Gutfeld on ‘existential’ being word of the year


MAJOR HOPING FOR A REAL LIFE. I REALIZE I AM IN A GROWN-UP LIFE WITH TAXES, BILLS, AND BRATS. THAT WORD WAS PICKED BECAUSE DUST DWELLING MEDIA TYPES BEAT IT TO DEATH. SPEAK OF THE EXTANT SHOW SCANDAL HAS SURROUNDED THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY. IT’S BECAUSE HE IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO THOSE AMERICAN VALUES.>>DONALD TRUMP IS SUCH AN X ESSENTIAL THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY.>>PRESIDENT TRUMP IS AN X ESSENTIAL THREAT TO THE FUTURE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ITS BECAUSE HE HAS AN X ESSENTIAL THREAT TO THE COUNTRY. BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE IT WAS EXISTENTIAL. THEY NEED TO UNSEAT PRESIDENT TRUMP PAID>>Greg: SOMEONE FACIAL GOOD NEWS, JUST CALL TRUMP AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. IN ABSENCE OF A REAL PHYSICAL THREAT WHICH IS A PSYCHOLOGICAL ONE. JUST LOOK AT ALL OF THE MEASURABLE SEPARATE ECONOMY, JOBS, TARIFFS, YOU SEE NUMBERS TRENDING POSITIVELY. THAT LEAVES THE MEDIA WHICH IS ONE OPTION. PUSH THINGS THAT CAN’T BE MEASURED TO PREDICT GLOOM AND GLOOM. IF MEMBER, NONE OF THESE SMARTY-PANTS ON THE INTERNET HAS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO DICTION EYES OR EVEN BOTHERED UP TO LOOK UP THE WORD IN THE DICTIONARY BUT HERE THEY ARE DESPERATELY COMPETING FOR ATTENTION WHILE THE WHOLE PLANET IGNORES THEM, WHICH IS WHY THE OXFORD DICTIONARIES TO CLIMATE EMERGENCY AS ITS WORD OF THE YEAR. EVEN I THINK IT’S TWO. OXFORD SAID ITS USE TO FILL THE STOMACH REFLECT THE MOOD OR PREOCCUPATIONS OF THE PAST YEAR. TRANSITION, IT’S WHAT RICH ELITES SAY AS THEY BOARD A PLANE FOR A HOLIDAY IN FRANCE. I REMEMBER WHEN DICTIONARIES WERE AWESOME AND THEY CONTAINED WORDS NOT THE POLITICS OF PRETENTIOUS EDITORS. NOW THEY ARE JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER MEDIUM FULL OF ANXIOUS SOCIAL CLIMBERS, STRAINING FOR UNLIKE ME. EXISTENTIAL. IT VERY OVERUSED TERM, EXISTENTIAL CREATED>>EXISTENTIAL.>>EXISTENTIAL.>>Greg: AT LEAST I KNEW WHAT IT MEANT.>>Katie: I WOULDN’T HAVE THOUGHT YOU SAID IT THAT MUCH. I THINK BACK WHEN ISIS WAS BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGI BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLING BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGN BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGE BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGI BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGT BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGN BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGI BEHEADING PEOPLE, I WAS CALLINGL THREAT BUT IT TOLD THEM TO LOOK IT UP BECAUSE I AM NOT A HYPOCRITE. JUAN?>>Juan: CHECK IT OUT.>>Greg:>>Juan: 22, IS THERE A WORD OF THE YEAR THAT YOU WOULD THINK OF?>>Juan: I SAW THERE WAS SOME THOUGHT ABOUT CULTURE BECAUSE I HADN’T HEARD THAT ONE THIS YEAR. I WILL SAY THOUGH THAT ON THE SUBSTANCE OF THIS, I SAW THAT IN THE REPORT ISSUED TODAY, THE DEMOCRATS CALLED TRUMP AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO THE RULE OF LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION CREATED>>Katie: YOU KNOW WHAT WORD SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE WORD OF THE YEAR? TRUMP BECAUSE YOU DECIDED AND EXISTENTIAL IN THE SAME SENTENCE. IF EVERYONE SAYS TRUMP 5 MILLION TIMES A DAY.>>Greg: IT’S LIKE THE WEATHER. IT’S LIKE TRUMP HAS REPLACED THE WEATHER. IT>>Katie: IT’S A NOUN THEM, OR A VERB, EVEN, OR AN AGITATED. IT’S LIKE ALL OF THE THINGS, THAT’S THE WORD THEY SHOULD’VE CHOSEN.>>Greg: NONEGGHEADS LIKE YOU –>>Jesse: YOU KNOW WHAT I HEARD A LOT THIS WEEKEND? DISNEY PLUS. DO YOU HAVE DISNEY BLESS? DID YOU SIGN UP FOR DISNEY PLUS? I HEARD THAT EVERYBODY IS TALKING ABOUT DISNEY PLUS. I’M NOT GETTING PAID BY IT AS A PLUS BUT I’M JUST SAYING, FULL DISCLOSURE, THAT’S WHAT EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT.>>Greg: I THINK I GOT DISNEY PLUS FROM GOOFY. A LOT OF ANTIBIOTICS. JANA, WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THIS? DO YOU HAVE A THEORY?>>Dana: I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THE REASONS THEY DIDN’T WIN AND TRUMP DID WHEN THREAT HE USES VERY PLAIN LANGUAGE THAT EVERYONE CAN UNDERSTAND. HE SAID HILLARY CLINTON WILL DESTROY AMERICA AND HE SAID IT OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND THEY ARE SAYING DONALD TRUMP IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO AMERICA. IF IT DOESN’T HAVE THE SAME PUNCH. YOU HAVE TO KNOW HOW TO USE THE LANGUAGE AND THIS WHOLE THING — THE DICTIONARY EVERY YEAR REMINDS ME OF THE PERSON OF THE YEAR THAT THEY WILL PICK THINGS THAT WILL HELP THEM GET EARNED MEDIA FROM THEIR PEERS SO THAT WE WILL THEN TALK ABOUT IT AND MAKE FUN OF THEM ON “THE FIVE.”>>Greg: EXACTLY AND EVERYBODY WRITES FOR THE OTHER PERSON IN THE INDUSTRY. A>>Dana: TOTALLY BEAR THE THING I WOULD CANCEL HIS IT’S NOT A WORD, IT’S THAT THING ON TWITTER. IT’S I’M NOT CRYING, YOU’RE CRYING? STOP. I CAN’T TAKE THAT.>>Greg: I JUST CAN’T. I JUST CAN’T. YOU KNOW IT’S COMMON? EVERYBODY SAYS 100% INSTEAD OF ABSOLUTELY OR RIGHT. THEY JUST SAY –>>Dana: I JUST SAY HUNDRED. WHAT ABOUT HONDO P? 100%? THAT’S THE YOUNG PEOPLE. WE DO HERE’S THE THING TO IT UNDER THE WORD OF THE AIR, USE IT IN A SENTENCE. Dictionary.com TO CHECK THIS OUT. IT SAYS DOES CLIMATE CHANGE POSE AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO HUMANITY? THEY ARE POLITICIZING EVERYTHING, INCLUDING THE DICTIONARY.>>Greg: I’M TELLING YOU RIGHT NOW, GRETA THORNBURGH IS GOING TO BE A PERSON OF THE ON “TIME” MAGAZINE GRID I’M CALLING IT. SPEECHES ARE NEXT OUTCOME OF THE HOLIDAY EXERCISE BIKE THAT IS SPARKING ACCUSATION OF SEXISM AND MORE. STAY TUNED.

Gutfeld on Congress attacking Zuckerberg


>>DID YOU DISCUSS SO-CALLED SOCIAL MEDIA BIAS AND YOU BELIEVE THERE IS A BIAS?>>CONGRESSWOMAN, I DON’T REMEMBER EVERYTHING THAT WAS ON THE QUESTION.>>THAT’S ALL RIGHT. I’LL MOVE ON.>>CONGRESSWOMAN, SURE. WE ACTUALLY DON’T APPOINT INDEPENDENT FACT-CHECKERS. THEY GO THROUGH AN INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATION CALLED THE INDEPENDENT FACT-CHECKING NETWORK. THAT HAS A RIGOROUS STANDARD FOR WHO THEY ALLOW TO SERVICE FACT-CHECKER.>>Greg: WHAT A CONTRAST. REMEMBER, WHILE ZUCKERBERG CREATED A COMPANY THAT EMPLOYS THOUSANDS, AOC PREVENTED AMAZON FROM EMPLOYING THOUSANDS IN THE CITY SHE REPRESENTS. ZUCKERBERG’S BIG QUESTION IS HOW DO I CONNECT PEOPLE VERSUS HOW DO I LOOK ON TV.>>YOU HAVE RUINED THE LIVES OF MANY PEOPLE, DISCRIMINATED AGAINST THEM. YOU KNOW WHAT PERCENTAGE OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS ARE ON FACEBOOK IN COMPARISON TO THE MAJORITY, FOLKS? DO KNOW WHAT THE PERCENTAGES ARE DO KNOW WHAT THE PERCENTAGES AR ARE?>>PEOPLE USING FACEBOOK.>>YEAH. YOU KNOW WHAT THE PERCENTAGES ARE FOR AFRICAN-AMERICANS QUESTION WORKS BECAUSE I DON’T, BECAUSE WE DON’T COLLECT THAT.>>IT CAME OUT IN A REPORT. MAYBE YOU JUST DON’T READ A LOT OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO DO WITH CIVIL RIGHTS OR AFRICAN-AMERICANS.>>Greg: CELL, WHERE ARE ALL THE FACTS CHECKERS IN THIS? I GUESS BRYANT’S BELTER IS BUSY FACT-CHECKING TRUMP’S TWEET.>>ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ASSOCIATION, MR. ZUCKERBERG?>>Mark: I DON’T KNOW THE ANSWER.>>WHO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE COMMUNITY?>>WOW. ZUCKERBERG DOESN’T KNOW HOW MANY GAY PEOPLE WORK ON AN IDEA. THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM. AFTER THE SHOW, WE ARE GOING TO GET THE WHOLE STAFF TOGETHER AND ASKED THEM IF THEY LIKE MEN, WOMEN, OR BOTH. I THINK THAT’S TOTALLY LEGAL. NO ONE IN THAT ROOM WILL EVER DO IT MORE TO HELP PEOPLE THEN THE GEEKY GUY THEY SLAMMED WITH QUESTIONS. THEY FIND A SACRIFICIAL PINATA AND BEAT THE STUFFING OUT OF IT ON THEIR HOME TURF. THEY MADE HIM INTO A STRAW MAN AND SET FIRE TO HIM. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT ZUCKERBERG’S POLITICS ARE, BUT AFTER THAT HEARING, I KNOW WHAT THEY SHOULD BE. HE SHOULD DESPISE BIG GOVERNMENT AND ITS ENABLERS. HE SHOULD NEVER TAKE THESE CLOWNS SERIOUSLY AGAIN. MAYBE HE SHOULD STOP BEING SO POLITE. THEY WANT TO DESTROY YOU, MARK. NEXT TIME D.C. COMES CALLING, LET IT GO TO VOICE MAIL. SO, DANA, HOW DO YOU GRADE HIS PERFORMANCE? HANDLE AND AT CALMLY. ARROGANCE IS PRETENDING YOU KNOW SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOU ABOUT.>>Greg: IT WENT ON FOR HOURS AND HOURS. HE NEVER LOST HIS COOL. I THINK THAT HE IS SO EXCEEDINGLY CAUTIOUS WITH HIS WORDS, BECAUSE ONE, HE DOESN’T WANT TO OFFEND PEOPLE. IT ALSO RECOGNIZES THAT HE HAS 2 BILLION CUSTOMERS. THERE ARE 2 BILLION PEOPLE ON FACEBOOK. THOSE ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE FAMILY AND FRIENDS, PEOPLE RUNNING BUSINESSES, PEOPLE DOING NEWS, ALL DIFFERENT THINGS. ANYTHING THAT HE SAYS CAN MOVE A MARKET IN THE SECOND. HE TALKED ABOUT LOSING A HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS IN ONE DAY WHEN THEY MOVED TO THE NEWS STAFF. IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. WASHINGTON, THERE ARE SEVERAL FACTORS COMING TOGETHER. ONE OF THEM IS THE ANTITRUST FACTOR. THEY ARE SAYING THAT IS THEY ARE SAYING THAT IT IS A MONOPOLY AND SHOULD BE BROKEN UP. DO THINK WASHINGTON CAN HANDLE THINGS BETTER THAN A PRIVATE COMPANY?>>Greg: OF NOT AFTER SEEING THAT.

‘The Five’ reacts to House GOP storming closed-door impeachment hearing


5:00 IN NEW YORK CITY. THIS IS “THE FIVE”. THIS IS “THE FIVE” THIS IS “THE FIVE.” THE REPUBLICANS ARE FED UP WITH ADAM SCHIFF’S SECRET IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS. NOW THEY’RE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT. FURIOUS REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMEN FOUGHT BACK BY STORMING BACK WITH THE LATEST WITNESS. REPUBLICANS ALSO HAMMERING DEMOCRATS WITH A TOTAL LACK OF TRANSPARENCY.>>BEHIND THOSE DOORS THEY INTEND TO OVERTURN THE RESULTS OF AN AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. WHAT IS ADAM SCHIFF TRYING TO HIDE?>>WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE IS NOT FAIR.>>THERE’S NO REASON THIS SHOULD BE DOWN IN A TINY ROOM WITHIN A REASON IN THE BASEMENT OF THE CAPITOL. THAT’S SO ADAM SCHIFF CAN CONTROL THE NARRATIVE, DRIVE POLLING AND CAN GET THE VOTE THAT HE WANTS, WHICH IS TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT.>>Jesse: ALL THAT ISHAPPENING WHILE THE MEDIA EATS UP THE TALKING POINTS. CHECK OUT THIS. THE PRESS REPEATING THAT THE TESTIMONY WAS DEVASTATING AND CLEAR EVIDENCE OF A QUID PRO QUO.>>UP AHEAD, MORE ON THIS DEVASTATING DAY FOR THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.>>IT’S DEVASTATING TESTIMONY.>>REALLY DEVASTATING PIECE OF EVIDENCE.>>THAT’S WHY THE TESTIMONY WAS SO DEVASTATING.>>IT’S DEVASTATING.>>DEVASTATING FROM A NATIONAL SECURITY PERSPECTIVE.>>HIS TESTIMONY IS DEVASTATING.>>SOUNDS LIKE A QUID PRO QUO DIRECTED BY THE PRESIDENT.>>IS IN FACT A QUID PRO QUO.>>TO PUSH FOR A QUID PRO QUO.>>THERE WAS IN FACT A QUID PRO QUO.>>THE VERY CLEAR QUID PRO QUO.>>THAT IS A QUID PRO QUO.>>Jesse: NOT SO FAST. REPUBLICANS IN THE ROOM SAY THE DIPLOMAT CRUMBLED UNDER QUESTIONING AND THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A QUID PRO QUO. JUAN, DON’T YOU THINK THIS WOULD CLEAR EVERYTHING UP IF THEY DID IT IN OPEN?>>RIGHT. IT WOULD BE A LEGITIMATE PROCESS.>>Jesse: WHY NOT?>>YOU DON’T WANT TO LIBEL SOMEBODY. WHAT IF THEY SAY –>>Jesse: YOU THINK IT WOULD BE ILLEGITIMATE TO HOLD A PUBLIC IN HEAR SOMETHING.>>NO. YOU DIDN’T ASK ME THIS. YOU SAID THIS IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY IS BEING DONE IN PRIVATE TO ALLOW PEOPLE CONFIDENTIALITY, MAKE STATEMENTS AND BROUGHT FORWARD. BY THE WAY, QUID PRO QUO, HOW CAN YOU NOT — DID YOU READ WHAT BILL TAYLOR SAID? A WESTPOINT GRAD THAT SERVED IN VIETNAM, A PUSH APPOINTEE AND AMBASSADOR IN AFGHANISTAN? YOU THINK HE’S A LIAR?>>Jesse: I READ HIS OPENING STATEMENT. WHAT WE DIDN’T HEAR IS HIM UNDER CROSS EXAMINATION. THAT’S WHAT EVERYBODY WANTS TO KNOW. IF YOU’RE GOING TO — THERE’S NO EVIDENCE OF A QUID PRO QUO. GUESS WHAT? WE DON’T — WE CAN’T EVEN PROVE THAT. YOU DON’T EVEN HAVE ANY PEOPLE ASKING QUESTIONS IN PUBLIC.>>HERE’S HIS STATEMENT. YOU CAN READ IT, JESSE. IN THE STATEMENT –>>Jesse: ANYBODY CAN MAKE A STATEMENT AND ANYBODY CAN FAIL TO ANSWER A FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS WHICH HE DID.>>YOU THINK TAYLOR IS A LIAR AND –>>I DON’T KNOW WHAT HE IS. I KNOW I DON’T KNOW AND YOU DON’T EITHER.>>THE PRESS — THE PRESS IS WRONG –>>Jesse: I KNOW THEY’RE CALLING PEOPLE IN SECRET AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE LEAKING TO IT “THE WASHINGTON POST.”>>I CAN READ –>>Jesse: JUAN, YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED FOR DOING THIS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.>>I’M PROUD THAT THE PRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CAN REPORT ON A LEGITIMATE DISTINGUISHED DIPLOMAT –>>Jesse: IT’S ALL LEAKS, JUAN. YOU KNOW IT.>>Greg: THE THING IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE SECRET TESTIMONY IS NOBODY SHOULD BELIEVE IT. IT’S — RIGHT AFTER THE BAT IT STINKS. THE WAY I LOOK AT IT, ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW IS YOU HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF A QUESTION. YOU HAVE HISTORICALLY LOW UNEMPLOYMENT. 6.4 MILLION NEW JOBS A BOOM BEING ECONOMY. SO FAR YOU HAVE PEACE AND IT’S CONTAGIOUS, JUAN. SO WHAT DOES THE ESTABLISHMENT WANT IN A SECRETLY A NONE MUSCLY DRIVEN COUP WHICH IS EGGED ON BY THE MEDIA. TO YOUR POINT, THAT’S THE THING I DON’T UNDERSTAND. THERE’S ONE EXPLANATION FOR THIS. BECAUSE OF THE RESULTS OF TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSE SO FAR, THEY REALIZE THEY CAN’T BEAT HIM, SO THEY NEED TO ELIMINATE HIM. SO WHAT THEY’RE DOING, THEY’RE WILLING TO DIVIDE AND CREATE DIVISION AMONG OUR COUNTRY AS A POLITICAL WEAPON TO SOLVE THEIR POLITICAL HUMILIATION. I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR LIBERTARIANS, FOR LEFTISTS, TRUE LEFTISTS. YOU HAVE A PRESIDENT WHOSE PRIMARY GOAL IS NOT SPILLING ANYMORE BLOOD ANYWHERE. WHERE ARE YOU? THIS IS THE MOST PROGRESSIVE FOREIGN POLICY I’VE SEEN IN MY LIFE. YOU GOING TO LITTLE HILLARY CLINTON OR CNN AND ADAM SCHIFF BASICALLY REPLACE HIM WITH A HILLARY POD BECAUSE THEY DON’T LIKE HIM? AFTER WHAT HE’S DOING? THAT’S PRETTY FRICKING CRAZY.>>Jesse: DANA WHAT DO YOU THINK? “THE WASHINGTON POST” SAYS DEMOCRACY DIES IN THE DARKNESS.>>Dana: THE ARGUING FOR TRANSPARENCY IS USUALLY YOUR BEST ARGUMENT WITH THE MEDIA. WE REVERE THE FIRST AMENDMENT. RIGHT? SO THE TRANSPARENCY THING IS GOOD. THE STUNT TODAY OF — THE PRESIDENT SAID I WANT THE REPUBLICANS TO GET TOUGHER. THEY’LL WIN THE NEWS CYCLE ON THAT TODAY. THEY’LL DRIVE THE NEWS. BUT WHEN THE MAJORITY OF THE HOUSE, DEMOCRATS, HAVE THE GAVEL, THEY’RE NOT AFFECTED BY THE TRANSPARENCY. THEY KEEP ROLLING DOWN. UNTIL THEY SEE SOMETHING IN THEIR POLLING OR IN THEIR FOCUS GROUPS OR THE PRESSURE FROM THEIR CONSTITUENTS GETS TO A FEVER PITCH ON TRANSPARENCY, THEY’RE PROBABLY NOT GOING TO CHANGE IT. THE OTHER THING IS, I THINK — I FEEL LIKE THE GOAL POSTS FROM BOTH SIDES ARE MOVING SO MUCH THAT EVEN IF THERE WAS — THERE WAS A QUID PRO QUO, I’M SURE IT WOULD BE LIKE OH, OKAY. FINE.>>Greg: WHO CARES.>>Dana: AND –>>Greg: THAT’S WHAT PEOPLE DO, DANA, CORRECT?>>Dana: WHAT?>>Greg: LIKE I WANT YOU TO CHECK OUT YOUR CORRUPTION BEFORE WE GIVE YOU ALL OF THIS MONEY. THAT’S WHAT HIS JOB IS.>>BUT GREG, THE QUID PRO QUO HERE IS SOMETHING FOR THE PRESIDENT, SOMETHING OF VALUE, DIRT ON HIS POLITICAL OPPONENT.>>Greg: THE CORRUPTION — NO, NO, NO. YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT CORRUPTION. 2016 CORRUPTION. LOOK INTO IT.>>NO, JOE BIDEN –>>Jesse: JUAN, THERE’S NO QUID PRO QUO BECAUSE THE UKRAINIANS DIDN’T EVEN KNOW THAT ANY OF THE MONEY WAS BEING HELD. I WANT TO PLAY SOME SOUND FROM THE REPUBLICANS ON THIS AND YOU CAN REACT.>>THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REPORTING THAT HE PROVIDED EVIDENCE OF A QUID PRO QUO INVOLVING MILITARY AID IS FALSE. NEITHER HE OR ANY OTHER WITNESS HAS PROVIDED TESTIMONY THAT THE UKRAINIANS WERE AWARE THAT MILITARY AID WAS BEING WITHHELD. YOU CAN’T HAVE A QUARTERBACK WITH NO QOU.>>THE TWO MINUTES, JOHN RADCLIFF DESTROYED THIS WITNESS. THERE’S NO QUID PRO QUO.>>Jesse: DR. SAPPHIRE?>>I FINED IT INTERESTING, WE DIDN’T DO THE TIME LINE. THEY HAVE THE PHONE CONVERSATION. TRUMP AND ZELENSKY IN JULY. THERE’S REPORTS THAT THE WHITE HOUSE IS HOLDING BACK THE FUNDS. THE FUNDS WEREN’T GOING TO BE US YOKED TILL OCTOBER UNTIL ZELENSKY MADE A PUBLIC DECLARATION. WHICH NEVER HAPPENED. THE FUNDS DID GO THERE. I HAVE QUESTIONS WHEN IT COMES TO THE QUID PRO QUO. UNFORTUNATELY THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY MY QUESTIONS ARE NOT BEING ANSWERED. ADAM SCHIFF IS RIGHTING A TIGHT SHIP WITH THE CLOSED DOOR POLICY THAT HE’S ALLOWING THE LEAKS, ALLOWING THIS NARRATIVE TO BUILD UP LIKE INFLATED VERBIAGE AND IT CONTINUES TO DIVIDE THE COUNTRY. THAT IS THEIR NUMBER 1 GOAL, MASSIVE DIVISION NOR 2020 ELECTION. I’M TIRED OF THIS POSTURING JUST FOR ELECTION PURPOSES.>>Jesse: I THINK, JUAN, AFTER A WHILE, IF YOU’RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO DO THIS IN THE DARK IN SECRET SO THE COUNTRY CANNOT WHY THE PRESIDENT IS BEING IMPEACHED, PEOPLE WILL BE FED UP WITH IT. I THINK THIS IS GOING TO DO LONG-TERM DAMAGE HERE.>>YOU DON’T KNOW WHY THE PRESIDENT IS BEING IMPEACHED?>>Jesse: YOU CAN’T HAVE ANY EVEN SEEN BY REPUBLICANS. THEY CAN’T SEE TRANSCRIPTS. NEAR THREATENING TO WITHHOLD CHECKS FROM PEOPLE TESTIFYING.>>YOU DON’T KNOW WHY THE PRESIDENT IS BEING IMPEACHED?>>Jesse: YOU WANT TO SEE THE FULL EVIDENCE. YOU WANT TESTIMONY –>>IT’S A LEGITIMATE CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS THAT THEY WOULD HOLD –>>Jesse: YOU THINK IT’S LEGITIMATE TO DO IT BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?>>ABSOLUTELY.>>Jesse: YOU THINK THIS IS LEGITIMATE?>>I JUST TOLD YOU I DO. THE SECOND THING THAT WILL COME OUT AND YOU’LL SAY OH, MY GOSH. WHY ARE THEY PRESENTING IT THIS WAY? THIS IS UNFAIR TO THE PRESIDENT –>>Jesse: WHEN WILL IT COME OUT?>>IN A MONTH OR SO. IT’S THE SENATE THAT SHOULD BE WORRYING YOU. RIGHT NOW THE DAILY CALL OR SOMEBODY DID A POLL OF ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE SENATE. FORGET THE POLL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT THINK THIS IS LEGITIMATE. THERE WERE ONLY SEVEN SENATORS THAT SAID THEY’RE NOT OPEN TO THE INQUIRY, IMPEACHING –>>Jesse: DO I LOOK>>Jesse: DO I LOOK WO>>Jesse: DO I LOOK WORR>>Jesse: DO I LOOK WORRY>>Jesse: DO I LOOK WORR>>Jesse: DO I LOOK WORRIE>>Jesse: DO I LOOK WORRIED? DANA, WHERE IS THIS GOING?>>Dana: SCHIFF WILL KEEP CALLING THE WITNESSES. EACH SIDE THINKS THEY’RE WINNING. THERE ARE REPUBLICANS THAT THINK YOU IMPEACH DONALD TRUMP — IMPEACHMENT DOES NOT MEAN HE WON’T BE PRESIDENT ANYMORE. CLINTON WAS IMPEACHED AND HIS POLLING NUMBERS WENT UP. HIS POPULARITY WENT UP. PROBABLY HAD A CHANCE TO RUN FOR A THIRD TERM, WHO KNOWS WHO WOULD HAVE HAPPENED. I DON’T KNOW. BUT THERE ARE REPUBLICANS THAT BELIEVE THIS IS HELPING HIM. THEN THERE ARE DEMOCRATS THAT THINK THAT THEY HAVE TO DO THIS HE IN ORDER TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THEIR BASE WHO IS FRUSTRATING BECAUSE THEY SAY HOW ARE YOU HOLDING THE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTABLE? MEANTIME, THERE’S REPORTING TODAY THAT PELOSI’S TEAM AND THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE ARE STILL WORKING ON THEIR PLANS, WHATEVER YOU THINK ABOUT THE LOWERING OF THE DRUG PRICES, THEIR POLICY PROPOSAL, BUT THEY’RE STILL MOVING FORWARD ON THAT AND THE TRADE DEAL, THE USMCA IS STILL ON TRACK AS WELL. MAYBE IT’S POSSIBLE THAT THEY CAN GET THINGS DONE AND CONTINUE WITH IMPEACHMENT.>>Jesse: ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT WALKING AND CHEWING GAME AT THE SAME TIME?>>Dana: A GREAT CLICHE’.