Trump calls out California officials over state’s homeless crisis


SHANNON.>>Shannon: TRACE GALLAGHER LIVE IN A LAKE THANK YOU. PRESIDENT TRUMP HAVING THE BORDER WALL IN CALIFORNIA AND SAYS HE IS GOING TO TAKE ON THE HOMELESSNESS CRISIS. CALIFORNIA LEADERS, YOU HEARD TREY SAY, SUE OVER HIS NOSE POLICY ANNOUNCEMENT, SO LET’S DEBATE WITH A COUPLE OF OUR FAVORITE WEST COASTERS, HOST OF LEFT COAST NEWS, ETHAN BEARMAN, AND HOST OF THE NEXT REVOLUTION RIGHT HERE ON FOX NEWS, D, BOTH TURNING HIS LIFE. GREAT TO HAVE YOU GENTLEMEN.>>HI, SHANNON.>>Shannon: OKAY, SO THERE IS A LOT THERE. LET’S START WITH THE HOMELESSNESS ISSUE. HERE IS WHAT — ABOUT THE FED GETTING INVOLVED AT THE STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS DON’T GET IT UNDER CONTROL.>>IF THESE DEMOCRAT LIBERAL POLITICIANS DON’T STRAIGHTEN IT OUT, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL HAVE TO COME IN. WE ARE NOT GOING TO LOSE CITIES LIKE LOS ANGELES, TIMBER CISCO, AND OTHERS THAT ARE GREAT CITIES, WE ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN TO OUR CITIES.>>Shannon: STATE OFFICIALS THERE DID NOT RECEIVE THAT NEWS VERY WELL.>>WELL, THAT’S BECAUSE WHAT IT DOES IS SHINE A SPOTLIGHT ON THEIR FAILURE, AND IT’S A FAILURE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. IF YOU HAVE BEN CARSON THERE — HE WAS MET BY PROTESTERS. SOME OF THE MOST RIDICULOUS SLOGANS I’VE EVER HEARD. I JUST WANT TO REDO WHAT THEY WERE SAYING. YOU ARE TO BLAME, MAKING PEOPLE HOMELESS IS YOUR GAME. DR. CARSON, IT’S NO LIE, YOU’RE THE REASON WE SLEEP OUTSIDE. THAT IS SO STUPID. IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT’S BEEN GOING ON IN CALIFORNIA FOR YEARS, THE PEOPLE WHO ARE OUTSIDE FOR SLEEPING ON THE STREETS, BOTH SUFFERING AND CAUSING SO MANY PROBLEMS, THE VAST MAJORITY OF THEM EITHER HAVE MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS OR DRUG ADDICTION OR BOTH AND IT’S THE FAILURE OF THE AUTHORITIES IN THIS STATE, STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS, TO ACTUALLY DEAL WITH THAT IN A DIRECT WAY, TO SAY IF YOU’VE GOT MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND ARE SLEEPING ON THE STREET, WE NEED TO PUT YOU INTO TREATMENT. IF YOU’VE GOT DRUG ADDICTION PROBLEMS, WE NEED TO FORCE YOU TO GO INTO REHAB. YOU CAN’T BE OUT THERE SLEEPING ON THE STREET, BUT THEY HAVE REFUSED TO DO THAT AND NOW FINALLY THERE IS SOME ACCOUNTABILITY COMING AND THAT’S WHAT THEY DON’T LIKE, NO WONDER THEY ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT IT.>>Shannon: SOMEONE ELSE COMPLAINING IS A BUSINESS OWNER OUT THERE IN CALIFORNIA WHO SAYS HE IS CONSIDERING CLOSING DOWN BECAUSE OF THE PROBLEM. IT IS WHAT HE TOLD OUR OWN TUCKER CARLSON.>>WE TRIED TO CALL THE POLICE TO HAVE THEM INTERVENE AND ARREST THEM AND IN THE PROCESS HE DECIDED TO BITE ME IN ONE OF THE STATEMENTS HE MADE WAS WHY ARE YOU IN CALLING THE POLICE, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING, THEY’RE JUST GOING TO LET ME GO.>>Shannon: WHAT ABOUT THAT PROBLEM?>>IS HORRIBLE AND I HATE TO SEE THAT HAPPEN AT ALL AND PEOPLE DO GET ATTACKED SOMETIMES AND IT’S TERRIBLE THAT WE DON’T TAKE THE TIME TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN VISIBLE HOMELESS AND THE INVISIBLE HOMELESS. AT WHAT STEVE WAS REFERRING TO, AND WHAT THAT BUSINESS ARE DEALT WITH OR WHAT WE CALL THE VISIBLE HOMELESS, THOSE WHO ARE OUT IN OUR PATHS, THEY ARE BLOCKING SIDEWALKS, THEY HAVE MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES AND WE FINALLY COME AFTER 50 YEARS OF COURT RULINGS THAT HAVE TIED THE HANDS OF CITY AND STATE LEADERS HERE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HAVE STARTED TO FINALLY MAKE SOME PROGRESS WITH NEW CONSERVATORSHIP RULES. WE TRY TO ADDRESS THE HOUSING CRISIS THAT DR. BEN CARSON HAS SO FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG. IT’S ACTUALLY MARKET PROBLEM, OVER 3 MILLION UNITS OF HOUSING SHORT, WHICH THE FEDS COULD HELP WITH AS OPPOSED TO RAISING THE PRICE THAT PEOPLE THAT ARE ON SECTION 8 VOUCHERS HAVE TO CONTRIBUTE, WHICH IS WHAT DR. CARSON HAS PROPOSED. WE NEED TO BE HELPING THESE PEOPLE, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN HELP IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS, BUT YOU DO MEAN TO DEMONIZE, TO COMPLAIN, 50 YEARS OF BAD POLICIES AND MISSPENT MONEY HAD ABSOLUTELY CONTRIBUTED TO THE PROBLEM BUT WE HAVE LEADERS WERE FINALLY TRYING TO ADDRESS IT AND WE COULD USE SOME POSITIVE HELP FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.>>Shannon: STEVE, YOUR RESPONSE?>>SORRY. ETHAN, WE KNOW EACH OTHER, I’D LIKE YOU VERY MUCH, BUT THAT IS COMPLETELY WRONG. THE LEADERS ARE NOT ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM. IF THE PROBLEM IS GETTING WORSE, NOT BETTER. THE NUMBERS ARE GOING UP, NOT DOWN. THEIR HANDS HAVEN’T BEEN TIED IN THIS RESPECT, THEY HAVE BEEN TIED BY THEIR FAILURE TO CONFRONT PROGRESSIVE IDEOLOGY, WHICH SAYS WE ARE NOT GOING TO CONFRONT THESE PROBLEMS –>>THE COURT RULINGS THAT TIE THEM DOWN.>>THAT’S NOT CORRECT. IN NEW YORK, FOR EXAMPLE.>>THAT IS CORRECT, I CAN CITE YOU THE CASES AGAINST THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. THE CITY OF BOISE AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT. THOSE ARE FEDERAL CASES THAT ACTUALLY TELL THE CITIES THEY CAN’T DO CERTAIN THINGS UNTIL THEY ADDRESS THINGS LIKE HOUSIN HOUSING.>>WHY CAN THEY DO IT IN NEW YORK? WHY CAN THEY DO IT IN NEW YORK?>>BECAUSE THEY ARE IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S OF THOSE COURTS ARE IN THIS AREA, THAT’S WHAT THE LAW WORKS.>>Shannon: STEVE, GET UP THAT SENTENCE ABOUT THE 95% SO WE CAN HEAR WHAT YOU’RE SAYING.>>95% OF PEOPLE IN NEW YORK WHO DON’T HAVE HOUSING AND SHELTER ARE IN ACCOMMODATION — THEY ARE NOT SLEEPING ON THE STREETS IN CALIFORNIA IS 25%. THE NUMBERS ARE GETTING WORSE AND THE PROBLEM IS THAT THESE LEADERS IN THE STATE AND LOCAL LEVEL IN CALIFORNIA JUST WON’T STAND UP TO THE LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE IDEOLOGY BUT SAYS WE ARE GOING TO BE SOFT AND HANDS-OFF ABOUT THIS TERRIBLE PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS, NEVER MIND A HUMAN CRISIS AND THE PEOPLE AFFECTED.>>Shannon: WILL AGREE IT IS A

Rep. McCarthy on Democratic debate predictions


FROM PEOPLE WHO WON’T DROP HIM.>>Mike: PETER DOOCY, THANKS VERY MUCH. THIS IS A FOX NEWS ALERT. MIXED MESSAGING TONIGHT FROM HOUSE DEMOCRATS AFTER WHAT EXACTLY THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WILL BE VOTING ON TOMORROW. DEMOCRATIC LEADERS SEEMINGLY BALKING AT CALLING IT AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY AND THAT HAS PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FORMER SPEECH WRITER WEIGHING IN. THAT WILL SIGN OFF ON THIS ABSURD AND POTENTIALLY CONFUSED MESSAGE STRATEGY AND, YOU CAN’T FOOL PEOPLE AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS ARE SAYING TOMORROW IS INDEED A FORMAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE HOUSES IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION.>>THEY ARE PROFITING OFF THE PRESIDENCY AND HAVING THE U.S. MILITARY DO THESE THINGS SO THEY CAN STAY AT A LUXURY RESORT IN SCOTLAND AND THE FOLKS IN BIRMINGHAM HAD THE REAL FACTS. THERE IS NO IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY BUT THEN REVERSED HIS COURSE AN HOUR LATER. LET’S BRING IN REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN FROM CALIFORNIA KEVIN McCARTHY. GREAT TO HAVE YOU. SO CAN YOU FIGURE OUT WHAT’S GOING ON? HERE’S THE PITCH FROM ONE OF YOUR COLLEAGUES IN CALIFORNIA, A DEMOCRAT.>>SO WE KNOW IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED DURING WATERGATE, IT TAKES A WHILE TO GET ALL THE FACTS OUT TO THE PUBLIC. IT ALLOWS US TO HAVE CERTAIN PROCEDURES IN TERMS OF REVIEWING THE GRAND JURY TESTIMONY AND HAVING STAFF DO INTERVIEWS, IT WILL EXPEDITE THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY THAT WE’VE BEEN IN.>>SO WHAT DO YOU SEE FROM ACROSS THE AISLE ON IMPEACHMENT?>>THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE DOING. BUT THE VOTE TOMORROW MEANS, NOTHING. NADLER RAN TO BECOME CHAIRMAN OF THE DAY AFTER THE ELECTION AND THEY TOOK THE MAJORITY. AND YOU KNOW WHAT HIS BIG CAMPAIGN FOR HIS CONFERENCE WAS? THAT HE WOULD BE THE BEST FOR IMPEACHMENT. THEY ARE TRYING TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT WHEN THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO BECAUSE I HAVE ACCOMPLISHED NOTHING. A NEW POLL SHOWS BY DEMOCRATS THAT THEY KNOW MORE ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION THAN ANYTHING THEY PASSED ON THE FLOOR. THEY HAVE ACHIEVED NOTHING. NAME ME ONE PROBLEM THEY HAVE SOLVED? THEY ARE SO ANGRY BECAUSE PRESIDENT TRUMP WON AN ELECTION AND THEY HAVE NEVER GOTTEN OVER IT.>>SO YOU HAVE HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI, TAKE A LISTEN TO SPEAKER PELOSI.>>YES I DO. AND WE ALL WORK TOGETHER.>>ARE THEY TRYING TO HAVE IT BOTH WAYS BY TRYING TO CONVINCE THE BASIS THAT THEY ARE GOING FORWARD?>>IF THEY ARE TO APPEASE THEIR BASE AND CLAIM THEY ARE DOING SOMETHING THEY ARE NOT BECAUSE THEY CAN’T IMPEACH A PRESIDENT THAT IS DOING NOTHING. THEY HAVE RISEN WAGES FOR INDIVIDUALS AND THINK WHAT JUST HAPPENED LAST NIGHT. TWO NEW REPUBLICANS JUST ONE IN NORTH CAROLINA. IN 2018 WOULD BARELY WON THE SEAT BY 900 VOTES. YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED? WE INCREASE THAT 400%.>>SO HOW DOES THAT BASICALLY PREVIEW 2020?>>IT LOOKS LIKE THE REPUBLICANS WILL TAKE THE HOUSE.>>THE DEMOCRATS TAKE CENTER STAGE IN HOUSTON.>>WHAT I SEE IS, IT’S COMING DOWN TO FIVE PEOPLE. JOE BIDEN, ELIZABETH WARREN, BERNIE SANDERS AND MAYOR PETE. I THINK — JOE BIDEN WILL NOT GET THERE, HE’S COLLAPSING. THE PERSON THEY WILL FLOCK TO BEST REPRESENTS THE NEW SOCIAL ECONOMIC PARTY AND THAT WILL BE ELIZABETH WARREN. I THINK PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL HAVE A RESOUNDING REELECTION THAT WILL DRIVE — YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER, THERE ARE 31 DEMOCRATS THAT SIT IN SEATS THAT TRUMP CARRIED.>>CONSIDERING HER POSITIONS, ARE THEY SURPRISED BY THE ENERGY OF ELIZABETH WARREN?>>THEY ALL RAISED THEIR HAND AND THEY CARE MORE ABOUT GIVING HEALTH CARE TO SOMEONE WHO IS HERE ILLEGALLY THAN SOMEONE WHO IS AMERICAN. THEY ARE CONCERNED MORE ABOUT RAISING TAXES AND THEY CARE MORE ABOUT TAKING AWAY YOUR HEALTH CARE AND MAKING GOVERNMENT IN CONTROL OF IT. THIS IS WHAT ELIZABETH WARREN FUNDAMENTALLY BELIEVES. IT’S WHERE THOSE REALLY — SPEAKER PELOSI HAS THE TITLE BUT DOESN’T HAVE THE POWER ANYMORE. AND THEY ARE RUNNING THIS PARTY AND THEY DON’T EVEN CALL THEMSELVES THE DEMOCRATS.>>Mike: THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, SIR. AND DO NOT FORGET TO TUNE IN TOMORROW NIGHT FOR A SPECIAL EXTENDED COVERAGE OF THE THIRD DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY DEBATE.

Was Democrats’ obsession over Trump and Russia worth it for their party?


WE CAN’T WAIT TO READ IT. THANKS SO MUCH.>>THANKS SO MUCH.>>Laura: HAVE DEMOCRATS WASTED THE LAST TWO YEARS GOVERNING OVER FRUITLESS OBSESSIONS WITH THE MUELLER REPORT WINDING DOWN, THE GOVERNMENT STEPPING BACK FROM THEIR CAUSE TO IMPEACH TRUMP. WAS THE DEMOCRATIC OBSESSION OVER TRUMP AND RUSSIA IT REALLY WORTH IT FOR THE PARTY QUEST MAY HERE WITH ANSWER, GLENN GREENWALD, FOUNDER OF THE INTERCEPTS. GLENN GREENWALD DELMA, GREAT TO SEE YOU. YOU’LL NOTICE THAT HARDLY ANY OF THE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS OF CANDIDATES, AND THE LIST IS GROWING SEEMINGLY BY THE DAY, THEY EVEN MENTION TRUMP AND RUSSIA. IT IS REALITY FINALLY SINKING IN FOR THE DEMOCRATS? SOME OF THESE NEW POLES ABOUT MUELLER WHAT THEY ARE THINKING ABOUT.>>YEAH, WE ACTUALLY SAW THIS, LAURA, DURING THE 2018 MIDTERM WHERE THE VICTORIOUS DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES, KNOWING THE LOCAL DISTRICTS REALLY WELL, ALMOST NEVER MENTIONED THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND MSNBC, EXCUSE THE REDUNDANCY, HAVE SPENT THE LAST 2.5 YEARS OBSESSING ON TV AND ESPECIALLY EVERYTHING ELSE, NOT THE CLAIM THAT TRUMP COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA, BUT THAT RUSSIA ACTUALLY CONTROLLED DONALD TRUMP IN SOME SORT OF, YOU KNOW, TOM CLANCY TYPE OF ESPIONAGE WAY. AS A RESULT OF BLACKMAIL OR OTHER KINDS OF LEVERAGE. THAT DISAPPEARED FROM THE WINNING CAMPAIGNS OF 2018 BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT PEOPLE DON’T WAKE UP IN THE MORNING WORRIED ABOUT PUTIN AND THE 2020 COUNTED ITS ARE SEEING THE WHEELS ARE FALLING OFF THE CART OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION AND BARELY MENTIONED IN RECOGNITION OF THAT FACT.>>Laura: GLENN, PELOSI I NOSED OUT OUT THERE TODAY IN MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING A MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING L MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING T MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING L MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING E MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING B MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING T MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING O MISSOURI, SHE WAS BACKTRACKING N THAT BEING BOMBSHELL ADMISSION L THAT BEING BOMBSHELL ADMISSION S THAT BEING BOMBSHELL ADMISSION T WEEK ON PRESIDENT TRUMP AND IMPEACHMENT. LET’S WATCH.>>I SAID, HE’S NOT WORTH IT. IT GOT YOUR ATTENTION. I’VE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR TWO YEARS, HE SHOULDN’T BE IMPEACHED. WHEN I SAY HE’S NOT WORTH IT, THEN IT GOT THE PRESS. WHAT HE’S NOT WORTH IS THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF AMERICA’S WORKING FAMILIES AND THAT’S WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO CORRECT. WHEN THE TIME COMES, WE’LL SEE.>>Laura: DO YOU BELIEVE HER, WHEN THE TIME COMES, WE’LL SEE?>>JUST PLEASE THINK ABOUT HOW STUPID THAT IS, WHAT YOU JUST SAID. THE OVERRIDING THEME OF THE DEMOCRATS FOR A TWO AND A HALF YEARS, GOING BACK TO THE 2016 ELECTION, AS I SAID EARLIER, DONALD TRUMP IS BLACKMAILED BY OR CONTROLLED BY THE KREMLIN AND FORCED TO DO THINGS AGAINST THE INTEREST OF HIS OWN COUNTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND IN FAVOR OF THIS FOR AN ADVERSARY. IF THAT WERE TRUE AT ALL, IF ROBERT MUELLER HAD ANY EVIDENCE OF THAT AND HASN’T SHOWN IT TO US, HE WOULD ALMOST BE GUILTY OF TREASON. IF NANCY PELOSI REALLY BELIEVE THAT DONALD TRUMP IS SERVING THE INTEREST OF RUSSIA AND DECIDES, OH, WE ARE GOING TO TAKE OUR TIME IN REMOVING HIM FROM CONTROL OVER THE NUCLEAR ARSENAL AND THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND THE MILITARY, UNTIL WE FEEL LIKE WE ARE READY TO DO IT? YOU WOULD WONDER, DOES PUTIN HAVE SOMETHING ON PELOSI TOO DELMA IF YOU REALLY HAVE THAT EVIDENCE FOR IT? THEY HAVE NONE AND THEY DON’T HAVE THE INTEGRITY TO ADMIT THAT.>>Laura: GLENN, JUST TWO MONTHS AGO SHE IS ON TWITTER AND SHE’S TWEETING, WHAT DOES PUTIN HAVE ON TRAUMA? THE WHOLE PRESS CORPS AND UNITED STATES FORGETS SHE SAID THAT. JUST TWO MONTHS AGO!>>EXACTLY. DO YOU KNOW WHAT? I KNOW YOU KNOW THAT WE’VE BEEN WORKING AND EXPOSE ABOUT SOME REALLY INCREDIBLE CRIMINAL ACTS ON THE PART OF THE BOLASARIO. HE’S GOING TO BE ON SHANNON BREAM’S SHOWN EXPERT YOU’LL SEE WHAT A REAL SCANDAL LOOKS LIKE. ONLY IN OFFICE FOR TWO MONTHS, CONCRETE TANGIBLE EVIDENCE THAT HAS BEEN PUBLIC WE DISCLOSED LINKING HIM TO THE WORLD’S WORST PARAMILITARY GANGS AND EXTRAJUDICIAL MURDERERS IN THE COUNTRY. THAT’S WHAT A REAL SCANDAL LOOKS LIKE. INSTEAD IN THE U.S., WE HAVE TWO YEARS OF SPECULATION, CONSPIRACY THEORIZING, ALL KINDS OF ESPIONAGE FANTASIES THAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE NOW REALIZING IS NEVER GOING TO COME TO FRUITION. MUELLER HAS NOT INDICTED ONE AMERICAN FOR THE CRIME OF COLLABORATION WITH THE RUSSIANS, PEOPLE DO NOT THINK HE’S GOING TO.>>Laura: GLENN, ALMOST OUT OF TIME. THERE MAY HAVE BEEN PLACES AND AREAS WHERE WE COULD’VE WORKED WITH RUSSIA, EVEN WITH OUR DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT CRIMEA, BUT THERE MAY HAVE BEEN THINGS WE COULD’VE WORKED ON. WITH RUSSIA. THAT WE COULDN’T DO. BECAUSE OF MUELLER HANGING OVER TRUMP. I MEAN, JUST MAY BE.>>THAT’S THE KEY POINT. THE BULLET OF THE SCIENTISTS SAY THAT THE THREAT IS THE POSSIBILITY OF NEW THROUGH WAR NUCLEAR WAR. TRUMP WANTED TO ALSO.

Democratic debate reveals deep divisions over health care, immigration


>>Shannon: WE’LL BE BACK FOR THAT, KRISTIN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LET’S BRING IN FOX NEWS CHIEF POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT. WE SAW MORE OF AN IDEOLOGICAL DIVIDE IT SEEMS LIKE TONIGHT.>>SHANNON, YOU’RE EXACTLY RIGHT. GOOD EVENING. I THINK THAT’S EXACTLY EXACTLY WHAT THE BATTLE WILL BE AS WE HEAD INTO THE CAUCUSES AND PRIMARY BATTLES. THIS IS THE HEART OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, THE FIGHT FOR WHERE THE PARTY GOES. YOU SAW THAT RIGHT AT THE STAGE AT THE BEGINNING ONCE THEY GOT PAST THE ACTUAL OPENING STATEMENTS AND THE NATIONAL ANTHEM, YOU GOT TO HEALTH CARE AND THAT’S WHERE YOU SAW BERNIE SANDERS AND HOW MUCH INFLUENCE HE’S HAD ON THIS PARTY OVER THE LAST TEN YEARS, THE LAST CYCLE.>>TWO THINGS, THEY WILL BE BETTER BECAUSE MEDICARE FOR ALL IS COMPREHENSIVE, COVERS ALL HEALTH CARE NEEDS SENIOR CITIZENS. IT WILL INCLUDE DENTAL CARE, HEARING AIDS, EYEGLASSES.>>YOU DON’T KNOW THAT.>>SECOND OF ALL. I DO KNOW AND I WROTE THE DAMN BILL.>>I WROTE THE DAMN BILL. IT WASN’T LONG BEFORE THE CAMPAIGN HAD BUMPER STICKERS OUT FOR BERNIE SANDERS “I WROTE THE DAMN BILL.” THEY ARE TRYING TO CAPITALIZE ON THAT. THE SECOND ONE WAS THE BATTLE WITH THE MODERATES. THAT IS THE FOILS HERE OF JOHN DELANEY AND THE NEWCOMER TO THE DEBATE STAGE, GOVERNOR BULLOCK FROM MONTANA. THEY FOUGHT BACK ON HEALTH CARE AND ON IMMIGRATION.>>I’VE BEEN GOING AROUND RURAL AMERICA AND I ASK RURAL HOSPITAL AND MINISTERS ONE QUESTION. IF ALL YOUR BILLS WERE PAID AT THE MEDICARE RATE LAST YEAR, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN. THEY’LL LOOK AT ME AND SAY WE WOULD CLOSE. THE QUESTION IS WHY DO WE HAVE TO BE SO EXTREME? WHY CAN’T WE GIVE EVERYONE HEALTH CARE IS A RIGHT AND ALLOW THEM TO HAVE CHOICES. I’M STARTING TO THINK IT’S NOT ABOUT HEALTH CARE. IT’S AN ANTI-PRIVATE SECTOR — THE SAME IMMIGRATION SYSTEM NEEDS A SANE LEADER AND WE CAN DO THAT DECRIMINALIZING, PROVIDING HEALTH CARE FOR EVERYONE. IT’S NOT ME SAYING THAT. IT IS OBAMA’S HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY.>>GOVERNOR BULLOCK HAD A GOOD RUN ON THE DEBATE STAGE AND INTRODUCED HIMSELF. JOHN DELANEY, SEARCHED ON GOOGLE, HE COULD MAKE A JUMP UP. HE NEEDS TO IF HE’S GOING TO GET THE THIRD DEBATE IN SEPTEMBER. FINALLY THE POINT I LOOKED AT WAS ELIZABETH WARREN. SHE HAD THE MOST TALKING TIME OF ANY CANDIDATE ON THE STAGE, AND THEN SHE HAD THIS SLAB BACK OF DELANEY. TAKE A LISTEN.>>I THINK DEMOCRATS WIN WHEN WE RUN ON REAL SOLUTIONS, NOT IMPOSSIBLE PROMISES. WHEN WE RUN ON THINGS THAT ARE WORKABLE, NOT FAIRY TALE ECONOMICS.>>I DON’T KNOW WHY ANYBODY GOES TO THE TROUBLE OF RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JUST TO TALK ABOUT ABOUT WHAT WE CAN’T DO AND SHOULDN’T FIGHT FO FOR. I DON’T GET IT.>>GOT A LOT OF APPLAUSE AND LAUGHS. THE LAST THING IS MARIANNE WILLIAMSON. IN MIAMI, SHE HAD VERY LITTLE TIME ON THE STAGE, TALKING TIME. YET WE SAW HER NUMBERS BUMP UP IN NEW HAMPSHIRE IN PARTICULAR. TONIGHT SHE HAD A LOT MORE TIME, MARIANNE WILLIAMSON DID, SHE’S NOW THE NUMBER ONE SEARCHED CANDIDATE FROM THIS DEBATE ON GOOGLE. SHE IS TRENDING ON TWITTER. I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED TO SEE MARIANNE WILLIAMSON, THE AUTHOR, WHO TALKS ABOUT LOVE AND FIGHTING THE DARK FORCES, GET A BUMP TONIGHT IN THE POLLS PERHAPS ENOUGH TO GET HER TO THE THIRD DEBATE.>>Shannon: YEAH, I THINK YOU’RE RIGHT. IT WOULDN’T BE SPREES EITHER. SHE GARNERED IT SEEMED SOME OF THE MOST REACTION TONIGHT. THAT CAME OFF AND WHEN SHE WAS CALLING ANYBODY ELSE OUT. SHE IS ONE OF THE NONPOLITICIANS, THE ONLY ONE IN THE WHOLE THING RIGHT NOW. SHE HAS BEEN CALLING THEM OUT FOR THE MONEY THEY’VE TAKEN, THE HYPOCRISY ABOUT THESE THINGS. I HAVE TO TELL YOU THE AUDIENCE HERE IN DETROIT REALLY SEEMED TO LOVE HER TONIGHT.>>THEY REALLY DID VERY LAST THING, SHANNON. I THINK THESE CANDIDATES ALL GOT THE FACT THAT DEMOCRATS REALLY CARE ABOUT MOST BEATING DONALD TRUMP. EVERYONE OF THE OPENING AND CLOSING STATEMENTS HAD TO DO WITH BEATING DONALD TRUMP. ALL OF THEM SAID THEY COULD DO

Blunt: Democrats managed to energize the Republican base


NEW SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, BRETT KAVANAUGH IS PREPARING FOR HIS FIRST WEEK ON THE JOB. HOUSE DEMOCRATS SAY THEY ARE NOT FINISHED YET. DONALD TRUMP JR. WARNING IN A TWEET, QUOTE – TRUMP SUPPORTERS, YOU BETTER BELIEVE THE DEMOCRATS WILL DO EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO IMPEACH KAVANAUGH FROM SUPREME COURT IF THEY TAKE CONTROL OF CONGRESS IN NOVEMBER. YESTERDAY, THE TOP DEMOCRAT ON THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE VOWED TO INVESTIGATE KAVANAUGH IF DEMOCRATS WIN CONTROL OF THE HOUSE. COUNCILMAN JERRY AND — TELLING YOUR TIME THIS. QUOTE WILL NEED TO DO SOMETHING TO PROVIDE CHECK AND BALANCE TO PROTECT THE RULE OF LAW AND TO PROTECT THE LEGITIMACY ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT INSTITUTIONS. IN A SPLIT INTERVIEW RIGHT NOW, ROY BLUNT, VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE REPUBLICAN OF CONFERENCE . GOOD TO SEE THIS MORNING THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.>>GOOD TO BE WITH YOU, MARIA. MARIA: DO YOU AGREE THAT THE FIGHT IS NOT OVER YET?>>IT SOUNDS LIKE WHERE THE DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN WITH FROM DAY ONE. SENATOR SCHUMER SAID HE WOULD DO ANYTHING POSSIBLE TO KEEP BRETT KAVANAUGH FROM GOING ON THE COURT.THEY ARE MAKING A BIG MISTAKE. HOLDING THIS INFORMATION, ROLLING IT OUT IN THE MOST UNFAIR WAY TO EVERYBODY INVOLVED AFTER THEY HAVE HAD IT FOR MONTHS. NOT TALKING ABOUT IF WE GET IN CHARGE WE WILL LOOK AT THIS IN SOME OTHER WAY. FRANKLY WHAT THEY’VE MANAGED TO DO IS LEGITIMIZE THE REPUBLICAN BASE IN A WAY THAT USUALLY THE PARTY JUST WON A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, IS NOT ENERGIZED IN THE NEXT ELECTION CYCLE. BUT THE WAY REALLY CONTINUED TO DO IS THIS UNFAIR, REALLY TOTALLY UNREALISTIC BEHAVIOR OF GUILTY ON UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT. WHAT WE CAN DO TO STOP POLITICAL OPPONENTS FROM BEING ABLE TO DO WHAT VOTERS PUT THEM IN PLACE TODAY.I JUST DON’T THINK IT WORKS. IT DOESN’T WORK FOR THEM. FRANKLY, I THINK THE MORE THEY TALK ABOUT THE KINDS OF THINGS THAT THE CONGRESSMAN APPARENTLY HAS SAID, THEY CANNOT STOP THEM AND THEY OBVIOUSLY, THINK THIS IS A POLITICAL TACTIC THAT WORKS FOR THEM. I DON’T THINK IT WORKS AT ALL. MARIA: WHAT DO THE MIDTERMS LOOK LIKE AT THIS POINT FROM YOUR STANDPOINT? HAVE THINGS CHANGED, GIVEN THE LEVEL OF HATE AND HACK ON THE LEFT?>>THINGS HAVE CHANGED, WE WILL SEE IN FOUR WEEKS AND A COUPLE OF DAYS HOW MUCH THEY HAVE CHANGED. IT IS CLEAR THAT THINGS HAVE CHANGED AGAIN, CONSERVATIVE VOTERS, REPUBLICAN VOTERS, CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVES ARE ENERGIZED LIKE THEY WERE NOT BEFORE. IF WE’VE LEARNED ANYTHING FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP, IT IS HOW SHORT THE NEWS CYCLE IS AND WE WILL SEE WHETHER THIS IS SUSTAINED OR NOT. I BELIEVE IT WILL BE. I THINK THE TACTICS USED BY DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE, THE OBVIOUS PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS, SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THAT COMMITTEE AND THE SENATE WERE PURSUING, JUST LOOK LIKE THE POLITICS DOESN’T EVER END, IT’S GOTTEN OUT OF CONTROL AND NOW THEY WANT TO CARRY IT INTO DEARLY GOVERNING. I THINK IT IS NOT GOING TO WORK, JUDGE KAVANAUGH IS PROBABLY THE MOST INVESTIGATED, VETTED PERSON MAY BE IN HISTORY OF CONFIRMATION PIT SEVEN CONFIRMATIONS. NOTHING THAT, AND BY THE WAY, EVERY ONE OF THOSE QUESTIONS, EVERY ONE OF THOSE SEVEN BACKGROUND CHECKS, QUESTIONS ABOUT DRINKING OR HAVE THEY EVER HEARD ANY THING THAT THEY SHOULD FOLLOW UP ON. ONE REASON ACTUAL BACKGROUND CHECKS THEMSELVES NEED TO REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL IS, YOU NEVER WANT PEOPLE TO BE HESITANT TO SAY, I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS TRUE OR NOT BUT I HEARD THIS.THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED WITH JUDGE KAVANAUGH SEVEN TIMES. NO ONE HAS EVER HEARD ANYTHING. MARIA: MEANWHILE, WHERE DOES A CYNICAL NOW IN TERMS OF LACK OF CIVILITY AND THESE ATTACKS? SUSAN COLLINS HAS BEEN FLOODED WITH HATE TWEETS. I WILL READ YOU ONE OF THEM. I HOPE SOMEONE KILLS YOU. I WILL NOT MOURN YOUR DEATH. ANOTHER ONE SAYS. I CANNOT EVEN READ THE REST, IT IS ACTUALLY DISGUSTING! HERE’S CHUCK GRASSLEY THAT JOINED ME LAST WEEK WITH MORNINGS WITH MARIE ON FOX BUSINESS TO TALK ABOUT WHAT HAS TAKEN PLACE HERE. LISTEN.>>I ALSO THINK THAT THAT RESISTANCE THAT HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE SINCE NOVEMBER 2016, IS HEADQUARTERED ON CAPITOL HILL WHEN YOU HAVE CONGRESSWOMEN SAY THAT YOU GET IN THE FACE OF ANYBODY THAT IS IN THE CABINET. WE HAVE SENATORS SAY, GET IN THE FACE. WE OUGHT TO BE SETTING AN EXAMPLE OF CIVILITY AS LEADERS IN PUBLIC SERVICE, THAT THE RESISTANCE IS VERY MUCH, THE MODUS OPERANDI. MARIA: DOES LOOK LIKE GETTING THINGS DONE EXECUTING AN AGENDA WHEN YOU HAVE THIS DIVISION AND HATE?>>WE BACK TO GOTTEN A LOT DONE THIS CONGRESS. MARIA: YES, YOU HAVE!>>THE BILLS AT THE RIGHT TIME, THE FAA EXTENSION, THE OPIOID BILL, INCREASE IN HEALTHCARE FUNDING. WE ARE GETTING A LOT DONE BUT NO ONE IS ABLE TO SEE THAT BECAUSE OF SO MUCH NOISE AND SO MUCH COVERAGE OF THAT NOISE. CLEARLY, I CHAIRED THE INAUGURATION. I WAS THERE AND IN CHARGE OF THAT DAY. I SAID, WHAT WE ARE REALLY GOOD AT THE COUNTRY WHERE WE SET A STANDARD FOR EVERYONE ELSE IS THE TRANSFER OF POWER. BUT THIS IS AN ELECTION WITH THE SIDE THAT LOST, HAS NOT BEEN WILLING TO ACCEPT THE TRANSFER OF POWER. TO BE THE RELIABLE QUESTIONER OF WHAT IS GOING ON, BUT NOT TO CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE THERE. YOU KNOW, JUST TRYING TO GET UNDER SECRETARIES OF THIS AND THAT OF THE OTHER CONFIRMED FOR THE SENATE HAS BEEN ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE AND THE SUPREME COURT JUST SHOWS HOW FAR THINK THE OTHER SIDE IS PREPARED TO TAKE THIS. MARIA: AND BY THE WAY, IT SEEMS LIKE THE KAVANAUGH FIGHT HAS BROUGHT THE NEVER TRUMPERS — EVEN THOSE THAT DID NOT ACCEPT THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC INSIDE GOT TOGETHER WITH HIM AND TO MAKE SURE THAT KAVANAUGH WAS CONFIRMED. IT SEEMS LIKE IT HAS IMPROVED RELATIONS. IS THAT A FAIR STATEMENT?>>I THINK WE SEE WITH THE PRESIDENT GETS DONE AS OPPOSED TO MAYBE, THE WAY HE DOES IT, IT IS UNBELIEVABLY STRONG ECONOMY, TRADE BILLS SEEM TO BE COMING TOGETHER. THE ABILITY TO PUT PEOPLE ON THE COURT THAT WILL LOOK AT THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAW AND SEE WHAT IT SAYS. I THINK THERE IS A SENSE AMONG REPUBLICANS THAT THIS FIGHT IS BETTER THAN YOUR PERSONAL FEELINGS ABOUT ANYBODY IN IT. MARIA: SURE.>>I THINK THERE HAS BEEN A CONSOLIDATION AND THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF, I THINK IS BEGIN TO APPRECIATE WAYS HE IS NOT BEFORE HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THAT YOU SUPPORT THE PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT YOU AND WORK WITH THEM

The spotlight is on the growing diversity in the Democratic Party


WE MET WELCOME BACK. WITH THE START OF THE NEW CONGRESS, THE SPOTLIGHT IS ON THE GROWING DIVERSITY IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE LACK OF DIVERSITY IN THE GOP. TAKE A LOOK AT THIS. IN THE NEW CONGRESS 38% OF DEMOCRATS COMPARED TO JUST 8% OF REPUBLICANS. WHILE 37% OF DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS AND MINORITIES, 90% OF HOUSE REPUBLICANS ARE WHITE MEN. 90%. DOES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAVE A DIVERSITY PROBLEM? TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION WE TURN TO A WHITE MAN. [LAUGHTER] I DON’T WANT TO GO ON ABOUT, I’M NOT SORT OF ARGUING FOR THE SAKE OF IT BUT I DO THINK THERE COMES A POINT WHEN IT JUST MATTERS AND NOT BECAUSE OF ANYTHING OTHER THAN IT’S BETTER TO HAVE MORE PEOPLE AROUND THE TABLE TO REPRESENT THE PEOPLE YOU’RE TRYING TO DO POLICY FOR.>>I THINK IT’S A HUGE PROBLEM FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. IF YOU COMPARE 1989 AND 2019, THE DEMOCRATS WENT FROM ECKSTEIN WOMEN TO 80 WOMEN, IT’S WHY THE WORK THAT MY BRILLIANT COLLEAGUE IS DOING TO RECRUIT, I WOULD COMMEND AN OP-ED SHE WROTE TO REACHING OUT TO THE YOUNGER WOMEN THAT HAVE BEEN ELECTED, SHE WAS THE YOUNGEST WOMAN EVER ELECTED AND NOW HAS SURRENDERED THAT TITLE. IT’S A GREAT OP-ED. I’M ACTUALLY EXCITED BY THE AMOUNT OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN THIS CONGRESS. I WENT TO BEING THE SECOND YOUNGEST AND I DON’T THINK I’M IN THE TOP TEN. I THINK THAT THE BODY OF PEOPLE WHO CAN WORK TOGETHER FOR THEM TO ADVANCE HIS AGENDA, WITHOUT LOOKING ABSURDLY POLITICALLY CORRECT.>>GO BACK AND LOOK AT THE 2016 PRIMARY. FOR REPUBLICANS YOU HAD BEN CARSON, TEDDY CRUZ, MARCO RUBIO, BOBBY JINDAL, CARLY PURINA, THEY NEVER GOT ANY ATTENTION. WHAT WAS THE DEMOCRAT PRIMARY FIELD. BERNIE SANDERS AND HILLARY CLINTON? THEY CAN’T REMEMBER WHO ELSE RAN ON THE DEMOCRAT TICKET BUT IT WASN’T DIVERSE. DIVERSITY IS ONLY PAID ATTENTION TO OR WOMEN IN CONGRESS, ALSO KELLYANNE CONWAY DIDN’T GET ANY ATTENTION WHEN SHE WAS THE FIRST FEMALE CAMPAIGN MANAGER TO WIN.>>OBVIOUSLY I’M EXCITED ABOUT DIVERSITY. I WILL FAVOR BUT HE WHO LOOKS LIKE ME DOESN’T REPRESENT MY INTEREST, BUT THERE NEEDS TO

Liberal students want Georgia professor fired for criticizing illegal immigration


WINS HE WILL GIVE HIM A CREEPY PORN PARDON.>>Tucker: A HISTORY PROFESSOR AT GEORGETTE COLLEGE OUTSIDE OF ATLANTA. THE KIND OF IMMIGRANT WE WOULD WANT IN THIS COUNTRY. IS HE HE IS HE EE IS HE EDUCATED AND KNOWS THE ENGLISH WELL AND CARES A LOT ABOUT WHAT’S BEST FOR THE UNITED STATES, HIS NEW COUNTRY. PROFESSOR ZHU IS ALSO A CRITIC OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. FOR THAT HE HAS BEEN ATTACKED. IT’S A THOUGHT CRIME. SOME ARE CALLING FOR HIM TO BE FIRED. ONE LAWMAKER IN GEORGIA EVEN VOICED PLANS TO WRITE TO HIS COLLEGE TO VOICE QUOTE CONCERNS ORWELLIAN TERM. PRESIDENT ZHU SAYS HE WON’T BACK DOWN AND HE JOINS US TONIGHT. PROFESSOR, THANKS VERY MUCH FOR COMING ON.>>THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. FIRST OF ALL I’M ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR WITH JOB SECURITY. MY INSTITUTION HAS AN ACADEMIC FREEDOM POLICY. I TEACH STUDENTS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LEGAL AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. SO LUMPING LEGAL AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION TOGETHER IS NOT ONLY WRONG IT’S DEEPLY OFFENSIVE. IT’S LIKE LUMPING PHARMACISTS AND DRUG DEALERS TOGETHER AND CALLING AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT A QUOTE UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT IS LIKE CALLING A DRUG DEALER, QUOTE AN UNLICENSED PHARMACIST OR A STUDENT WHO INTENTIONALLY CHEATED ON A TEST A, QUOTE: ANSWER KEY BORROWER.>>Tucker: IF I HAD A PROFESSOR LIKE YOU IN COLLEGE, I PROBABLY WOULD HAVE LEARNED SOMETHING AND ENJOYED IT. WHAT DO YOUR KIDS SAY? WHAT DO YOU’RE STUDENTS SAY WHEN YOU PEEL OFF A LINE LIKE THAT.>>MOST OF MY STUDENTS ARE AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. I RESPECT EVERYONE’S VIEWPOINTS. I TELL STUDENTS YOU DON’T HAVE TO BELIEVE ME. IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A CONVINCING ARGUMENT, PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE.>>Tucker: DO YOU PROVIDE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP YOUR POSITIONS ON IMMIGRATION?>>ABSOLUTELY. THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS STUDIES, HARVARD PROFESSOR GEORGE HAS CONDUCTED THE MOST IN-DEPTH STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ON NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY AND HOW THAT DIRECTLY LOWERS THE INCOMES OF HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES, THOSE R. WITH LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA IN THE UNITED STATES.>>Tucker: YEAH. SO, FOR THE SAYING WHAT YOU JUST SAID, BACKING UP AN OPINION WITH EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE BY HARVARD RESEARCHER, SOME ARE SAYING THAT YOU SHOULD BE FIRED FROM YOUR JOB. WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?>>WELL, FIRST OF ALL, I HAVE JOB SECURITY. I’M AN ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR. MY INSTITUTION HAS AN ACADEMIC FREEDOM POLICY. MY PERSPECTIVE IS EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO THEIR OPINIONS. I DON’T KNOW THIS LAWMAKER. SHE DOESN’T REPRESENT ME. I HAVE NEVER MET HER. SHE CAN SAY WHATEVER SHE WANTS. SO SHE CAN CONTACT MY INSTITUTION, APPARENTLY SHE HAS SOME PRO-ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION FOLLOWERS. I HAVE GOTTEN LOTS AND LOTS OF MESSAGES. MOST OF THEM ARE OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORTIVE. I HAVE A FEW THAT DISAGREE WITH MY VIEWS, BUT I RESPECT EVERYONE’S OPINION. EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.>>Tucker: FIRST OF ALL, I JUST WANT TO SAY, AGAIN, I’M SO GLAD THAT YOU MOVED TO THIS COUNTRY. I ADMIRE YOUR BRAVERY. I CAN’T BELIEVE THERE IS SOMEONE LIKE YOU STILL TEACHING IN AN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY. WHAT DO YOUR COLLEAGUES THINK OF YOU?>>WELL, I THINK MOST OF MY COLLEAGUES KNOW MY ANTI-ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION ACTIVISM AND THEY UNDERSTAND MY PERSPECTIVE AS A LEGAL IMMIGRANT AND I FEEL LIKE MY COLLEAGUES RESPECT MY VIEWS AND I RESPECT THEIR VIEW.>>Tucker: DO YOU REALLY THINK THEY RESPECT YOUR VIEW? I HOPE YOU ARE RIGHT. SO, WHEN YOU MOVED TO THIS COUNTRY AND THEY TOLD YOU WE HAD FREE SPEECH HERE YOU TOOK THAT VERY SERIOUSLY. I CAN TELL.>>WELL, HERE’S WHAT I WILL SAY. I ALWAYS VOTE IN EVERY SINGLE ELECTION. I’M THE PROUD GEORGIA REPUBLICAN. I VOTE IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY. AND I’M GOING TO WORK AS HARD AS CAN I TO HELP MY FRIEND CONGRESSWOMAN KAREN HANDEL GET REELECTED IN 2020 IN THE GEORGIA’S SIXTH DISTRICT.>>Tucker: DO YOU THINK YOUR COLLEAGUES ARE OKAY WITH THAT, TOO?>>WELL, IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT THEIR OPINIONS ARE. I RESPECT THEIR VIEWS. SOME OF THEM LIVE IN MY DISTRICT. SOME OF THEM DON’T. I ASSUME MORE OF THEM ARE LIBERAL. SOME MIGHT BE MODERATE. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I RESPECT THEIR VIEWS AND THEY UNDERSTAND WHERE I’M COMING FROM. AND I THINK THEY RESPECT MY VIEWS.>>Tucker: DO YOU THINK THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS MORE IMMIGRANTS LIKE YOU?>>WELL, I DON’T KNOW BUT I WILL TELL YOU THIS: IN OTHER COUNTRIES LIKE CANADA THEY HAVE A MERIT BASED POINT SYSTEM WHERE THEY GIVE PRIORITY TO WELL-EDUCATED LEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO HAVE COLLEGE DEGREES WHO CAN SPEECH ENGLISH AND WHO HAVE JOB SKILLS THAT ARE NEED. NO COUNTRY ON EARTH HAS 12 MILLION ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND GIVE BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP TO THE CHILDREN OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.>>Tucker: I’M FOR ANY PROGRAM THAT ADMITS MORE PEOPLE LIKE YOU INTO THIS COUNTRY. BUT, WOULDN’T YOU THINK THAT DEMOCRATS WOULD BE HAPPY TO HAVE YOU? I MEAN IF THEY’RE PRO-IMMIGRANT, I IMAGINE YOU MUST BE GETTING CALLS FROM DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKERS JUST THANKING YOU FOR EXPRESSING YOUR OPINION. HAVE YOU?>>WELL, I’M A REPUBLICAN. BUT I RESPECT A LOT OF DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKERS. SO, I THINK THAT FOR ONE THING IS UNITED STATES HAS 12 MILLION ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. NO OTHER COUNTRY ON EARTH HAS 12 MILLION ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND GIVES BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP TO THE CHILDREN OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. IF YOU LOOK AT CANADA AND AUSTRALIA, THEY HAVE A MERIT-BASED IMMIGRATION SYSTEM THAT GIVES PRIORITY TO THOSE WITH COLLEGE DEGREES, ENGLISH-SPEAKING SKILLS AND JOB SKILLS THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THEIR ECONOMY. SO THEY HAVE VERY FEW ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.>>Tucker: OF COURSE. IF YOU CARED ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY, I WOULD HAVE A SYSTEM LIKE THAT. IT WOULDN’T EVEN BE A QUESTION.

The extreme left’s takeover of the Democratic party


>>OKAY, SO LAST WEEK I SAW TWO PEOPLE REALLY CAPTURE WHAT SEEMS TO BE GOING ON IN TODAY’S DEMOCRATIC PARTY, TAKE A LOOK.>>STOP BEING MODERATE, TAKE A POSITION, ALL RIGHT, THERE’S NO MIDDLE GROUND ANYMORE.>>WHEN IT COME TO 2020 DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION, CENTRIST NOT APPLY.>>DEMOCRATS ARE GOING MORE AND MORE LEFT, THIS REMINDED ME OF SOMETHING, MY CHILDHOOD IN 1980’s BRITAIN THE LABOUR PARTY EQUIVALENT TO DEMOCRATS CAPTURED BY LEFT WING, IT BECAME KNOWN AS THE LOONIE LEFT, THEY BECOME SO NOTORIOUS IN THE UK THAT EVEN 60 MINUTES HERE IN AMERICA REPORTED ON IT.>>THE NAME OF THE STORY IS THE LOONIE LEFT, A GROUP-HOLDING POWER IN BRITAIN’S INNER CENTER WHICH POLICIES ARE TO DESTABILIZE PARTY AND THE NATION.>>LOONIE-LEFT POLITICS, MASSIVE TAX INCREASES AND LUXURY GOODS TAX, NATIONALIZATION OF ENERGY COMPANIES AN OTHER UTILITIES LABELING LOCAL AREAS, NUCLEAR-FREE ZONES, DISCOURAGING SCHOOLS FROM USING PICTURES OF TEDDY BEARS BECAUSE THEY ARE EUROPEAN AND THEREFORE UNFAIR TO THE CHILDREN OF IMMIGRANTS. WE THOUGHT WE DEFEATED THE LOONIE LEFT WITH MARGARET THATCHER, NO, THEY ARE BACK WITH JEREMY CORBYN. JUST LISTEN TO THE POLICIES THAT DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN COMING OUT WITH. 70% INCOME TAX, 90% INCOME TAX, WEALTH TAX, GUN BAN, ABOLISH ICE, ABOLISH PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE, ABOLISH THE COAL INDUSTRY, ABOLISH THE OIL INDUSTRY, ABOLISH THE GAS INDUSTRY, ABOLISH THE FRACKING INDUSTRY, ABORTION ON DEMAND, BAN HE OR SHE, BLOCK CHARTER SCHOOLS, OPEN BORDERS, CUT THE U.S. MILITARY IN HALF, ABOLISH AIR TRAVEL, ABOLISH SPACE EXPLORATION, THESE ARE NOT MADE UP, THIS IS NOT A JOKE, THESE ARE DIRECT PROMISES FOR THE CONSEQUENCE OF OTHER PROMISES, IT’S NOT EVEN A FULL LIST, MY GOD, WE DID A QUICK CALCULATION OF THE NUMBER OF JOBS THESE LOONIE-LEFT POLITICS WILL DESTROY, GET READY, OVER 3 MILLION, THEY SAY GREEN NEW DEALS WILL INCLUDE GOVERNMENT-GUARANTEED JOB FOR EVERY AMERICAN, IT’S GOING TO HAVE TO CONSIDERING THE NUMBER PRIVATE-SECTOR JOBS IT’S GUARANTIED TO DESTROY. NO WONDER PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFUL, HOWARD SCHULTZ, A LIFE-LONG DEMOCRAT SAYS HE HAS TO BE INDEPENDENT BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATS ARE SO EXTREME, BUT THERE IS ONE PERSON WHO HAS GOT TO BE HAPPY ABOUT THE LOONIE-LEFT TAKEOVER OF THE DEMOCRATS AND THAT IS PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP. HENRY, WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF IT?>>I THINK YOU’RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. REMINDS ME IN 1983 ELECTION WHEN THE LOONIE-LEFT TOOK OVER LABOUR. YOU HAD MARGARET THATCHER, MASSIVE MAJORITY WITH MINORITY OF THE VOTE AND DONALD TRUMP WILL BE ROOTING FOR THIS LOONIE-LEFT TAKEOVER OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND EGG IT OUT OVER THE NEXT YEAR. AMERICANS WANT LIKE WE HAVE BEEN TALKING COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS THAT KEEP GETTING PROMISED, THAT’S WHAT BUSH SAID HE WAS GOING TO DO AND DIDN’T DELIVER, THAT’S WHAT OBAMA SAID HE WAS GOING TO DO AND DIDN’T DELIVER, TRUMP IS GOING TO WIN LANDSLIDE.>>I AGREE WITH THAT. MORE LEFT AND LEFT ALL THE WAY TO PRIMARY OR BIDEN, LOOK, THIS IS RIDICULOUS, LET’S GET BACK TO THE CENTER WHERE THE VOTES ARE?>>SURE THEY WILL, THEY DID IT DURING MIDTERM. A LOT OF PEOPLE TALKED ABOUT THE LEFT, THE LEFT, OVERNIGHT PROGRESSIVES DURING THE PRIMARY AND YOU NOTICED WHEN GENERAL ELECTION HAPPENED A LOT MOVED BACK TO THE CENTER, LIKE IT OR NOT MOST AMERICANS ARE IN THE CENTER, FOR PEOPLE TO SAY I SAW MICHAEL MOORE THE OTHER DAY, THERE IS NO CENTER. LAST A LIE, MOST PEOPLE AGREE WITH ONE OR THE OTHER AND THAT’S WHY I’M INDEPENDENT AND NOT PART OF THE LOONIE LEFT BECAUSE –>>YES.>>NOT PART TO HAVE LOONIE LEFT. [LAUGHTER]>>NEVER AGAIN. I WOULD NEVER BE ELECTED OFFICIAL. [LAUGHTER]>>BUT ARE IN THE CENTER. I HAVE CONSERVATIVE VIEWS AND I HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS AND TO KEEP DOING DIVIDE IS ALL ABOUT EMOTION AND WON’T WORK DURING GENERAL ELECTION, SOMEBODY LIKE JOE BIDEN OR HOWARD SCHULTZ WHO APPARENTLY EVERYONE IS AFRAID OF –>>WE WILL GET, SAVE IT FOR LATER. [LAUGHTER]>>EXCITED.>>YOU WILL.>>HE CAME AS PRETTY PRAGMATIC, PROBLEM-SOLVING, I THINK THE IDEOLOGICAL APPROACH THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS SEEM TO BE TAKING, REAL RISK FOR THEM.>>IT’S A RISK IN GENERAL ELECTION BUT I THINK IT’S WHERE THE ENERGY IS AND THEIR PRIMARY, CLEARLY.>>I’M AN AN AMATEUR POLITICAL SCIENTISTS, THIS IS NOT A LIBERAL PRESIDENCY, THIS IS QUITE FAMOUSLY A MODERATE PRESIDENCY, A MODERATE PRESIDENT, MODERATE VICE PRESIDENT AND, OF COURSE, YOU HAVE GEORGE W. BUSH, EVEN WITH BARACK OBAMA THERE WERE SOME THINGS THAT WERE LIBERAL AND AND THEN LOOK THROUGHOUT POLITICAL HISTORY IT WILL SWING BACK AND FORTH. WE KNOW THE MOOD OF THE COUNTRY WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY IS VERY LEFT. WILL THE MOOD OF THE GENERAL ELECTORATE ME OF THAT SAME PENDULUM? .>>ONE OF THE THINGS WITH THE BACKGROUND OF ALL OF THIS IN THE LAST MONTH OR SO ALEXANDRIA CORTEZ I THINK WE ARE SUPPOSED TO CALL HER AOC. [LAUGHTER] ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THEY SAY THAT IT IS CALLED THE WINDOW THAT I DON’T KNOW EXACTLY WHERE IT COMES FROM BUT WITH THE POSSIBILITY AND WHAT IS ON THE AGENDA SHE SINGLE-HANDEDLY IS MOVING THEM. THEY WERE THOUGHT TO BE CRAZY AND IS NOW IN MAINSTREAM. AND WITH 90 PERCENT. AND TUESDAY TO GO TO THE PRIVATE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY BUT IS THIS MOVING TOO QUICKLY? .>>I DO KNOW WHERE THAT WINDOW COMES FROM WHAT THAT THINK TANK IN MICHIGAN OF JOE OVERTON. [LAUGHTER] .>>IF THERE IS A SILENT MAJORITY IT ISN’T A MAJORITY

Portland, Maine overrun with African migrants


>>Laura: LAST NIGHT, WE WERE THE ONLY ONE TO BRING YOU THE STORY OF HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF CONGOLESE IMMIGRANTS BEING DROPPED OFF IN SAN ANTONIO AFTER CROSSING THE BORDER. FOR MANY OF THEM, THAT’S NOT THE FINAL STOP. DR. COLLEEN BRIDGER REVEALED THIS TO A LOCAL CBS STATION. “THE PLAN WAS 350 OF THEM WOULD TRAVEL FROM SAN ANTONIO TO PORTLAND MAINE. WHEN WE REACHED OUT TO PORTLAND, MAINE, THEY SAID DON’T SEND US ANYMORE. WE’RE ALREADY STRETCHED WAY BEYOND OUR CAPACITY.” WHY WOULD PORTLAND BE BEYOND THEIR CAPACITY? I WANT TO GO BACK TO JANUARY OF THIS YEAR WHEN JANET MILLS GAVE HER INAUGURAL ADDRESS.>>WE WELCOME THE VOICES OF NEWCOMERS TO THE PUBLIC CONVERSATION, THE YOUNG, THE IMMIGRANTS, PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT CULTURES, ALL ARE IMPORTANT MEMBERS OF THE MAINE FAMILY. FROM NOW ON, YES, A SIGN WILL GREET ALL OF THOSE ARRIVING IN OUR STATE AND IT WILL SAY SIMPLY WELCOME HOME.>>Laura: ISN’T THAT NICE? IN PORTLAND ALONE, ASYLUM SEEKERS THAT ARE PRIMARILY FROM AFRICAN COUNTRIES MAKE UP 90% OF THE PEOPLE LIVING IN A CITY RUN FAMILY AND OVERFLOW SHELTERS. BACK TO TODAY. WHEN THE SAN ANTONIO MANAGER’S REQUEST TO PORTLAND WAS TURNED DOWN, THE RESPONSE WAS JARRING. WE’RE WORKING WITH THEM TO IDENTIFY OTHER CITIES THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES WHERE THEY CAN GO AND BEGIN THEIR ASYLUM-SEEKING PROCESS. WHERE ARE THESE MIGRANTS GOING TO BE DROPPED NEXT? THAT’S ANYONE’S GUEST. THE FACT THAT TWO CITIES IN TWO STATES, THOUSANDS OF MILES APART ARE BOTH AT CAPACITY? SHOULD BE ALARMING FOR ALL AMERICANS. WE REACHED OUT TO OFFICIALS IN PORTLAND, MAINE AND RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING RESPONSE FROM A CITY COUNSELOR. PORTLAND IS PROUD TO BE A WELCOMING CITY AND THOSE SEEKING TO BECOME AN AMERICAN. NO CITY OF 67,000 PEOPLE CAN POSSIBLY MANAGE TO ENTIRE NATION’S IMMIGRANT SITUATION ON ITS OWN. WOW! WE’RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO

Democrats openly embracing gun confiscation


ON THE LINE. THAT IS THE ANGLE. JOINING ME TO DEBATE THIS IS CONSERVATIVE AUTHOR AND FILMMAKER AND ETHAN BIERMAN, HOST OF LEFTIST NEWS. IT DOES SAY SEEM LIKE EVERY WEE LIBERALS PROVE A DIFFERENT STEREOTYPE CORRECT. WE JUST LAID OUT A IF YOU HAVE THEM IN THE ANGLE, BUT WE COULD DO AN ENTIRE HOUR ON THIS. ON. ON THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE OF GUNS , YOUR THOUGHTS.>>WELL, I THINK THAT THIS VINDICATES KIND OF WHAT THE NRA HAS BEEN WARNING FROM THE OUTSET . AT FIRST, FOR MANY YEARS I THOUGHT THE NRA WAS KIND OF USING THE SLIPPERY SLOPE ARGUMENT THAT WAS THAT ESSENTIALLY THAT ONCE YOU START OUT LYING ONE TYPE OF WEAPON, YOU WILL THEN SLOWLY PROCEED TO OUTLINE THE NEXT TYPE AND THEN IT BECOMES KIND OF A COMPREHENSIVE CONFISCATION. WHAT’S INTERESTING IS THIS ISN’ EVEN A SLIPPERY SLOPE, IT NOW APPEARS LIKE THERE’S A WHOLE GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT FROM THE OUTSET WANT A COMPREHENSIVE BAN AND THESE MASS SHOOTINGS ARE MAKING THEM COME OUT OF THE CLASSIC AND BE MORE AND MORE FRANK AND CANDID ABOUT WHAT THEIR REAL AGENDA IS. IT NEVER WAS A KIND OF TARGETED OR NARROWLY TARO TAILORED WHILE IT IS ULTIMATELY AN ALL-OUT ASSAULT ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT. LET’S REMEMBER THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NO LESS IMPORTANT THAN THE FIRST AMENDMENT OR THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, SO WE SHOULD JEALOUSLY GUARD AGAINST THESE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BEING STRIPPED AWAY BASED UPON SOME SORT OF PRETEXT. IF YOU’RE GOING TO ABUSE YOUR RIGHTS, THE SOLUTION IS NOT TO TAKE AWAY MY RIGHTS.>>AND WANT TO GET YOU IN ON THIS BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY IT’S A HOT TOPIC. WE HAVE THESE HORRIFIC SHOOTING AND PEOPLE WANT TO END THEIR SHOOTINGS. THEY WANT TO PROTECT INNOCENT LIFE WHICH IS AN INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT GOAL FOR ALL AMERICANS . ON THIS ISSUE OF THE 94 BAND WHICH THAT IS CITED OFTEN TIMES BY DEMOCRATS. I JUST LAID OUT IN THE ANGLE HO THE UNIVERSITY STUDY THAT WAS DONE TO REPORT TO THE DOJ COULDN’T SAY THAT IT REALLY RESULTED IN FEWER GUN DEATHS, THAT WE HAVE PEOPLE ON TELEVISION, ON MSNBC, JOYCE VANCE SAID THIS.>>YOU KNOW, WE HAD A BAN ON MILITARY ASSAULT STYLE WEAPONS IN THIS COUNTRY IN THE ’90s AND IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. WHEN THAT MAN STOPPED BEING IN EXISTENCE WITH THE PRESSURE OF THE NRA AND OTHER GUN SUPPORTER THAT FLOODED THE GUNS BACK INTO THE COUNTRY.>>WE LAID OUT HOW ONLY 7 PERCENT OF GUNS THEY CRIMES ARE COMMITTED BY GUNS BOUGHT FROM A LICENSED DEALER. HAD USED WHERE THOSE WITH A DESIRE FOR GOING BACK TO THE OL ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN?>>CITING THAT UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA STUDY CONFIRMS WHERE THEY ARE INSANE WE NEED T HAVE A BUYBACK PROGRAM IN PLACE BECAUSE THE WEAPONS WERE ALREAD OUT THERE THE LARGE CAPACITY MAGAZINES WERE ALREADY OUT THER BANNING THE SALE DIDN’T STOP IT IT WAS ALREADY IN CIRCULATION. THE GREAT DEMOCRAT EXCUSE ME, REPUBLICAN RONALD REAGAN SAID THESE THINGS, I SUPPORT THIS SPORTING RIFLES, I SUPPORT HOME DEFENSE IS WHAT JOE BIDEN HAS SAID AS WELL I’M WITH RONALD REAGAN, FURTHERMORE, WE BOTH WORKED FOR REAGAN. I MUST HAVE MISSED THIS DID RONALD REAGAN PUSH AN ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN DURING HIS EIGHT YEARS? HE AND I BOTH WORKED IN DOMESTI POLICY AT THE WHITE HOUSE, I DON’T REMEMBER THAT PERSONALLY. BUT MAYBE YOU DO. YOUR MEMBER THAT HAPPENING?>>I CERTAINLY DON’T. I WOULD LIKE HIM TO ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT MORE.>>GO AHEAD. I DON’T WANT THAT TO GO.>>INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH. HE JUST TREATED OUT THE VIDEO OVER RONALD REAGAN SPEAKING INSANE THOSE EXACT WORDS.>>HE SUPPORTED THE BRADY BILL AS WELL AFTER HIS PRESIDENCY. SO HE CLEARLY SUPPORTED REGULATION OF FIREARMS TO RATE VARYING DEGREE. A VARIETY OF REGULATIONS ABSOLUTELY ARE SUPPORTED UNDER OUR FIRST AMENDMENT AND OUR CONSTITUTION. IT IS TIME TO END THE MASS SHOOTINGS. THE KEY THING THAT IS CONSISTEN HERE IN THE UNITED STATES THAT SETS US APART FROM ALL OF THE OTHER DEVELOPED WESTERN NATIONS WHICH HAVE UNTIL HEALTH ISSUES, VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS IT IS HIGH RATE OF FIRE.>>GUNS CAN BE MODIFIED FOR ITS REAGAN SPEECH I THINK I NOW KNO WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT, HE WAS REFERRING TO MACHINE GUNS. AND BETO DOESN’T KNOW HIS LINE FROM HIS ELBOW ON THIS. IT’S A FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPON. THAT IS NOT ALLOWED IN WASHINGTON, D.C. OR ANY PLACE I THE UNITED STATES. THEY HAVE BEEN BANNED FOR 80 YEARS. THIS IS THE THING THAT THE GUN-CONTROL FOLKS DO GREAT I LIKE ETHAN, BUT YOU ARE RIGHT, THE DECISION DID SAY JUST A SCHOOL WE HAD DID SAY IT DOESN’ MEAN THAT THERE CAN BE NO REGULATIONS ON FIREARMS, AND I THINK HE’S RIGHT ABOUT THAT, HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT THAT IN THE DECISION, BUT YOU’RE MAKING IT OUT LIKE HE SAID OH, ANY SEMI AUTOMATIC WEAPON CAN BE BANNED AND REMAIN CONSTITUTIONAL, THAT IS NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE AT ALL. THESE ARE IMPORTANT DETAILS THA I THINK WE HAVE TO BE VERY CLEA ON.>>NUMBER ONE, THERE OBVIOUSLY AS WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT, THERE ARE EXTREME CASES IN WHIC ONE CAN REGULATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT OR EVEN THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. YOU CAN’T SHOUT A FIRE IN A CROWDED THEATER. THERE IS A HEAVY BURDEN OF PROO FOR THOSE WHO WOULD WANT TO INFRINGE THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT. NUMBER TWO, LEAPS EVEN AROUND THE WORLD TODAY CASES WHERE THE CONFISCATION AND EVEN BUYBACK PROGRAMS HUGO CHAVEZ HAD A BUYBACK PROGRAM FOR GUNS IN VENEZUELA. AS SOON AS THEY WERE DEPRIVED O THEIR GUNS HE HAD STATE LICENSE THUGS ON THE STREETS TO BE ABLE TO MOVE INTO YOUR APARTMENT, TAKE YOUR STUFF, WHY? HE HAD DISARMED THE CITIZENS IN PREPARATION FOR THAT. THIRD, YOU FOCUS ON MASS SHOOTINGS, MASS SHOOTINGS ARE A LITTLE BIT OF AN ANOMALY WHEREA THERE ARE EVERY DAY SHOOTINGS OCCURRING IN EVERY MAJOR CITY I THIS COUNTRY. ITS ODD THAT THOSE DON’T LEAD T DEMANDS FOR GUN CONTROL IN FACT THOSE DON’T LEAD TO DEMANDS FOR ANYTHING. IT SEEMS ONLY WHEN THERE IS SUDDENLY PEOPLE GO LET’S CONFISCATE THE GUNS OF EVERYBOD IN AMERICA BECAUSE EVERYBODY WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE POSES A THREAT. KNOW, EVERYONE WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE DOES NOT POSE A THREAT TO THESE GUYS POSE A THREAT LET’S IDENTIFY THE THREATS, FIND OUT HOW WE CAN PREEMPT IT AND DEAL WITH IT IN A TAILORED AND NARROWLY FOCUSED WAY.>>ETHAN, DO YOU THINK THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, HAPPEN THEY REALLY HAVE SHIFTED ON A WHOLE BUNCH OF ISSUES. THERE WASN’T GOING TO BE HEALTHCARE FOR ILLEGALS, NOW IT IS. THEY WEREN’T FOR GOING IN AND TAKING GUNS, BUT NOW THEY PRETT MUCH ARE. AWAY CERTAIN WEAPONS. ON ISSUE OF THE OPEN BORDERS, I SHOULDN’T BE A CRIME, THEY SHOULDN’T BE PENALTIES EXCEPT MAY BE A CIVIL DEAL. SO THEY’VE MOVED ON A LOT OF THESE ISSUES THAT THEY’D WAVED OFF AS STEREOTYPE SPREAD.>>THERE IS SOME TRUTH IN WHAT YOU JUST HAD. THERE IS A REALIZATION THAT WE NEED TO BE STRONGER ON SOME OF THESE ISSUES. THE REALIZATION THAT THESE PEOPLE WHO DON’T HAVE PROPER DOCUMENTATION LIVED AND WORKED AMONGST US, RONALD REAGAN SIGNE A BILL IN 1986 THAT REQUIRED EMERGENCY ROOM TO ACCEPT THEM A WELL. I KEEP GOING BACK TO REAGAN. HE SIGNED THAT LEGISLATION. THE DEMOCRATS TODAY ACTUALLY HAVE THAT UNCOMMON.>>RONALD REAGAN WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE THE CURRENT DEMOCRATI PARTY. HE WOULDN’T RECOGNIZE THE PARTY TODAY. I MEAN I DON’T LIKE TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE WHO AREN’T WITH US