATE HAS BEEN PLACED ON WATCH INMATE HAS BEEN PLACED ON WATCH “THE WATCH MAY NOT BE TERMINATED “THE WATCH MAY NOT BE TERMINATED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE WITHOUT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE WITHOUT THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR OR THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR OR DESIGNEE PERFORMING A DESIGNEE PERFORMING A FACE-TO-FACE EVALUATION. FACE-TO-FACE EVALUATION. ONLY THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR ONLY THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR WILL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO WILL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REMOVE AN INMATE FROM SUICIDE REMOVE AN INMATE FROM SUICIDE WATCH. WATCH. THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR IS THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR IS USUALLY THE PRISON’S CHIEF USUALLY THE PRISON’S CHIEF PSYCHOLOGIST.” PSYCHOLOGIST.” QUESTION 12 OF THE JUDICIARY QUESTION 12 OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE’S LETTER TO THE BUREAU COMMITTEE’S LETTER TO THE BUREAU OF PRISONSIZE, “DOES MCC NEW OF PRISONSIZE, “DOES MCC NEW YORK HAVE SUCH A PROGRAM YORK HAVE SUCH A PROGRAM COORDINATOR? COORDINATOR? DID HE OR SHE AUTHORIZE THE DID HE OR SHE AUTHORIZE THE REMOVAL OF MR. EPSTEIN FROM REMOVAL OF MR. EPSTEIN FROM SUICIDE WATCH? SUICIDE WATCH? IF NOT WHO DID?” IF NOT WHO DID?” QUESTION 13, DID THE PROGRAM QUESTION 13, DID THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR CONSULT WITH ANYONE COORDINATOR CONSULT WITH ANYONE ELSE IN MAKING THIS ELSE IN MAKING THIS DETERMINATION? DETERMINATION? IF SO, WHO? IF SO, WHO? QUESTION 14. QUESTION 14. “WAS THE TERMINATION OF MR. “WAS THE TERMINATION OF MR. EMSTEIN’S SUICIDE WATCH BY OUGHT EMSTEIN’S SUICIDE WATCH BY OUGHT FISHEL WHO MADE SUCH FISHEL WHO MADE SUCH DETERMINATION DISCUSSED WITH OR DETERMINATION DISCUSSED WITH OR DIRECTED BY ANY SUPERVISORY DIRECTED BY ANY SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL OR LEADERSHIP OF THE PERSONNEL OR LEADERSHIP OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS OR ANY BUREAU OF PRISONS OR ANY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERSONNEL OR EXECUTIVE BRANCH PERSONNEL OR EXECUTIVE BRANCH PERSONNEL OUTSIDE OF THE BUREAU OF OUTSIDE OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS?” PRISONS?” QUESTION 15, “WHO AT THE BUREAU QUESTION 15, “WHO AT THE BUREAU OF PRISONS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF PRISONS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND ELSEWHERE IN THE EXECUTIVE AND ELSEWHERE IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH WAS NOTIFIED OF THE BRANCH WAS NOTIFIED OF THE TERMINATION OF MR. EPSTEIN’S TERMINATION OF MR. EPSTEIN’S SUICIDE WATCH AND WHEN?” SUICIDE WATCH AND WHEN?” THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE IS THE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE IS THE CRAZIEST WHITE HOUSE IN HISTORY. CRAZIEST WHITE HOUSE IN HISTORY. IT IS THE MOST RECKLESS GROUP OF IT IS THE MOST RECKLESS GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE EVER WORKED IN A PEOPLE WHO HAVE EVER WORKED IN A WHITE HOUSE. WHITE HOUSE. AND THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF IS THE AND THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF IS THE MOST RECKLESS OF THEM ALL. MOST RECKLESS OF THEM ALL. THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE’S LETTER THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE’S LETTER SIGNED BY THE TOP DEMOCRAT AND SIGNED BY THE TOP DEMOCRAT AND THE TOP REPUBLICAN ON THE THE TOP REPUBLICAN ON THE COMMITTEE, IS ASKING IF ANYONE COMMITTEE, IS ASKING IF ANYONE IN THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE WAS IN THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE WAS INVOLVED OR AWARE OF THE REMOVAL INVOLVED OR AWARE OF THE REMOVAL STEIN. STEIN. THAT’S WHAT’S IN QUESTION NUMBER THAT’S WHAT’S IN QUESTION NUMBER 14. 14. WAS THE TERMINATION OF MR. WAS THE TERMINATION OF MR. EPSTEIN’S SUICIDE WATCH EPSTEIN’S SUICIDE WATCH DISCUSSED WITH OR DIRECTED BY DISCUSSED WITH OR DIRECTED BY ANY SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL OR ANY SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL OR LEADERSHIP OF THE BUREAU OF LEADERSHIP OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS OR ANY DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS OR ANY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERSONNEL OR EXECUTIVE JUSTICE PERSONNEL OR EXECUTIVE BRANCH PERSONNEL? BRANCH PERSONNEL? WAS WILLIAM BARR INVOLVED? WAS WILLIAM BARR INVOLVED? WAS DONALD TRUMP INVOLVED? WAS DONALD TRUMP INVOLVED? THAT’S WHAT IS IN QUESTION THAT’S WHAT IS IN QUESTION NUMBER 14. NUMBER 14. AND THE HOUSE JUDICIARY AND THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS GOING TO GET COMMITTEE IS GOING TO GET ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS, TO ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS, TO ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS, ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS, INCLUDING PLEASE PROVIDE INCLUDING PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIVIDUAL CORRECTION OFFICERS INDIVIDUAL CORRECTION OFFICERS WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING MR. EPSTEIN ON AUGUST MONITORING MR. EPSTEIN ON AUGUST 9th AND AUGUST 10th SPECIFICALLY 9th AND AUGUST 10th SPECIFICALLY WITH RESPECT TO HOW LONG THEY WITH RESPECT TO HOW LONG THEY HAD BEEN ON THEIR SHIFTS AT THE HAD BEEN ON THEIR SHIFTS AT THE TIME MR. EPSTEIN HAD BEEN FOUND TIME MR. EPSTEIN HAD BEEN FOUND NON-RESPONSIVE IN HIS CELL. NON-RESPONSIVE IN HIS CELL. QUESTION 17, “IF MR. EPSTEIN WAS QUESTION 17, “IF MR. EPSTEIN WAS REMOVED FROM SUICIDE WATCH, WHAT REMOVED FROM SUICIDE WATCH, WHAT PRECAUTIONS WERE PUT IN PLACE TO PRECAUTIONS WERE PUT IN PLACE TO HELP PREVENT THE POSSIBILITY OF HELP PREVENT THE POSSIBILITY OF SELF-INJURY FROM MR. EPSTEIN SELF-INJURY FROM MR. EPSTEIN GIVEN THAT HE WAS TRANSITIONING GIVEN THAT HE WAS TRANSITIONING FROM SUICIDE WATCH? FROM SUICIDE WATCH? WERE THERE ANY STEPS TAKEN TO WERE THERE ANY STEPS TAKEN TO REMOVE POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTS OF REMOVE POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTS OF SELF-INJURY?” SELF-INJURY?” QUESTION 20, “WERE ANY VIDEO QUESTION 20, “WERE ANY VIDEO SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS PLACED IN SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS PLACED IN OR NEAR MR. EPSTEIN’S CELL? OR NEAR MR. EPSTEIN’S CELL? DO RECORDINGS SHOW THE DO RECORDINGS SHOW THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT LED TO MR. CIRCUMSTANCES THAT LED TO MR. EPSTEIN’S DEATH OR THE PRESENCE EPSTEIN’S DEATH OR THE PRESENCE OF ANY OTHER PERSON DURING THIS OF ANY OTHER PERSON DURING THIS TIME PERIOD?” TIME PERIOD?” THE BIPARTISAN LETTER SENT BY THE BIPARTISAN LETTER SENT BY THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS SAYS, “THE BUREAU OF PRISONS SAYS, “THE APPARENT SUICIDE OF THIS APPARENT SUICIDE OF THIS HIGH-PROFILE AND IF ALLEGATIONS HIGH-PROFILE AND IF ALLEGATIONS ARE PROVEN TO BE ACCURATE ARE PROVEN TO BE ACCURATE PARTICULARLY REPREHENSIBLE PARTICULARLY REPREHENSIBLE INDIVIDUAL WHILE IN THE FEDERAL INDIVIDUAL WHILE IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S CUSTODY GOVERNMENT’S CUSTODY DEMONSTRATES SEVERE MISCARRIAGES DEMONSTRATES SEVERE MISCARRIAGES OF AND DEFICIENCIES IN INMATE OF AND DEFICIENCIES IN INMATE PROTOCOL AND HAS ALLOWED THE PROTOCOL AND HAS ALLOWED THE DECEASED TO ULTIMATELY EVADE DECEASED TO ULTIMATELY EVADE FACING JUSTICE. FACING JUSTICE. ANY VICTIMS OF MR. EPSTEIN’S ANY VICTIMS OF MR. EPSTEIN’S ACTIONS WILL FOREVER BE DENIED ACTIONS WILL FOREVER BE DENIED PROPER RECOURSE. PROPER RECOURSE. THE COMPETENCY AND RIGOR OF OUR THE COMPETENCY AND RIGOR OF OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS BEEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS BEEN MARRED BY THIS APPARENT MARRED BY THIS APPARENT OVERSIGHT.” OVERSIGHT.” LEADING OFF OUR DISCUSSION LEADING OFF OUR DISCUSSION TONIGHT MIMI ROCAH, FORMER TONIGHT MIMI ROCAH, FORMER ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY IN THE ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. SHE’S AN MSNBC LEGAL KRIRKT. SHE’S AN MSNBC LEGAL KRIRKT. AND JOHN HEILEMANN, NATIONAL AND JOHN HEILEMANN, NATIONAL AFFAIRS ANALYST FOR MSNBC NEWS AFFAIRS ANALYST FOR MSNBC NEWS AND MSNBC. AND MSNBC. HE IS CO-HOST AND EXECUTIVE HE IS CO-HOST AND EXECUTIVE PRODUCER OF SHOWTIME’S “THE PRODUCER OF SHOWTIME’S “THE CIRCUS.” CIRCUS.” MIMI, YOU KNOW THESE FACILITIES MIMI, YOU KNOW THESE FACILITIES DOWN THERE IN LOWER MANHATTAN. DOWN THERE IN LOWER MANHATTAN. FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY TWEETED FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY TWEETED OVER THE WEEKEND THAT SURELY OVER THE WEEKEND THAT SURELY THERE IS VIDEO THAT WILL TELL US THERE IS VIDEO THAT WILL TELL US SOMETHING IF NOT EVERYTHING SOMETHING IF NOT EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS. ABOUT THIS.>>THERE WILL BE VIDEO THAT WILL>>THERE WILL BE VIDEO THAT WILL BE PART OF THE PUZZLE THAT BE PART OF THE PUZZLE THAT THEY’RE GOING TO HAVE TO PIECE THEY’RE GOING TO HAVE TO PIECE TOGETHER. TOGETHER. THERE WON’T BE VIDEO IN THE SELL THERE WON’T BE VIDEO IN THE SELL BECAUSE OF PRIVACY RIGHTS. BECAUSE OF PRIVACY RIGHTS. BUT THERE WILL BE VIDEO FROM THE BUT THERE WILL BE VIDEO FROM THE HALLWAYS. HALLWAYS. IN WILL BE — THERE WILL BE — IN WILL BE — THERE WILL BE — I’M SURE THEY’RE ALREADY I’M SURE THEY’RE ALREADY LOOKING — SOMEBODY IS GOING LOOKING — SOMEBODY IS GOING THROUGH WHATEVER VIDEO CAN BE THROUGH WHATEVER VIDEO CAN BE GONE THROUGH. GONE THROUGH. THEY’RE LOOK AT WHO DID EPSTEIN THEY’RE LOOK AT WHO DID EPSTEIN SPEAK TO. SPEAK TO. WHO DID HE HAVE PHONE CALLS WHO DID HE HAVE PHONE CALLS WITH? WITH? WHO DID HE HAVE CONTACT WITH IN WHO DID HE HAVE CONTACT WITH IN THE TIME BETWEEN WHEN HE WAS THE TIME BETWEEN WHEN HE WAS TAKEN OFF SUICIDE WATCH AND TAKEN OFF SUICIDE WATCH AND KILLED HIMSELF PRESUMABLY? KILLED HIMSELF PRESUMABLY? YOU KNOW, EVERY PERSONNEL, YOU KNOW, EVERY PERSONNEL, EVERYONE WHO WORKS THERE IS EVERYONE WHO WORKS THERE IS GOING TO BE INTERVIEWED AND GOING TO BE INTERVIEWED AND QUESTIONED SEPARATELY AND QUESTIONED SEPARATELY AND CAREFULLY. CAREFULLY. BUT THE REAL PROBLEM HERE IN MY BUT THE REAL PROBLEM HERE IN MY MIND IS WE NEED ANSWERS AND WE MIND IS WE NEED ANSWERS AND WE NEED BOTH THE PUBLIC AND THE NEED BOTH THE PUBLIC AND THE VICTIMS TO TRUST THE ANSWERS VICTIMS TO TRUST THE ANSWERS THAT WE GET. THAT WE GET. AND WITH BILL BARR AT THE HELM AND WITH BILL BARR AT THE HELM AND DOING WHAT HE’S ALREADY AND DOING WHAT HE’S ALREADY DOING, WHICH IS SPINNING THIS, DOING, WHICH IS SPINNING THIS, LIKE HE DID WITH THE MUELLER LIKE HE DID WITH THE MUELLER REPORT, HOW CAN ANYBODY TRUST REPORT, HOW CAN ANYBODY TRUST IT? IT? HE HAD BEEN RECUSED. HE HAD BEEN RECUSED. HE UNRECUSED HIMSELF TO TAKE HE UNRECUSED HIMSELF TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY OVER THE SOUTHERN RESPONSIBILITY OVER THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT INVESTIGATION. DISTRICT INVESTIGATION. AND NOW HE’S ALREADY DISCLAIMING AND NOW HE’S ALREADY DISCLAIMING RESPONSIBILITY AS YOU SAID. RESPONSIBILITY AS YOU SAID. AND I THINK FOR ANYONE TO HAVE AND I THINK FOR ANYONE TO HAVE FAITH IN WHAT THE FINDINGS ARE, FAITH IN WHAT THE FINDINGS ARE, WHICH ARE SO IMPORTANT TO THE WHICH ARE SO IMPORTANT TO THE VICTIMS AND THE JUSTICE SYSTEM VICTIMS AND THE JUSTICE SYSTEM AS A WHOLE, BILL BARR MUST AS A WHOLE, BILL BARR MUST RECUSE HIMSELF. RECUSE HIMSELF.>>JOHN, THERE IS AN ESTABLISHED>>JOHN, THERE IS AN ESTABLISHED REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL VIEW OF REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL VIEW OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEPARTMENT HEADS IN SITUATIONS LIKE THIS, HEADS IN SITUATIONS LIKE THIS, ESPECIALLY IF IT’S THE HEAD OF ESPECIALLY IF IT’S THE HEAD OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE DEATH OCCURS IN BENGHAZI. DEATH OCCURS IN BENGHAZI. ALL OF THAT WAS BLAMED ON ALL OF THAT WAS BLAMED ON HILLARY CLINTON BY HOUSE HILLARY CLINTON BY HOUSE REPUBLICANS. REPUBLICANS. HERE’S WILLIAM BARR AT THE TOP HERE’S WILLIAM BARR AT THE TOP OF HIS DEPARTMENT. OF HIS DEPARTMENT. BUT THIS LETTER TONIGHT BUT THIS LETTER TONIGHT CO-SIGNED BY THE LEADING CO-SIGNED BY THE LEADING REPUBLICAN ON THE HOUSE REPUBLICAN ON THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS ASKING JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS ASKING ALL THE RIGHT QUESTIONS. ALL THE RIGHT QUESTIONS.>>YES.>>YES. DOES THE WORD HYPOCRISY MEAN DOES THE WORD HYPOCRISY MEAN ANYTHING? ANYTHING? THAT’S NOT A NEW THING FOR THIS THAT’S NOT A NEW THING FOR THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY IN THIS AGE OF REPUBLICAN PARTY IN THIS AGE OF DONALD TRUMP TO CAST ASIDE ALL DONALD TRUMP TO CAST ASIDE ALL PRIOR ALLEGED CONVICTIONS OR PRIOR ALLEGED CONVICTIONS OR COMMITMENTS TO HOW COMMITMENTS TO HOW RESPONSIBILITY WORKS, WHERE THE RESPONSIBILITY WORKS, WHERE THE BUCK STOPS IN SITUATIONS LIKE BUCK STOPS IN SITUATIONS LIKE THIS. THIS. I THINK IT’S, YOU KNOW — YOU’VE I THINK IT’S, YOU KNOW — YOU’VE SEEN THE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AS SEEN THE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AS YOU WATCHED BEFORE THE EPSTEIN YOU WATCHED BEFORE THE EPSTEIN EVENT, YOU KNOW, ON FRIDAY YOU EVENT, YOU KNOW, ON FRIDAY YOU HAD THE NAMES OF SOME PROMINENT HAD THE NAMES OF SOME PROMINENT PEOPLE WHO WERE IMPLICATED IN PEOPLE WHO WERE IMPLICATED IN THE EPSTEIN THING. THE EPSTEIN THING. YOU SAW BILL RICHLDSON’S NAME. YOU SAW BILL RICHLDSON’S NAME. YOU SAW GEORGE MITCHELL’S NAME YOU SAW GEORGE MITCHELL’S NAME COME OUT. COME OUT. YOU SAW DONALD TRUMP’S NAME. YOU SAW DONALD TRUMP’S NAME. AND YOU SAW BILL CLINTON’S NAME. AND YOU SAW BILL CLINTON’S NAME. AND YET OVERT WEEKEND YOU HAVE AND YET OVERT WEEKEND YOU HAVE PEOPLE AROUND DONALD TRUMP PEOPLE AROUND DONALD TRUMP BASICALLY POINTING TO BILL BASICALLY POINTING TO BILL CLINTON AS THE PRESIDENT STOKED CLINTON AS THE PRESIDENT STOKED THIS CONSPIRACY THEORY BY THIS CONSPIRACY THEORY BY RETWEETING SOMEONE WHO CLAIMED RETWEETING SOMEONE WHO CLAIMED THAT THIS IS PART OF THE CLINTON THAT THIS IS PART OF THE CLINTON BODY COUNT. BODY COUNT. YET IT IS THE CASE THAT BOTH OF YET IT IS THE CASE THAT BOTH OF THEM ARE — WERE KNOWN THEM ARE — WERE KNOWN HISTORICAL CONSORTS OF JEFFREY HISTORICAL CONSORTS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS EPSTEIN AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHOSE JUSTICE UNITED STATES WHOSE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT RUNS THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT RUNS THE FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM. PRISON SYSTEM. SO I’M NOT ENDPAJING IN ANY SO I’M NOT ENDPAJING IN ANY CONSPIRACY THEORIES JUST TO SAY CONSPIRACY THEORIES JUST TO SAY IF YOU’RE GOING TO START ASKING IF YOU’RE GOING TO START ASKING ABOUT CULPABILITY AND YOU’RE ABOUT CULPABILITY AND YOU’RE GOING TO START POINT FINGERS THE GOING TO START POINT FINGERS THE PLACE TO START LOOKING IS WITH PLACE TO START LOOKING IS WITH THE GOVERNMENT THAT RUNS THAT THE GOVERNMENT THAT RUNS THAT FACILITY. FACILITY. AND THIS GOES ALL THE WAY UP TO AND THIS GOES ALL THE WAY UP TO THIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, THIS THIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, THIS ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS SHOWN ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS SHOWN OVER AND OVER AGAIN THAT HE’S IN OVER AND OVER AGAIN THAT HE’S IN THIS GAME FIRST AND FOREMOST TO THIS GAME FIRST AND FOREMOST TO PROTECT DONALD TRUMP ABOVE ALL. PROTECT DONALD TRUMP ABOVE ALL.>>MIMI, TO GO BACK TO YOUR>>MIMI, TO GO BACK TO YOUR POINT ABOUT THE BARR POINT ABOUT THE BARR NON-RECUSAL. NON-RECUSAL. BECAUSE THE INVESTIGATIONS IN BECAUSE THE INVESTIGATIONS IN THE SOUTHERN ZRINGT DO CROSS THE SOUTHERN ZRINGT DO CROSS LINES WITH DONALD TRUMP HERE AND LINES WITH DONALD TRUMP HERE AND THERE AND HERE IS SOMEONE WHO IS THERE AND HERE IS SOMEONE WHO IS A FORMER FRIEND OF DONALD TRUMP A FORMER FRIEND OF DONALD TRUMP TRUMP’S. TRUMP’S. IRONICALLY, ODDLY, GIVEN HIS IRONICALLY, ODDLY, GIVEN HIS JOB, HIS FIRST JOB IN NEW YORK JOB, HIS FIRST JOB IN NEW YORK AT A PRIVATE HIGH SCHOOL IN NEW AT A PRIVATE HIGH SCHOOL IN NEW YORK BY WILLIAM BARR’S FATHER, YORK BY WILLIAM BARR’S FATHER, WILLIAM BARR’S FATHER AS THE WILLIAM BARR’S FATHER AS THE HEADMASTER OF SCHOOL ACTUALLY HEADMASTER OF SCHOOL ACTUALLY HIRED THIS GUY, THAT’S PLENTY OF HIRED THIS GUY, THAT’S PLENTY OF GROUNDS RIGHT THERE FOR BARR TO GROUNDS RIGHT THERE FOR BARR TO RECUSE HIMSELF. RECUSE HIMSELF. BUT YOU DIDN’T, AS YOU POINTED BUT YOU DIDN’T, AS YOU POINTED OUT IN THIS CASE. OUT IN THIS CASE. WHICH MEANS HE LEFT HIMSELF IN WHICH MEANS HE LEFT HIMSELF IN CHARGE FULLY OF THE CHARGE FULLY OF THE INCARCERATION OF JEFFREY INCARCERATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN. WHAT EFFORTS DID HE MAKE TO XLNT WHAT EFFORTS DID HE MAKE TO XLNT IMPORTANCE OF THIS PRISONER? IMPORTANCE OF THIS PRISONER?>>EXACTLY.>>EXACTLY. HE’S NOW SAYING IN HIS STATEMENT HE’S NOW SAYING IN HIS STATEMENT TODAY THIS IS SUCH AN IMPORTANT TODAY THIS IS SUCH AN IMPORTANT CASE. CASE. IF IT WERE THAT IMPORTANT OF A IF IT WERE THAT IMPORTANT OF A CASE, A CASE YOU SAID I’M SO CASE, A CASE YOU SAID I’M SO INVESTED IN THIS CASE AND I’M INVESTED IN THIS CASE AND I’M GOING TO PUT ASIDE THOSE MAYBE GOING TO PUT ASIDE THOSE MAYBE APPARENT CONFLICTS THAT PEOPLE APPARENT CONFLICTS THAT PEOPLE MIGHT HAVE ISSUE WITH BECAUSE I MIGHT HAVE ISSUE WITH BECAUSE I WANT TO OVERSEE, IT I WANT TO WANT TO OVERSEE, IT I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT’S DONE RIGHT THIS MAKE SURE IT’S DONE RIGHT THIS TIME AROUND, WELL, THEN YOU TIME AROUND, WELL, THEN YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID FROM THE TOP SHOULD HAVE SAID FROM THE TOP DOWN WHATEVER RESOURCES YOU NEED DOWN WHATEVER RESOURCES YOU NEED TO PROTECT THIS MAN, THE SAME TO PROTECT THIS MAN, THE SAME WAY THEY DID WITH EL CHAPO, WAY THEY DID WITH EL CHAPO, RIGHT? RIGHT? IT’S NOT LIKE THEY AREN’T IT’S NOT LIKE THEY AREN’T CAPABLE OF DOING IT. CAPABLE OF DOING IT. WHATEVER RESOURCES YOU NEED I WHATEVER RESOURCES YOU NEED I WILL GET YOU. WILL GET YOU. I’M NOT SAYING THERE AREN’T I’M NOT SAYING THERE AREN’T SYSTEMATIC PROBLEMS ON A SYSTEMATIC PROBLEMS ON A DAY-TO-DAY BASIS IN THE MCC, DAY-TO-DAY BASIS IN THE MCC, OTHER PRISON THAT’S MAYBE WILL OTHER PRISON THAT’S MAYBE WILL COME TO LIGHT AS A RESULT OF COME TO LIGHT AS A RESULT OF THIS AND BE ADDRESSED BUT HE THIS AND BE ADDRESSED BUT HE COULD HAVE REACHED OUT, HE COULD HAVE REACHED OUT, HE SHOULD HAVE REACHED OUT, SHOULD HAVE REACHED OUT, ESPECIALLY GIVEN HIS POSITION, ESPECIALLY GIVEN HIS POSITION, AND SAID I AM GIVING YOU THE AND SAID I AM GIVING YOU THE RESOURCES YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE RESOURCES YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE JEFFREY EPSTEIN GOES TO TRIAL JEFFREY EPSTEIN GOES TO TRIAL AND SEES THAT DAY OF TRIAL. AND SEES THAT DAY OF TRIAL.>>AND SO JOHN, AS MIMI SAID IN>>AND SO JOHN, AS MIMI SAID IN HER FIRST STATEMENT TONIGHT, HER FIRST STATEMENT TONIGHT, WILLIAM BARR IS ALREADY SPINNING WILLIAM BARR IS ALREADY SPINNING THIS. THIS. HE GOES OUT THERE TODAY AND GOES HE GOES OUT THERE TODAY AND GOES WAY BEYOND ANYTHING WE KNOW IN WAY BEYOND ANYTHING WE KNOW IN THE NEWS REPORTS AND SAYS THE NEWS REPORTS AND SAYS SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES IN THIS SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES IN THIS FACILITY WHICH HE SUPERVISES, FACILITY WHICH HE SUPERVISES, WHICH IS UNDER HIS JURISDICTION. WHICH IS UNDER HIS JURISDICTION. AND THAT AGAIN IS WILLIAM BARR AND THAT AGAIN IS WILLIAM BARR STEPPING OUT AHEAD OF WHAT WE STEPPING OUT AHEAD OF WHAT WE KNOW BEFORE WE’RE ALLOWED TO KNOW BEFORE WE’RE ALLOWED TO KNOW. KNOW. AND THEN NOT GIVING US ANY HINT AND THEN NOT GIVING US ANY HINT OF WHAT AN IRREGULARITY IS. OF WHAT AN IRREGULARITY IS.>>WE’VE SEEN BILL BARR DO THIS>>WE’VE SEEN BILL BARR DO THIS BEFORE, STEP OUT AHEAD OF BEFORE, STEP OUT AHEAD OF EVERYTHING WE KNOW AND CAST EVERYTHING WE KNOW AND CAST EVENTS IN A CERTAIN WAY. EVENTS IN A CERTAIN WAY. SPIN THEM IN A CERTAIN WAY. SPIN THEM IN A CERTAIN WAY. IT’S PART OF THE TROUBLING IT’S PART OF THE TROUBLING PATTERN I THINK ON THE PART FRT PATTERN I THINK ON THE PART FRT ATTORNEY GENERAL. ATTORNEY GENERAL. AND I WILL SAY, YOU KNOW, WE AND I WILL SAY, YOU KNOW, WE DON’T KNOW WHEN HE SAYS THERE DON’T KNOW WHEN HE SAYS THERE ARE TROUBLING IRREGULARITIES, WE ARE TROUBLING IRREGULARITIES, WE DO NOT KNOW IF HE’S TALKING DO NOT KNOW IF HE’S TALKING HIFSHLTH HIFSHLTH HISTORICALLY. HISTORICALLY. WE DON’T KNOW IF HE’S TROEFRG WE DON’T KNOW IF HE’S TROEFRG THIS CASE. THIS CASE. THERE CLEARLY ARE IRREGULARITIES THERE CLEARLY ARE IRREGULARITIES WITH RESPECT TO THIS CASE. WITH RESPECT TO THIS CASE. THE QUESTION IS IF HE’S CASTING THE QUESTION IS IF HE’S CASTING AN ASPERSION THAT HE’S TRYING TO AN ASPERSION THAT HE’S TRYING TO CLAIM THESE PROBLEMS ARE CLAIM THESE PROBLEMS ARE SYSTEMIC AND HAVE GONE ON FOR SYSTEMIC AND HAVE GONE ON FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND SO TALTH YEARS AND YEARS AND SO TALTH HAPPENED ON MY WATCH I CAN’T BE HAPPENED ON MY WATCH I CAN’T BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROBLEMS THAT RESPONSIBLE FOR PROBLEMS THAT HAVE BEEN FESTERING IN THIS HAVE BEEN FESTERING IN THIS PRISON FOR MANY DECADES. PRISON FOR MANY DECADES. WE’LL SEE IF THAT’S WHERE HE GO WE’LL SEE IF THAT’S WHERE HE GO BUT DON’T BE SURPRISEED IF THAT BUT DON’T BE SURPRISEED IF THAT IS WHERE WE GO. IS WHERE WE GO.>>MIMI, “NEW YORK TIMES”>>MIMI, “NEW YORK TIMES” REPORTING THAT THIS MEANS THAT REPORTING THAT THIS MEANS THAT PROSECUTORS WILL PROBABLY START PROSECUTORS WILL PROBABLY START CONCENTRATING MORE HEAVILY ON CONCENTRATING MORE HEAVILY ON THE FINANCIAL LIFE OF JEFFREY THE FINANCIAL LIFE OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN SINCE THEY CAN’T EPSTEIN SINCE THEY CAN’T PROSECUTE ANY OF THESE CRIMINAL PROSECUTE ANY OF THESE CRIMINAL CASES AGAINST HIM. CASES AGAINST HIM. WE HAVE ANOTHER REPORT IN THE WE HAVE ANOTHER REPORT IN THE “NEW YORK TIMES” TONIGHT FROM “NEW YORK TIMES” TONIGHT FROM JAMES STEWART. JAMES STEWART. HE REPORTS OF AN INTERVIEW HE HE REPORTS OF AN INTERVIEW HE HAD WITH EPSTEIN LAST YEAR WHERE HAD WITH EPSTEIN LAST YEAR WHERE EPSTEIN POINTS TO A PICTURE EPSTEIN POINTS TO A PICTURE SAYING THAT’S MBS, REFERRING TO SAYING THAT’S MBS, REFERRING TO MOHAMMAD BIN SALMAN, THE CROWN MOHAMMAD BIN SALMAN, THE CROWN PRINCE OF SAUDI ARABIA. PRINCE OF SAUDI ARABIA. THE CROWN PRINCE HAD VISITED HIM THE CROWN PRINCE HAD VISITED HIM MANY TIMES AND THEY SPOKE OFTEN, MANY TIMES AND THEY SPOKE OFTEN, MR. EPSTEIN SAID. MR. EPSTEIN SAID. MIMI, IF THAT’S TRUE, THAT’S MIMI, IF THAT’S TRUE, THAT’S JUST ONE INDICATOR OF THE KINDS JUST ONE INDICATOR OF THE KINDS OF PEOPLE WHO MAY BE EXPOSED IN OF PEOPLE WHO MAY BE EXPOSED IN THE CONTINUING OF THIS THE CONTINUING OF THIS INVESTIGATION. INVESTIGATION.>>YEAH.>>YEAH. LOOK, THE FACT THAT JOFFREY LOOK, THE FACT THAT JOFFREY BERMAN PUT OUT A STATEMENT ON BERMAN PUT OUT A STATEMENT ON SATURDAY, THAT’S UNUSUAL FOR SATURDAY, THAT’S UNUSUAL FOR THEM TO PUT OUT A STATEMENT AT THEM TO PUT OUT A STATEMENT AT ALL ABOUT A CASE SO QUICKLY OVER ALL ABOUT A CASE SO QUICKLY OVER A WEEKEND, AND THE FACT THAT HE A WEEKEND, AND THE FACT THAT HE MADE THAT POINT ABOUT THERE MADE THAT POINT ABOUT THERE BEING A CONSPIRACY AND WE’RE BEING A CONSPIRACY AND WE’RE GOING TO CONTINUE INVESTIGATING GOING TO CONTINUE INVESTIGATING AND WE WANT VICTIMS TO COME AND WE WANT VICTIMS TO COME FORWARD, I DON’T THINK HE WOULD FORWARD, I DON’T THINK HE WOULD HAVE DONE THAT IF THERE WERE HAVE DONE THAT IF THERE WERE JUST SORT OF LET’S THROW IT UP JUST SORT OF LET’S THROW IT UP AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. THAT WOULD BE PRETTY RISKY ON THAT WOULD BE PRETTY RISKY ON HIS PART. HIS PART. THEY CLEARLY HAVE ALREADY I THEY CLEARLY HAVE ALREADY I THINK SOME IDEA WHERE THIS IS THINK SOME IDEA WHERE THIS IS GOING IN TERMS OF GOING IN TERMS OF CO-CONSPIRATORS. CO-CONSPIRATORS. WHETHER THAT TURNS OUT TO BE WHETHER THAT TURNS OUT TO BE GHISLAINE — I CAN’T PRONOUNCE GHISLAINE — I CAN’T PRONOUNCE HER NAME. HER NAME. MAXWELL MAXWELL MAXWELL MAXWELL MAXWELL. MAXWELL. AND OTHER MORE HIGH-PROFILE AND OTHER MORE HIGH-PROFILE PEOPLE I DON’T KNOW. PEOPLE I DON’T KNOW. BUT THEY ARE GOING TO KEEP BUT THEY ARE GOING TO KEEP PURSUING THIS I THINK CRIMINALLY PURSUING THIS I THINK CRIMINALLY AND CIVILLY IN TERMS OF AND CIVILLY IN TERMS OF FORFEITURE OF HIS ASSETS. FORFEITURE OF HIS ASSETS.>>THE U.S. ATTORNEY SAID TO>>THE U.S. ATTORNEY SAID TO MIMI’S POINT ON SATURDAY O’”TO MIMI’S POINT ON SATURDAY O’”TO THOSE BRAVE YOUNG WOMEN WHO HAVE THOSE BRAVE YOUNG WOMEN WHO HAVE ALREADY COME FORWARD AND TO THE ALREADY COME FORWARD AND TO THE MANY OTHERS WHO HAVE YET TO DO MANY OTHERS WHO HAVE YET TO DO SO, LET ME REITERATE THAT WE SO, LET ME REITERATE THAT WE REMAIN COMMITTED TO STANDING FOR REMAIN COMMITTED TO STANDING FOR YOU IN OUR INVESTIGATION OF THE YOU IN OUR INVESTIGATION OF THE INVESTIGATION OF THE CONDUCT INVESTIGATION OF THE CONDUCT CHARGED IN THE INDICTMENT, WHICH CHARGED IN THE INDICTMENT, WHICH INCLUDED A CONSPIRACY COUNT, INCLUDED A CONSPIRACY COUNT, REMAINS ONGOING.” REMAINS ONGOING.” SO JOHN, THAT’S THE ESSENCE OF SO JOHN, THAT’S THE ESSENCE OF WHAT WE KNOW CONTINUES. WHAT WE KNOW CONTINUES.>>CONSPIRACIES ARE RARELY>>CONSPIRACIES ARE RARELY CONDUCT ADD LOAN. CONDUCT ADD LOAN. CONSPIRACIES USUALLY INVOLVE CONSPIRACIES USUALLY INVOLVE CO-CONSPIRATORS, AND WE HAVE CO-CONSPIRATORS, AND WE HAVE SOME IDEA ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO SOME IDEA ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO WERE CLOSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN. WERE CLOSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN. MISS MAXWELL IS ONE OF THE MISS MAXWELL IS ONE OF THE PEOPLE POINTED TO FREQUENTLY. PEOPLE POINTED TO FREQUENTLY. IT IS THE CASE NOT BEING A IT IS THE CASE NOT BEING A LAWYER BUT HAVING LISTENED TO A LAWYER BUT HAVING LISTENED TO A LOT OF SMART LAWYERS OVER THE LOT OF SMART LAWYERS OVER THE WEEKEND THAT THE ONE POSITIVE WEEKEND THAT THE ONE POSITIVE ELEMENT OF THEN TIRE THING AND ELEMENT OF THEN TIRE THING AND THERE ARE REALLY — IT’S THERE ARE REALLY — IT’S OBVIOUSLY A REALLY DARK FURNISH OBVIOUSLY A REALLY DARK FURNISH OF EVENTS. OF EVENTS. BUT THE NOTION THAT THERE WILL BUT THE NOTION THAT THERE WILL NO LONGER BE STANDING OR THE NO LONGER BE STANDING OR THE ABILITY TO CHALLENGE THE ABILITY TO CHALLENGE THE SEARCHES OF ALL OF GEOFFREY SEARCHES OF ALL OF GEOFFREY EPSTEIN’S PROPERTIES, OF ALL OF EPSTEIN’S PROPERTIES, OF ALL OF HIS BANK RECORDS, THAT HE WON’T HIS BANK RECORDS, THAT HE WON’T HAVE LAWYERS WHO HAVE STABBEDING HAVE LAWYERS WHO HAVE STABBEDING ING ING STANDING TO FIGHT, SO IF THERE STANDING TO FIGHT, SO IF THERE ARE CASES THAT WILL BE BROUGHT ARE CASES THAT WILL BE BROUGHT AGAINST CO-CONSPIRATORS IT AGAINST CO-CONSPIRATORS IT SHOULD BE FOR A COMMITTED SET OF SHOULD BE FOR A COMMITTED SET OF PROSECUTORS EASIER TO GET PROSECUTORS EASIER TO GET EVIDENCE OF THAT CONSPIRACY THAN EVIDENCE OF THAT CONSPIRACY THAN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY IT WOULD HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S LAWYERS WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S LAWYERS FIGHTING AT EVERY TURN. FIGHTING AT EVERY TURN. AND THAT WILL BE ONE OF THE AND THAT WILL BE ONE OF THE TESTS OF WHETHER OR NOT THIS TESTS OF WHETHER OR NOT THIS INVESTIGATION IS SERIOUS OR NOT. INVESTIGATION IS SERIOUS OR NOT. ARE WE NOW GOING TO SEE ARE WE NOW GOING TO SEE PROSECUTORS OR INVESTIGATORS PROSECUTORS OR INVESTIGATORS JUST RANSACKING EVERY L JEFFREY JUST RANSACKING EVERY L JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S LIFE IN ORDER TO TRY EPSTEIN’S LIFE IN ORDER TO TRY TO FIND WHATEVER EVIDENCE EXISTS TO FIND WHATEVER EVIDENCE EXISTS OF ANYONE WHO IS COMPLICIT OF ANYONE WHO IS COMPLICIT WHETHER THEY’RE A CO-CONSPIRATOR WHETHER THEY’RE A CO-CONSPIRATOR OR JUST COMPLICIT IN THIS OR JUST COMPLICIT IN THIS BEHAVIOR BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT BEHAVIOR BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE VICTIMS ARE OWED. THE VICTIMS ARE OWED.>>MIMI, ARE WE GOING TO KNOW>>MIMI, ARE WE GOING TO KNOW HOW JEFFREY EPSTEIN DIED AND WHY HOW JEFFREY EPSTEIN DIED AND WHY HE DIED AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE? HE DIED AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE?>>WELL, LOOK, THE INSPECTOR>>WELL, LOOK, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL’S REPORT I THINK THEY GENERAL’S REPORT I THINK THEY GENERALLY MAKE THEIR FINDINGS GENERALLY MAKE THEIR FINDINGS PUBLIC. PUBLIC. AND HER REASONABLY INDEPENDENT AND HER REASONABLY INDEPENDENT FROM BILL BARR ALTHOUGH PART OF FROM BILL BARR ALTHOUGH PART OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. I THINK WE HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF I THINK WE HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF KNOWING THAT. KNOWING THAT. THE FBI INVESTIGATION — AND BY THE FBI INVESTIGATION — AND BY THE WAY, I’M NOT CASTING THE WAY, I’M NOT CASTING ASPERSIONS ON THE FBI AGENTS ASPERSIONS ON THE FBI AGENTS THEMSELVES. THEMSELVES. THIS IS ABOUT BARR OVERSEEING THIS IS ABOUT BARR OVERSEEING IT. IT. THAT IF IT’S A CRIMINAL THAT IF IT’S A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION WE WOULD ONLY KNOW INVESTIGATION WE WOULD ONLY KNOW ABOUT IF THEY BROUGHT CRIMINAL ABOUT IF THEY BROUGHT CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST SOMEONE. CHARGES AGAINST SOMEONE. AND I THINK IT’S JUST TOO EARLY AND I THINK IT’S JUST TOO EARLY TO SAY THAT. TO SAY THAT. I THINK ALSO THROUGH HOUSE I THINK ALSO THROUGH HOUSE OVERSIGHT WE WILL GET SOME OVERSIGHT WE WILL GET SOME ANSWERS. ANSWERS. SO YES, I THINK WE WILL GET THE SO YES, I THINK WE WILL GET THE ANSWERS. ANSWERS. I THINK IT’S PROBABLY GOING TO I THINK IT’S PROBABLY GOING TO TAKE LONGER THAN PEOPLE WANT, TAKE LONGER THAN PEOPLE WANT, WHICH IS WHY BILL BARR SHOULD WHICH IS WHY BILL BARR SHOULD NOT BE DOING WHAT HE’S DOING NOT BE DOING WHAT HE’S DOING ALREADY, WHICH IS PUTTING OUT A ALREADY, WHICH IS PUTTING OUT A FEW LITTLE SELECT CRYPTIC FACTS FEW LITTLE SELECT CRYPTIC FACTS WITH HIS SPIN ON IT.

Newly-Found Footage Shows Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein At A ’92 Party | Morning Joe | MSNBC


>>>AT LEAST ONE WOMAN HAS COME>>>AT LEAST ONE WOMAN HAS COME FORWARD TO SAY SHE WAS ABUSED BY FORWARD TO SAY SHE WAS ABUSED BY SEX OFFENDER JEFFREY EPSTEIN SEX OFFENDER JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHILE HE WAS ON WORK RELEASE AS WHILE HE WAS ON WORK RELEASE AS PART OF HIS 2007 PLEA DEAL. PART OF HIS 2007 PLEA DEAL. SO THAT SWEETHEART DEAL HAD HIM SO THAT SWEETHEART DEAL HAD HIM OFFENDING AGAIN. OFFENDING AGAIN. A LAWYER REPRESENTING EPSTEIN A LAWYER REPRESENTING EPSTEIN ACCUSERS SAID YESTERDAY THAT THE ACCUSERS SAID YESTERDAY THAT THE WEALTHY FINANCIER WHO WAS WEALTHY FINANCIER WHO WAS ALLOWED TO HAVE VISITORS WHILE ALLOWED TO HAVE VISITORS WHILE HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING DURING THE 13-MONTH SENTENCE DURING THE 13-MONTH SENTENCE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE ARRANGEMENT TO ENGAGE IN ARRANGEMENT TO ENGAGE IN IMPROPER SEXUAL CONTACT BUT IMPROPER SEXUAL CONTACT BUT ADDED THAT THE NEW ACCUSERS MAY ADDED THAT THE NEW ACCUSERS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN MINORS. NOT HAVE BEEN MINORS.>>HE WAS IN HIS OFFICE MOST OF>>HE WAS IN HIS OFFICE MOST OF THE DAY AND WHAT I CAN TELL YOU THE DAY AND WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS HE HAD VISITORS, FEMALE IS HE HAD VISITORS, FEMALE VISITORS. VISITORS. I DON’T KNOW THAT ANY OF THEM I DON’T KNOW THAT ANY OF THEM WERE UNDERAGE, AND THE FEMALE WERE UNDERAGE, AND THE FEMALE VISITORS WERE THERE NOT FOR VISITORS WERE THERE NOT FOR BUSINESS. BUSINESS. WHAT HE DID ON A DAILY BASIS IS WHAT HE DID ON A DAILY BASIS IS ENGAGE IN THESE TYPES OF SEX ENGAGE IN THESE TYPES OF SEX ACTS WITH YOUNG ADULTS AND ACTS WITH YOUNG ADULTS AND CHILDREN. CHILDREN. WHAT HE DID TO MAKE HIS MONEY, I WHAT HE DID TO MAKE HIS MONEY, I DON’T KNOW. DON’T KNOW. WHAT HE DID LEGITIMATELY OUTSIDE WHAT HE DID LEGITIMATELY OUTSIDE OF ENGAGING IN THESE SEXUAL OF ENGAGING IN THESE SEXUAL MISDEEDS, I DON’T KNOW. MISDEEDS, I DON’T KNOW. NOR DO ANY OF THE WITNESSES THAT NOR DO ANY OF THE WITNESSES THAT WE HAVE EVER DEPOSED. WE HAVE EVER DEPOSED.>>SO MANY QUESTIONS HERE.>>SO MANY QUESTIONS HERE. MEANWHILE, EPSTEIN’S LAWYERS MEANWHILE, EPSTEIN’S LAWYERS EXPLAINED THE DOCTORED PASSPORT EXPLAINED THE DOCTORED PASSPORT IN HIS HOME, WHICH SHOWS IN HIS HOME, WHICH SHOWS EPSTEIN’S PHOTO WITH A DIFFERENT EPSTEIN’S PHOTO WITH A DIFFERENT NAME WHILE LISTING HIS RESIDENCE NAME WHILE LISTING HIS RESIDENCE AS SAUDI ARABIA. AS SAUDI ARABIA. ACCORDING TO COURT PAPERS FILED ACCORDING TO COURT PAPERS FILED YESTERDAY, EPSTEIN’S LAWYERS YESTERDAY, EPSTEIN’S LAWYERS SAID THE PASSPORT WAS FOR SAID THE PASSPORT WAS FOR PERSONAL PROTECTION IN THE EVENT PERSONAL PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF TRAVEL TO DANGEROUS AREAS OF TRAVEL TO DANGEROUS AREAS ONLY TO BE PRESENTED TO ONLY TO BE PRESENTED TO POTENTIAL KIDNAPPERS, HIJACKERS POTENTIAL KIDNAPPERS, HIJACKERS OR TERRORISTS SHOULD VIOLENT OR TERRORISTS SHOULD VIOLENT EPISODES OCCURRED, ADDING THAT EPISODES OCCURRED, ADDING THAT EPSTEIN’S JEWISH FAITH AND AMPLE EPSTEIN’S JEWISH FAITH AND AMPLE FINANCES MADE HIM A TARGET IN FINANCES MADE HIM A TARGET IN THE MIDDLE EAST. THE MIDDLE EAST. ATTORNEYS SAY THE TRAVEL ATTORNEYS SAY THE TRAVEL DOCUMENT CAME FROM AUSTRIA AND DOCUMENT CAME FROM AUSTRIA AND EXPIRED MORE THAN 30 YEARS AGO. EXPIRED MORE THAN 30 YEARS AGO. SO WE WANT TO SHOW YOU NOW SOME SO WE WANT TO SHOW YOU NOW SOME FOOTAGE FROM 1992 THAT OUR FOOTAGE FROM 1992 THAT OUR PRODUCERS FOUND IN THE NBC PRODUCERS FOUND IN THE NBC ARCHIVES THAT SHOWS DONALD TRUMP ARCHIVES THAT SHOWS DONALD TRUMP WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS NOW WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS NOW A SEX OFFENDER AND ACCUSED SEX A SEX OFFENDER AND ACCUSED SEX TRAFFICKER, LOOKING AT AND TRAFFICKER, LOOKING AT AND TALKING ABOUT WOMEN AT A PARTY. TALKING ABOUT WOMEN AT A PARTY.>>WELCOME TO THE SOUTHERN WHITE>>WELCOME TO THE SOUTHERN WHITE HOUSE. HOUSE.>>SINCE BECOMING PRESIDENT,>>SINCE BECOMING PRESIDENT, DONALD TRUMP HAS BRANDED DONALD TRUMP HAS BRANDED MAR-A-LAGO, THE SOUTHERN WHITE MAR-A-LAGO, THE SOUTHERN WHITE HOUSE, A PLACE THAT ENTERTAINS HOUSE, A PLACE THAT ENTERTAINS FOREIGN LEADERS, WHERE MILITARY FOREIGN LEADERS, WHERE MILITARY STRIKES ARE ORDERED AND THERE’S STRIKES ARE ORDERED AND THERE’S AN OPEN AIR SITUATION ROOM OVER AN OPEN AIR SITUATION ROOM OVER DESSERT. DESSERT.>>WE HAD THE MOST BEAUTIFUL>>WE HAD THE MOST BEAUTIFUL PIECE OF CHOCOLATE CAKE THAT YOU PIECE OF CHOCOLATE CAKE THAT YOU HAVE EVER SEEN. HAVE EVER SEEN.>>IN THE 90s, MAR-A-LAGO WAS>>IN THE 90s, MAR-A-LAGO WAS DONALD TRUMP’S SOUTH FLORIDA DONALD TRUMP’S SOUTH FLORIDA PARTY PALACE, ONE FREQUENTED BY PARTY PALACE, ONE FREQUENTED BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, WHO IS FACING JEFFREY EPSTEIN, WHO IS FACING CHARGES FOR SEX TRAFFICKING. CHARGES FOR SEX TRAFFICKING. HE HAS PLEADED NOT GUILTY. HE HAS PLEADED NOT GUILTY. THE PRESIDENT SAYS HIS THE PRESIDENT SAYS HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH EPSTEIN WAS NO RELATIONSHIP WITH EPSTEIN WAS NO DIFFERENT THAN ANYONE ELSE IN DIFFERENT THAN ANYONE ELSE IN THEIR ELITE CIRCLE. THEIR ELITE CIRCLE.>>I KNEW HIM LIKE EVERYBODY IN>>I KNEW HIM LIKE EVERYBODY IN PALM BEACH KNEW HIM. PALM BEACH KNEW HIM. HE WAS A FIXTURE IN PALM BEACH. HE WAS A FIXTURE IN PALM BEACH. I DON’T THINK I HAVE SPOKEN TO I DON’T THINK I HAVE SPOKEN TO HIM IN 15 YEARS. HIM IN 15 YEARS.>>YET A TAPE IN THE NBC>>YET A TAPE IN THE NBC ARCHIVES OF A MAR-A-LAGO PARTY ARCHIVES OF A MAR-A-LAGO PARTY SHOWS TRUMP GIVING EPSTEIN HIS SHOWS TRUMP GIVING EPSTEIN HIS PERSONAL ATTENTION. PERSONAL ATTENTION.>>THE FOOTAGE, SHOT IN NOVEMBER>>THE FOOTAGE, SHOT IN NOVEMBER OF 1992 BEFORE TRUMP OPENED THE OF 1992 BEFORE TRUMP OPENED THE RESORT AS A CLUB, SHOWS THE RESORT AS A CLUB, SHOWS THE FUTURE PRESIDENT SURROUNDED BY FUTURE PRESIDENT SURROUNDED BY CHEER LEADERS FOR THE BUFFALO CHEER LEADERS FOR THE BUFFALO BILLS AND MIAMI DOLPHINS, BILLS AND MIAMI DOLPHINS, CAPTURING TRUMP’S FUN LOVING CAPTURING TRUMP’S FUN LOVING BACHELOR LIFESTYLE FOR AN BACHELOR LIFESTYLE FOR AN APPEARANCE ON FAITH DANIELS NBC APPEARANCE ON FAITH DANIELS NBC TALK SHOW. TALK SHOW.>>WE’RE GOING TO GET GREAT>>WE’RE GOING TO GET GREAT RATINGS ON YOUR SHOW. RATINGS ON YOUR SHOW.>>TRUMP IS SURROUNDED BY WOMEN>>TRUMP IS SURROUNDED BY WOMEN AS MUSIC BLARES IN THE AS MUSIC BLARES IN THE BACKGROUND. BACKGROUND. AFTER A WHILE, TRUMP GOES TO AFTER A WHILE, TRUMP GOES TO GREET THREE NEW GUESTS, AMONG GREET THREE NEW GUESTS, AMONG THEM, THE FINANCIER, JEFFREY THEM, THE FINANCIER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN. MORE THAN A DECADE BEFORE HIS MORE THAN A DECADE BEFORE HIS GUILTY PLEA ON STATE GUILTY PLEA ON STATE PROSTITUTION CHARGES. PROSTITUTION CHARGES. LATER IN THE FOOTAGE, TRUMP IS LATER IN THE FOOTAGE, TRUMP IS SEEN TALKING TO EPSTEIN AND SEEN TALKING TO EPSTEIN AND ANOTHER MAN AS WOMEN ARE DANCING ANOTHER MAN AS WOMEN ARE DANCING IN FRONT OF THEM. IN FRONT OF THEM. TRUMP ALTERNATES BETWEEN DANCING TRUMP ALTERNATES BETWEEN DANCING AND POINTING OUT WOMEN TO AND POINTING OUT WOMEN TO EPSTEIN AND THE OTHER MAN, AND EPSTEIN AND THE OTHER MAN, AND TELLING EPSTEIN ABOUT THE TELLING EPSTEIN ABOUT THE CAMERAS. CAMERAS. THOUGH EXACTLY WHAT THEY’RE THOUGH EXACTLY WHAT THEY’RE SAYING IS DIFFICULT TO SAYING IS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND, AS THEY DISCUSS THE UNDERSTAND, AS THEY DISCUSS THE WOMEN AND THEIR APPEARANCES, WOMEN AND THEIR APPEARANCES, TRUMP GESTURES TO ONE AND TRUMP GESTURES TO ONE AND APPEARS TO SAY TO EPSTEIN, LOOK APPEARS TO SAY TO EPSTEIN, LOOK AT HER BACK THERE, SHE’S HOT. AT HER BACK THERE, SHE’S HOT. AND THEN TRUMP SAYS SOMETHING AND THEN TRUMP SAYS SOMETHING ELSE INTO EPSTEIN’S EAR THAT ELSE INTO EPSTEIN’S EAR THAT MAKES HIM DOUBLE OVER WITH MAKES HIM DOUBLE OVER WITH LAUGHTER. LAUGHTER. BUT AS THE PRESIDENT SAYS NOW, BUT AS THE PRESIDENT SAYS NOW, HE NEVER LIKED EPSTEIN. HE NEVER LIKED EPSTEIN.>>I WAS NOT A FAN OF HIS.>>I WAS NOT A FAN OF HIS. THAT I CAN TELL YOU. THAT I CAN TELL YOU. I WAS NOT A FAN OF HIS. I WAS NOT A FAN OF HIS.>>LOOKS LIKE A BIG FAN OF>>LOOKS LIKE A BIG FAN OF EPSTEIN’S. EPSTEIN’S.>>I FEEL LIKE I SAW MAXWELL,>>I FEEL LIKE I SAW MAXWELL, THE REPORTED RECRUITER FOR THE REPORTED RECRUITER FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND I THOUGHT JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND I THOUGHT SHE WAS IN THE BACKGROUND THERE. SHE WAS IN THE BACKGROUND THERE. AGAIN, HERE’S WHAT DONALD TRUMP AGAIN, HERE’S WHAT DONALD TRUMP SAID TO NEW YORK MAGAZINE ABOUT SAID TO NEW YORK MAGAZINE ABOUT EPSTEIN IN 2002. EPSTEIN IN 2002. I’VE KNOWN JEFF FOR 15 YEARS, I’VE KNOWN JEFF FOR 15 YEARS, TERRIFIC GUY. TERRIFIC GUY. HE’S A LOT OF FUN TO BE WITH. HE’S A LOT OF FUN TO BE WITH. IT’S EVEN SAID THAT HE LIKES IT’S EVEN SAID THAT HE LIKES BEAUTIFUL WOMEN AS MUCH AS I DO, BEAUTIFUL WOMEN AS MUCH AS I DO, AND MANY OF THEM ARE ON THE AND MANY OF THEM ARE ON THE YOUNGER SIDE. YOUNGER SIDE. NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, JEFFREY NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, JEFFREY ENJOYS HIS SOCIAL LIFE. ENJOYS HIS SOCIAL LIFE.>>AND WE CERTAINLY SAW THAT>>AND WE CERTAINLY SAW THAT THERE, WILLIE. THERE, WILLIE. SAW IT VERY CLEARLY. SAW IT VERY CLEARLY. HE AND EPSTEIN THERE VERY MUCH HE AND EPSTEIN THERE VERY MUCH ENJOYING THAT PARTY, AND DONALD ENJOYING THAT PARTY, AND DONALD TRUMP SAYING HE NEVER LIKED TRUMP SAYING HE NEVER LIKED JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. ONCE AGAIN, PROVEN TO BE A LIE. ONCE AGAIN, PROVEN TO BE A LIE.>>YEAH, HE SAYS I WAS NOT A FAN>>YEAH, HE SAYS I WAS NOT A FAN OF HIS, THAT I CAN TELL YOU. OF HIS, THAT I CAN TELL YOU. THE PRESIDENT SAYS THAT LAST THE PRESIDENT SAYS THAT LAST WEEK. WEEK. OBVIOUSLY HE WAS A FAN. OBVIOUSLY HE WAS A FAN. WE CAN SEE IT FROM THE QUOTE IN WE CAN SEE IT FROM THE QUOTE IN 2002. 2002. HE SAYS THE RELATIONSHIP BROKE HE SAYS THE RELATIONSHIP BROKE OFF ABOUT 15 YEARS AGO. OFF ABOUT 15 YEARS AGO. THE GOOD NEWS, ELISE JORDAN IS THE GOOD NEWS, ELISE JORDAN IS THAT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF THAT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IS GOING TO PUT ALL OF NEW YORK IS GOING TO PUT ALL OF THIS OUT INTO THE OPEN. THIS OUT INTO THE OPEN. THERE’S GOING TO BE A TRIAL, AND THERE’S GOING TO BE A TRIAL, AND WE’LL GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS. WE’LL GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS. WE DON’T KNOW IF PRESIDENT TRUMP WE DON’T KNOW IF PRESIDENT TRUMP OR THEN BUSINESSMAN, TV HOST, OR THEN BUSINESSMAN, TV HOST, DONALD TRUMP IS IMPLICATED IN DONALD TRUMP IS IMPLICATED IN ANY WAY, BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF ANY WAY, BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF POWERFUL PEOPLE IN NEW YORK AND POWERFUL PEOPLE IN NEW YORK AND ELSEWHERE THAT HAVE REASON TO BE ELSEWHERE THAT HAVE REASON TO BE NERVOUS FOR WHAT’S HAPPENING NERVOUS FOR WHAT’S HAPPENING DOWNTOWN IN THE SOUTHERN DOWNTOWN IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT. DISTRICT.>>THEY SHOULD BE, AND EPSTEIN>>THEY SHOULD BE, AND EPSTEIN SHOULD BE BEHIND, YOU KNOW, IN SHOULD BE BEHIND, YOU KNOW, IN PRISON RIGHT NOW, AND I’M GLAD PRISON RIGHT NOW, AND I’M GLAD THAT THESE VICTIMS ARE FINALLY THAT THESE VICTIMS ARE FINALLY GETTING TO SEE A PREDATOR WHERE GETTING TO SEE A PREDATOR WHERE HE SHOULD BE. HE SHOULD BE. AGAIN, KUDOS TO JULIE BROWN AND AGAIN, KUDOS TO JULIE BROWN AND THE MIAMI HERALD FOR THEIR THE MIAMI HERALD FOR THEIR PERSISTENCE, STICKING WITH THIS PERSISTENCE, STICKING WITH THIS STORY. STORY. I AM STILL JUST A LITTLE BIT AGH I AM STILL JUST A LITTLE BIT AGH BY THAT VIDEO WE JUST SAW OF, BY THAT VIDEO WE JUST SAW OF, YOU KNOW, THE TWO GUYS HAVING YOU KNOW, THE TWO GUYS HAVING THE TIME OF THEIR LIFE AT THE TIME OF THEIR LIFE AT MAR-A-LAGO IN ’92, AND YOU KNOW, MAR-A-LAGO IN ’92, AND YOU KNOW, JUST YESTERDAY THERE WAS AN ITEM JUST YESTERDAY THERE WAS AN ITEM IN NEW YORK MAGAZINE REFERENCING IN NEW YORK MAGAZINE REFERENCING A 2000 PROFILE BY MAXIMUM GOLF A 2000 PROFILE BY MAXIMUM GOLF MAGAZINE AND IT TALKS ABOUT MAGAZINE AND IT TALKS ABOUT EPSTEIN AND TRUMP, HOW EPSTEIN EPSTEIN AND TRUMP, HOW EPSTEIN HITCHED A RIDE WITH JIZLAINE HITCHED A RIDE WITH JIZLAINE MAXWELL, THE FIXER, THE PITCH, MAXWELL, THE FIXER, THE PITCH, THE COPREDATOR ON HIS PRIVATE THE COPREDATOR ON HIS PRIVATE PLANE. PLANE. WE KNOW THERE’S AT LEAST AN WE KNOW THERE’S AT LEAST AN EIGHT YEAR STRETCH WHERE THEY EIGHT YEAR STRETCH WHERE THEY WERE TIGHT ENOUGH WHERE DONALD WERE TIGHT ENOUGH WHERE DONALD TRUMP WAS WELCOMING EPSTEIN ON TRUMP WAS WELCOMING EPSTEIN ON TO HIS PLANE, AND THAT SEEMS TO HIS PLANE, AND THAT SEEMS PRETTY SIGNIFICANT THAT IT PRETTY SIGNIFICANT THAT IT WASN’T JUST A CASUAL FRIENDSHIP, WASN’T JUST A CASUAL FRIENDSHIP, I MEAN, IF I HAD A PLANE, I I MEAN, IF I HAD A PLANE, I WOULDN’T LET ANYONE ON IT. WOULDN’T LET ANYONE ON IT. STEVE PROBABLY DOESN’T. STEVE PROBABLY DOESN’T.>>JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LOOK, I>>JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LOOK, I THINK IT’S CLEAR THAT THEY WERE THINK IT’S CLEAR THAT THEY WERE OBVIOUSLY FRIENDS AND CLOSE AND OBVIOUSLY FRIENDS AND CLOSE AND ALL THAT, AND THEY HAD THIS ALL THAT, AND THEY HAD THIS FALLING OUT IN 2002 AND THERE FALLING OUT IN 2002 AND THERE ARE VARIOUS RUMORS ABOUT WHY ARE VARIOUS RUMORS ABOUT WHY THEY HAD IT. THEY HAD IT. THERE’S A BEFORE AND AFTER PART THERE’S A BEFORE AND AFTER PART TO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM, WHICH WE WILL TWO OF THEM, WHICH WE WILL EVENTUALLY GET CLARIFIED. EVENTUALLY GET CLARIFIED.>>THIS IS ALL SO UTTERLY>>THIS IS ALL SO UTTERLY DEPRESSING, THOOES PRESIDENT OF DEPRESSING, THOOES PRESIDENT OF THE — HE’S PRESIDENT OF THE THE — HE’S PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES.>>UTTERLY DEPRESSING AND ALSO,>>UTTERLY DEPRESSING AND ALSO, WHEN ELISE BROUGHT UP JULIE WHEN ELISE BROUGHT UP JULIE BROWN AND THE FACT THAT SHE AND BROWN AND THE FACT THAT SHE AND THE MIAMI HERALD HAVE REALLY THE MIAMI HERALD HAVE REALLY MADE THIS COME TO LIGHT AGAIN, MADE THIS COME TO LIGHT AGAIN, AND DEMANDED JUSTICE ONCE AGAIN, AND DEMANDED JUSTICE ONCE AGAIN, YOU CANNOT HELP BUT GO BACK TO YOU CANNOT HELP BUT GO BACK TO ALAN DERSHOWITZ AND THE LETTER ALAN DERSHOWITZ AND THE LETTER THAT HE WROTE, ALAN DERSHOWITZ THAT HE WROTE, ALAN DERSHOWITZ WHO’S BEEN ACCUSED OF WRONG WHO’S BEEN ACCUSED OF WRONG DOING, ALAN DERSHOWITZ’S LETTER DOING, ALAN DERSHOWITZ’S LETTER TO THE PULITZER COMMITTEE TO THE PULITZER COMMITTEE ARGUING THAT THE MIAMI HERALD ARGUING THAT THE MIAMI HERALD AND JULIE BROWN SHOULD NOT AND JULIE BROWN SHOULD NOT RECEIVE A PULITZER. RECEIVE A PULITZER. THIS FOR A MAN ALREADY ACCUSED THIS FOR A MAN ALREADY ACCUSED AND FOR A NEWSPAPER AND A AND FOR A NEWSPAPER AND A REPORTER WHO HAS DONE WHAT, MY REPORTER WHO HAS DONE WHAT, MY GOD, NOBODY IN THE FEDERAL GOD, NOBODY IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR ANY STATE GOVERNMENT OR ANY STATE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO AND THAT IS TO BRING THIS MAN TO AND THAT IS TO BRING THIS MAN TO JUSTICE. JUSTICE.>>YEAH, WE SHOULD POINT OUT>>YEAH, WE SHOULD POINT OUT THAT PROFESSOR JESUIT HAS THAT PROFESSOR JESUIT HAS COUNTER SUED ON THAT ACCUSATION, COUNTER SUED ON THAT ACCUSATION, DENIED IT VEHEMENTLY. DENIED IT VEHEMENTLY. THE BOTTOM LINE TO YOUR POINT THE BOTTOM LINE TO YOUR POINT ABOUT THE MIAMI HERALD. ABOUT THE MIAMI HERALD. THE MIAMI HERALD IS A NEWSPAPER, THE MIAMI HERALD IS A NEWSPAPER, ENEMIES OF THE STATE, ENEMIES OF ENEMIES OF THE STATE, ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE AS DONALD TRUMP HAS THE PEOPLE AS DONALD TRUMP HAS REFERRED TO MUCH OF THE MEDIA REFERRED TO MUCH OF THE MEDIA AND WITHOUT THE MIAMI HERALD, AND WITHOUT THE MIAMI HERALD, WITHOUT JULIE K. BROWN WRITING WITHOUT JULIE K. BROWN WRITING DOGGEDLY OVER MANY MANY MONTHS DOGGEDLY OVER MANY MANY MONTHS ABOUT THIS STORY, NONE OF THIS ABOUT THIS STORY, NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN EXPOSED. WOULD HAVE BEEN EXPOSED.>>THAT IS FOR SURE, AND WE WILL>>THAT IS FOR SURE, AND WE WILL STAY ON THIS STORY AS WELL. STAY ON THIS STORY AS WELL.>>>COMING UP, WE HAVE NEW>>>COMING UP, WE HAVE NEW POLLING OUT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TO

New Revelations Revealed In Jeffrey Epstein Will | NBC News Now


THE PERSON WHO HAS TO CONDUCT THE TALKS. THE TALKS. I DON’T KNOW HOW THEY WANT TO I DON’T KNOW HOW THEY WANT TO TALK. TALK.>>>NEW DETAILS TODAY ABOUT>>>NEW DETAILS TODAY ABOUT JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S WILL, WHICH HE JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S WILL, WHICH HE APPARENTLY CHANGED JUST BEFORE APPARENTLY CHANGED JUST BEFORE HIS DEATH AND HIS ESTATE WHICH HIS DEATH AND HIS ESTATE WHICH IS EVEN LARGER THAN WE IS EVEN LARGER THAN WE ORIGINALLY THOUGHT. ORIGINALLY THOUGHT. TOM, WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED ABOUT TOM, WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED ABOUT THE DISGRACED FINANCIER’S THE DISGRACED FINANCIER’S FORTUNE? FORTUNE?>>A COUPLE OF INTERESTING>>A COUPLE OF INTERESTING REVELATIONS. REVELATIONS. AS FAR AS THE OVERALL NET AS FAR AS THE OVERALL NET NUMBER, NOT MUCH OF A DISPUTE NUMBER, NOT MUCH OF A DISPUTE BETWEEN WHAT HE TOLD PROSECUTORS BETWEEN WHAT HE TOLD PROSECUTORS AND A FEDERAL JUDGE BEFORE HE AND A FEDERAL JUDGE BEFORE HE DIED IN AN ATTEMPT TO TRY TO GET DIED IN AN ATTEMPT TO TRY TO GET A BAIL PACKAGE ESSENTIALLY AND A BAIL PACKAGE ESSENTIALLY AND NOT TO BE DETAINED BEHIND BARS NOT TO BE DETAINED BEHIND BARS PRIOR TO HIS TRIAL. PRIOR TO HIS TRIAL. BUT WHAT’S INTERESTING IS A BUT WHAT’S INTERESTING IS A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT THINGS. COUPLE OF DIFFERENT THINGS. I’M HOLDING UP A DOCUMENT HERE. I’M HOLDING UP A DOCUMENT HERE. THIS IS A KEY SECTION. THIS IS A KEY SECTION. THERE’S A TBD. THERE’S A TBD. THE TBD IS FOR THE ART, IT’S FOR THE TBD IS FOR THE ART, IT’S FOR VALUABLES, IT’S FOR ANTIQUES. VALUABLES, IT’S FOR ANTIQUES. IT’S FOR OTHER PERSONAL IT’S FOR OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY. PROPERTY. THAT’S SOMETHING PROSECUTORS THAT’S SOMETHING PROSECUTORS KEYED IN ON BECAUSE THAT SAID KEYED IN ON BECAUSE THAT SAID THAT’S A TYPE OF PORTABLE THAT’S A TYPE OF PORTABLE WEALTH. WEALTH. WHEN YOU TAKE A HIGH VALUED WHEN YOU TAKE A HIGH VALUED PAINTING FOR INSTANCE OR PAINTING FOR INSTANCE OR DIAMONDS OUT OF THE COUNTRY OR DIAMONDS OUT OF THE COUNTRY OR ON SOME SORT OF EFFORT TO FLEE, ON SOME SORT OF EFFORT TO FLEE, THOSE ARE THE TYPE OF THINGS THOSE ARE THE TYPE OF THINGS THAT PROSECUTORS CAN’T REALLY THAT PROSECUTORS CAN’T REALLY HOLD ONTO. HOLD ONTO. IT’S INTERESTING TO SEE HERE IN IT’S INTERESTING TO SEE HERE IN THE WILL KIND OF THE CONCERNS OF THE WILL KIND OF THE CONCERNS OF THE GOVERNMENT LEADING UP TO HIS THE GOVERNMENT LEADING UP TO HIS BAIL DETENTION HEARING. BAIL DETENTION HEARING. OF COURSE THAT HAS BECOME SO OF COURSE THAT HAS BECOME SO IMPORTANT BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE IMPORTANT BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE LAPSES THAT OCCURRED AT MCC LAPSES THAT OCCURRED AT MCC WHERE HE WAS DETAINED BEFORE HE WHERE HE WAS DETAINED BEFORE HE DIED OF SUICIDE. DIED OF SUICIDE.>>HE MADE A LAST-MINUTE CHANGE>>HE MADE A LAST-MINUTE CHANGE TO THAT WILL 48 HOURS BEFORE HE TO THAT WILL 48 HOURS BEFORE HE DIED. DIED. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO THE CIVIL WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO THE CIVIL SUITS AGAINST EPSTEIN AS WE GO SUITS AGAINST EPSTEIN AS WE GO FORWARD? FORWARD?>>ONE OF THE THINGS IT’S DONE>>ONE OF THE THINGS IT’S DONE IS IT’S PUT EVERYTHING INTO A IS IT’S PUT EVERYTHING INTO A TRUST. TRUST. ALL THIS WOULD HAVE GONE TO HIS ALL THIS WOULD HAVE GONE TO HIS BROTHER BUT EVERYTHING IS GOING BROTHER BUT EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE PUT INTO A TRUST HERE. TO BE PUT INTO A TRUST HERE. SO IT MEANS THAT HIS ATTORNEYS SO IT MEANS THAT HIS ATTORNEYS CAN CONTINUE TO BE PAID OUT, BUT CAN CONTINUE TO BE PAID OUT, BUT IT ALSO MEANS THAT THE VICTIMS IT ALSO MEANS THAT THE VICTIMS HERE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE HERE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE CLAIMS AGAINST THE TRUST ITSELF. CLAIMS AGAINST THE TRUST ITSELF. IT SHELTERS A LITTLE BIT. IT SHELTERS A LITTLE BIT. IT KIND OF KEEPS THINGS AWAY IT KIND OF KEEPS THINGS AWAY FROM SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS, FROM SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS, BASICALLY MAKES SURE THAT HIS BASICALLY MAKES SURE THAT HIS FAMILY MEMBERS, IN THIS CASE ONE FAMILY MEMBERS, IN THIS CASE ONE MEMBER, THAT’S HIS BROTHER MARK, MEMBER, THAT’S HIS BROTHER MARK, IS NOT GOING TO BE SUBJECT TO

Barr discusses Jeffrey Epstein case with media


KEVIN’S ROLE –>>Trace: WE HAVE TO CUT YOU OFF. BREAKING NEWS COMING IN. WILLIAM BARR SPEAKING ABOUT THE JEFFERY EPSTEIN CASE. LET’S LISTEN TO THIS.>>A NUMBER OF THEM REQUIRED HAVING UNION REPRESENTATIVES AND LAWYERS BEFORE WE COULD SCHEDULE INTERVIEWS. HOWEVER, WE’RE MOVING EXPEDITIOUSLY. SOON I’LL BE IN A POSITION TO REPORT TO CONGRESS AND THE PUBLIC THE RESULTS. I WILL SAY THAT AS I SAID BEFORE, WE HAVE FOUND SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES AT THE CENTER, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I HAVE SEEN NOTHING THAT HAVE UNDERCUTS THE FINDING OF THE MEDICAL EXAMINER THAT THIS WAS A SUICIDE.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WELL, EPSTEIN’S DEATH, I THINK WE WILL SEE WAS A SUICIDE. I DO THINK THAT THERE ARE SOME IRREGULARITIES AT THE CENTER. BUT I HAVE BROUGHT IN KATHY HAWK SAWYER TO RUN THE BUREAU OF PRISONS. I WORKED CLOSELY WITH HER WHEN I WAS ATTORNEY GENERAL 27 YEARS AGO. I APPOINTED HER AS THE DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU. SHE DID AND OUTSTANDING JOB AT BUREAU. I HAVE EVERY CONFIDENCE SHE’LL ADDRESS ANY MANAGEMENT OR OPERATIONAL DEFICIENCIES AT THE BUREAU. GO AHEAD.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA –>>YES, I HAVE AN IDEA. THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN CONSULTING BROADLY PARTICULARLY WITH MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE LEADERSHIP ON THE HILL. WHEN CONGRESS RETURNS FROM RECESS, I EXPECT THAT THE ADMINISTRATION AS WELL AS